Elon Musk | Bitcoin: What crypto insiders think about Elon Musk’s bitcoin U-turn, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Cyptocurrency enthusiasts got a nasty shock Wednesday when Elon Musk, founder of Tesla Inc. and the second-richest person on the planet, announced on Twitter that his automaker wouldn’t accept payment in Bitcoin any more due to environmental concerns.

After all, this is the same man who just a few months earlier said Tesla bought into Bitcoin, to the tune of $1.5 billion. He tweeted “True” in response to a thread citing research that mining the token might actually spur the uptake of renewable energy, from Ark Investment Management LLC. Bitcoin mining is known to be energy-intensive, with the industry prizing cheap and plentiful power supplies.

Bitcoin slid as much as 15 per cent to nearly $46,000 before recovering. It was down 6.4 per cent at $51,039 as of 2:45 p.m. in Hong Kong.

Here’s what some people in the crypto industry have to say about the development:

New Highs Await?
“This may be the selloff that sets Bitcoin up for new all-time highs,” said David Grider of Fundstrat Global Advisors LLC. “We think the news is overblown and wouldn’t be surprised if Tesla is signaling plans to make crypto ‘greener.’” In a note Wednesday, Grider said Bitcoin has been consolidating for months as its market dominance has waned, but he’s still bullish, with a target of $100,000.

Seeking an Explanation
“The most logical answer is that he’s feeling pressure” from people who think “that one can’t be green and own crypto,” said investor Michael Terpin, calling that position “uninformed.”

“First, there’s virtually no energy expending in SENDING Bitcoin; and the mining of new coins to keep the network secure is still a far lower amount of energy (and 70 per cent of it from renewable sources) than the amount of energy expended to mine the world’s gold or power the global banking systems.”

Watching Other Cryptocurrencies
It wasn’t lost on some pundits that Musk might have his sights set on boosting a rival coin with a greener, perhaps even fluffier, profile. One of the most-liked replies on Twitter to Musk’s original statement was from Billy Markus, the co-creator of Dogecoin — the Shiba Inu-themed cryptocurrency that started as a joke in 2013. That token has become a favorite of Musk’s, and a darling among the retail set of investors and enthusiasts.

“If only there was a merge-mined cryptocurrency that had a much smaller carbon footprint than Bitcoin, and also had a dog on it,” Markus said.

Doesn’t Add Up
“Broadly it’s a bit surprising given Tesla bought Bitcoin for their treasury in January and the argument is the same whether you’re using Bitcoin as a store of value or for transactional purposes,” said Vijay Ayyar, head of Asia-Pacific at Luno Pte., in an email. “So it doesn’t add up. Usually in such cases there are unknown motives at play.”

It Can’t Be
For some, the reaction bordered on disbelief.

“Tell me your account got hacked without telling me your account got hacked,” said Yassine Elmandjra, crypto analyst at Ark, in a reply to Musk’s tweet.

Chance to Buy
“In retrospect, it was a great buying opportunity,” quipped longtime crypto enthusiast and co-founder of Gemini Trust Co. LLC, Cameron Winklevoss, on Twitter.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI tells lenders to re-consider ties with crypto exchanges, traders, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India’s central bank is informally urging lenders to cut ties with cryptocurrency exchanges and traders as the highly speculative market booms, despite a Supreme Court ruling that banks can work with the industry, three sources told Reuters

The guidance comes as India is crafting a law to ban cryptocurrencies and penalize anyone dealing in them, which would be among the most sweeping crackdowns on the new investing fad in the world. But with the COVID-19 crisis engulfing the country, no one is sure when such a bill may be passed, adding to investors’ confusion.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in 2018 had forbidden banks from dealing in all transactions related to bitcoin and other such assets. That diktat was challenged by the crypto exchanges and in March 2020, India’s top court overturned the RBI ban and allowed lenders to extend banking facilities to them.

With investors continuing to rush into the hot new asset class, however, regulators appear to be gearing up for another try.

Thousands of new users are piling into the system every day at a time when the prices of major digital currencies have been on the rise. There are over 10 million crypto investors in India with total holdings of over 100 billion rupees ($1.36 billion), according to industry estimates. No official data is available.

“The regulator has been unofficially asking us that why are we dealing in such business when it is ultra speculative. A lot of money flows overseas via this trade which the RBI is not comfortable with as it may lead to money laundering,” said a senior executive at one of the banks which was contacted.

RBI did not respond to a request for comment.

Private lender ICICI Bank has already asked payment service companies that it works with to stop all crypto-related payment transactions, three sources said, while other lenders are also following suit.

ICICI Bank did not respond to an email seeking comment.

None of the sources wanted to be identified as the discussions with RBI were private and no official order has been issued yet.

“Even though the discussions are informal that is enough. No one wants to go against the regulator,” said another source.

The central bank has often voiced its apprehension about digital currencies. Earlier this year, RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das said that they have “major concerns (around crypto) from the financial stability angle.”.

THE CRYPTO CONUNDRUM
With Indian banks increasingly wary of dealing with them, crypto exchanges are scrambling to find new business partners.

Axis Bank, Citibank, Kotak Mahindra Bank and others are limiting their exposure to the cryptocurrency market, sources said.

“Axis Bank has taken a fairly negative stance against crypto. They are citing internal policy and risk measures and have stopped transactions with crypto exchanges,” said the CEO of a global crypto exchange with presence in India.

IndusInd Bank is also in the process of stopping all crypto-related transasaction, said two sources.

Axis, Kotak and IndusInd did not reply to an email seeking comment while Citibank declined to comment.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

The financial condition of PMC Bank continues to be precarious: RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India said any generalisation for release of funds to meet ‘financial needs’ of scam-hit Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank’s depositors may not be appropriate and sustainable, owing to the bank’s precarious financial position.

The central bank made the aforementioned observation in its affidavit filed in the Delhi High Court in reply to consumer rights activist Bejon Kumar Misra’s petition.

Also read: Distraught depositors want PMC Bank revived soon

Through the petition, Misra is seeking immediate release of emergency funds to meet financial needs arising out of out-break of second wave of Covid-19 and to declare extension of directions issued to PMC Bank under the Banking Regulation Act 1949 as ultra vires.

In its reply, the central bank said there is no merit in the relief sought by the petitioner for immediate release of emergency funds to meet the financial needs arising out of sudden out-break of second wave of Covid-19, as depositors are already allowed to withdraw up to ₹5 lakh on hardship grounds for treatment of terminal illnesses, including treatment of Covid-19.

The RBI further submitted that to make the process of withdrawal on hardship grounds easier and to avoid delays in sending such recommendation to RBI for approval, the authority for approving the payment under hardship grounds has been delegated to the PMC Bank.

“…it is the duty of PMC Bank to pay hardship amount to the eligible depositors as per directions of RBI and subject to availability of liquidity with PMC Bank,” RBI said.

Takeover/ merger

The RBI submitted that the financial condition of PMC Bank continues to be precarious, with its liquidity position not improving enough to allow much room for enhancement of withdrawal limit.

Further, the bank also needs to maintain bare minimum liquidity to run as a going concern and to make itself viable for prospective investors for takeover/ merger etc. Then the reconstruction of the bank will be feasible, which will be in the interest of larger body of depositors, the central bank said.

Due to precarious financial condition of PMC Bank and on account of significant deposit erosion, serious financial irregularities and mismanagement of affairs of the bank and to protect the interest of the depositors in general and in public interest, RBI had placed PMC Bank under directions vide directive dated September 23, 2019, the affidavit said.

Withdrawal limit

The directions are presently valid up to June 30. The withdrawal limit per depositor is capped at ₹1 lakh.

“It is submitted that all efforts are underway to expedite consultations with the prospective investors who have submitted their final offer, in order to arrive at best possible resolution in the interest of all depositors and other stakeholders of the bank,” the central bank said.

The Centrum Group-BharatPe combine is believed to be the font-runner to takeover PMC Bank.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indians prefer digital swipe, but keep cash handy amid Covid, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Digital modes of payment have soared manifold since the demonetisation in late 2016, but cash too has kept pace, more so during the Covid pandemic.

Digital transactions have grown at a CAGR of 66.4% to 40.1 billion transactions in FY20 from 3.1 billion transactions in FY15, as per the Reserve Bank of India data. The average daily digital transactions in India in January 2021 were at 142.6 million, up from 8.6 million in 2015.

Interestingly, the currency in circulation is also at its highest in a decade, as people prefer cash storage in anticipation of medical emergencies amid restrictions in movements.

Cash conundrum

From 12% of the GDP in FY16, currency usage slumped to 8% in FY17 following demonetisation and has been gradually rising since.

Currency in circulation rose 17% ( year-on-year) to Rs 28.6 lakh crore by end-March 2021, compared with 14% at the end of the previous fiscal year, the latest Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data showed. Cash in the system further increased to Rs 29.4 lakh crore as of May 7.

Withdrawal of benefit payouts and subsidies from Jan Dhan accounts, better agriculture output and farm-gate receipts are among the various factors attributed for the cash shortage.

Digital transactions

Digital transactions have grown at a CAGR of 66.4% to 40.1 billion transactions in FY20 from 3.1 billion transactions in FY15, as per central bank data. The average daily digital transactions in India in January 2021 were at 142.6 million, up from 8.6 million in 2015.

The growth of digital payments slowed in April 2021 over March, remained higher than in February, according to a report.

The Unified Payments Interface (UPI) transactions dropped from the Rs 5­ lakh crore peak in March to Rs 4.93 lakh crore via 264 crore transactions.

The Immediate Payment Service (IMPS) saw 32.29 crore transactions worth Rs 2.99­lakh crore in April as against 36.31 crore transactions of Rs 3.27 lakh crore in March.

Bharat Bill pay platform processed 3.51 crore transactions worth ₹Rs 5,201.92 crore in April as against 3.52 crore payments amounting to Rs 5,195.76 crore in March.

As the movement of people and goods slowed, the FASTags, AePS transactions through the NETC saw a sharp decline in April at 16.43 crore transactions worth Rs 2,776.9 crore. It was 19.32 crore transactions worth Rs 3,086.32 crore in March.

The Aadhaar enabled Payment System saw 7.42 crore transactions valued at Rs 22,139.05 crore in April as against 7.78 crore payments worth Rs 22,697.82 crore in March.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Friction over newer compliances rising between auditors, regulators, firms, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


After banks and auditors opposed the introduction of joint audit norms, it’s the turn of the Securities and Exchange Board of India‘s recent rules on due diligence by alternative investment funds that are causing consternation.

The market regulator’s recent rules require alternative investment funds to conduct in-depth due diligence of their portfolio companies. According to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2021, which came into effect on May 5, the regulator has mandated that fund managers conduct this due diligence to make sure their house is in order.

The regulations mainly impact the private equity and venture capital funds that are registered under the Alternative Investment Funds Categories 1 & 2 and hedge funds registered under the AIF Category 3 in India.

The fund managers and trustees will have to ensure that detailed policies and procedures are in place for investments and that provisions over confidentiality, conflict of interest, Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and addressing investor complaints are complied with.

The PPM (private placement memorandum) will be required to check on the detailed policy and procedures as well as the compliance with the code of conduct prescribed under the newly added fourth schedule. The format for reporting requirements to Sebi and trustees could also undergo a change. The new regulations would likely require funds to share the report or the procedures with the auditors.

The due diligence will have to be undertaken at the fund level as well as the investment level.

Fund managers will also have to realign investments to comply with the new regulations, as Sebi has put a threshold on the money a fund can invest in a company or another investment vehicle.

The RBI regulations

On April 27, the RBI released new guidelines for statutory auditors of financial entities to enhance the independence of auditors and tackle concentration issues. The guidelines require mandatory rotation of auditors after three years with a six-year cooling-off period, and appointment of joint auditors in entities having asset size of Rs 15,000 crore and above.

The regulations ran into opposition from bankers and auditors who wanted it to be deferred citing less time to appoint auditors and crunch. The new guidelines have come in at the end of April. We have to evaluate how we can sort of look at appointing new auditors so quickly.

Because the RBI guidelines say that existing auditors cannot continue (auditing) if they have done three years. I think in the case of most companies (non-bank lenders), the auditors would have already done more than three years, probably done four years… So, I hope that RBI defers this applicability by year or so because the year has already started, and a lot of them would have to start looking around for new audit firms,” Keki Mistry, MD and Vice Chairman Keki Mistry had told ETCFO.

“Many challenges here if implemented from FY22. Some bank auditors have already finished three years — they will only have weeks to make a new selection. The pool available to choose from will be limited for FY22 and many potential suitors would be conflicted under the new one-year cooling-off period having done such non-audit services in FY21,” Grant Thornton Bharat CEO Vishesh Chandiok had said.

Audit trail software

Earlier this year, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs had to defer by a year amendments to the companies accounts rules requiring firms to use accounting software that include features that can record the audit trail of each transaction.

Companies and auditors had cited little time left for the fiscal to end for them to shift to another software.

The second amendment to the Companies Accounts Rules, 2014, made the previous changes effective from April 1, 2022, according to the notification. The ministry had made the changes, to be effective from the start of the current fiscal, with the objective of curbing backdated entries by firms in the books of accounts.

“…for the financial year commencing on or after the 1st day of April 2021, every company which uses accounting software for maintaining its books of account, shall use only such accounting software which has a feature of recording audit trail of each and every transaction, creating an edit log of each change made in books of account along with the date when such changes were made and ensuring that the audit trail cannot be disabled,” the amendment made on March 25 had said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PM-KISAN 8th Instalment: PM Modi To Release Financial Benefit On 14th May

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Planning

oi-Sneha Kulkarni

|

Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi will release the eighth instalment of financial benefits under the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN) scheme via video conference on May 14th at 11 a.m. More than Rs. 19,000 crores will be transferred to more than 9.5 crore farmer families as a result of this. During the event, the Prime Minister will interact with farmer-beneficiaries.

The Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi is a Central Sector Scheme that will provide income support to all landholding farmers’ families in the country to help them meet their financial needs for agricultural and allied inputs, as well as domestic needs.
On December 25, 2020, the scheme’s seventh instalment was released.

PM-KISAN 8th Instalment: PM Modi To Release Financial Benefit On 14th May

The PM-KISAN scheme provides eligible beneficiary farmer families with a yearly financial benefit of 6000 rupees, payable in three equal four-monthly instalments of 2,000 rupees each. The funds are transferred directly to the beneficiaries’ bank accounts.

Union minister Piyush Goyal announced the PM Kisan Samman Nidhi Yojana during the 2019 interim Union Budget. After going into effect in December 2019, the scheme has cost the government 75,000 crores per year.

The funds are transferred directly to the beneficiaries bank accounts. So far, over Rs. 1.15 lakh crores in Samman Rashi has been transferred to farmer families under this scheme.

The financial benefit under the scheme will be credited directly to beneficiaries’ bank accounts. Beneficiaries must provide their bank account details as well as their Aadhaar numbers in order for the financial benefit under the scheme to be credited directly to their bank accounts. If bank account information is not provided, no benefit can be given.

PM-Kisan Helpline No. 155261 / 011-24300606, 011-23381092



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Ess Kay Fincorp raises ₹337 crore in Series E funding

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Ess Kay Fincorp Ltd, a non-banking finance company, has raised ₹337 crore in a Series E funding from TPG Growth, Norwest Venture Partners and Evolvence. The company’s promoter Rajendra Setia also invested in this round.

With this investment, the firm has raised over ₹1,000 crore of external capital from marquee investors.

Akshay Tanna, Partner, TPG Growth, said “This is our third round of investment in the company in the last 2.5 years and we continue to be strong believers in Ess Kay’s business model that bridges the large credit gap that exists for un-banked and under-banked populations in India. The strength of the founder and management team has allowed the company to navigate several disruptions along its journey, creating a successful rural focused lending platform in India. We are excited to strengthen our relationship with Ess Kay and look forward to continuing to work with the team to build on Ess Kay’s long-term success”.

Spark Capital was the financial adviser to the company, Ess Kay Fincorp said in a statement.

Rajendra Setia, Managing Director of Ess Kay, said, “Over the years, we have created a niche positioning for ourselves in the rural and semi-urban markets with deep distribution across North, West and Central India, on-ground sales and collection infrastructure to cater to the underserved customer segment, strong underwriting and focus on asset quality”.

“We are grateful to our existing investors – TPG Growth, Norwest Venture Partners & Evolvence for their continued support and confidence on Ess Kay. They, along with Baring India and our 45 lending relationships, add tremendous strength to our balance sheet and growth plans, as we emerge as a leading player in the used vehicle finance and SME finance segment,” he added.

Also Read: TPG Growth leads $ 33 million equity investment in Ess Kay Fincorp

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Retail loans constitute large share of loan recast by private banks

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Even as Resolution 2.0 announced by the Reserve Bank of India is expected to help small borrowers tide over the current economic uncertainty, trends from the restructuring scheme last year indicate that retail customers were the ones to benefit most from it.

Data released by banks along with their fourth quarter results show that loans by retail borrowers dominated the loan restructuring scheme of last year, while only a few companies used the benefit.

Also read: RBI allows lenders to revamp MSME accounts under Covid-19 related stress

Private sector lender HDFC Bank’s total restructuring was for 3.36 lakh accounts, amounting to ₹6,508.37 crore, of which 2.87 lakh accounts were for retail loans amounting to ₹5,456 crore.

Similarly, the total restructuring by Axis Bank amounted to ₹844.6 crore, of which retail loans accounted for ₹503.71 crore. Kotak Mahindra Bank restructured loans worth ₹121.5 crore, of which ₹82.38 crore were for retail borrowers.

ICICI Bank, YES Bank and IDBI Bank were among the outliers where the amount of corporate loans restructured was higher.

In the case of ICICI Bank, the total loan recast was for 1,624 accounts, of which 1,586 were retail accounts and just 30 were corporate accounts. However, in terms of exposure, retail loan restructuring amounted to ₹643.19 crore, while corporate loan recasts were higher at ₹1,323.28 crore.

For YES Bank, the number of accounts as well as exposure to corporate loans under the recast scheme were higher compared to retail accounts and loans.

Of the total loan recast of ₹1,112.21 crore by YES Bank, corporate loans accounted for 352 accounts valued at ₹940.11 crore.

However, the overall restructuring of loans was low for most private sector banks and they have already made sufficient provisions.

Also read: Covid support for Individuals and Small Biz: RBI asks lenders to frame policies within a month

“We note that the bulk of slippages in 2020-21 has come from retail and MSMEs. Higher restructuring was also availed by both these segments. Among banks, large ones have seen sub-1 per cent restructuring of loans, while mid-size private banks and small finance banks have seen higher loan restructuring,” said Emkay Global Financial Services in a note.

More data will be available on the restructuring trends once public sector lenders also announce their fourth quarter results.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Akshaya Tritiya 2021: Best Ways To Invest In Gold Online 2021

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Digital Gold

Digital gold is kept in vaults and stored online. You can buy gold digitally based on its weight or by specifying the amount of money you want to spend. The government-owned MMTC is issuing the Digital Gold in collaboration with PAMP of Switzerland, a global leader in bullion branding. PhonePe, Paytm, SafeGold, Google Pay, MobiKwik, and other mobile e-wallets, as well as online banking apps and websites, offer digital gold. You should take a close look at digital gold as an asset class. It’s not just about the allure of gold; it’s also about the security and protection that Digital Gold provides with minimal effort. These transactions can be used to sell digital gold and obtain liquid cash. Alternatively, you can get your money back by buying the gold you bought in physical form. Digital gold investment is treated similarly to physical gold ownership for all tax purposes. The amount of tax you must pay is determined by the holding period.

Gold ETFs

Gold ETFs

An exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the domestic physical gold price is known as a gold-backed ETF. Gold-backed ETFs are financial instruments that are made up of paper or dematerialized units backed by physical gold. One gramme of physical gold is typically backed by one gold-backed ETF unit. These funds claim to be backed by gold that is 99.5 percent pure, there is less concern about gold purity than in other contexts. Prices for gold-backed ETFs can be found on the NSE website, and they can be purchased or sold through a broker when trading takes place on the Stock Exchange. It’s worth noting that, unlike jewellery, gold-backed ETF units can be purchased and sold at the same price across the country.

Gold Mutual Funds

Gold Mutual Funds

Gold Mutual Funds are investment vehicles that invest primarily in gold ETFs and related assets. Although Gold Mutual Funds do not invest directly in physical gold, they do so indirectly through Gold ETFs. It’s just as simple to invest in gold funds as it is in mutual funds. One reason is that, unlike gold ETFs, gold funds do not require a demat account to invest. Plus, with a Systematic Investment Plan, you can divide the total investment amount into monthly instalments (SIP). You can take advantage of rupee cost averaging this way. You can structure your gold fund investments by investing in SIPs. To begin investing, you do not need a large sum of money. You can begin investing with as little as Rs 100 per month. As your income rises, you may want to consider increasing your investment.

Sovereign Gold Bonds

Sovereign Gold Bonds

SGBs are issued by the Indian government at various times. Investors can subscribe to SGBs at any time after the issue is announced. On allotment, investors can invest in gold bond certificates in denominations of 1 gram. They receive the value of gold at the time of redemption based on the simple average closing price for the previous three business days. During the term of the bond, the investors receive a fixed predetermined rate of interest. Whenever an SGB issue is launched, investors can apply directly or through bank branches, post offices, SCHIL, or authorized stock exchanges. The bonds are limited to 500 grams and can only be purchased by Indian residents or entities.

Comparison of Gold Investments

Comparison of Gold Investments

Comparison of Gold Investments

Gold Investment Minimum Investment (approximate price) Key Charges (Approx)
Physical Gold Rs 6,000 for a minimum 1 gm of gold
  • Design/Making Charges -10%
  • Bank Storage charges -3% to 4%
  • GST – 3% of purchase price
Digital Gold Rs 5,000 for a minimum 1 gm of gold
  • GST -3% of purchase price
  • Spread will be around 6%
Gold ETF Rs 5,000
  • Total costs of 0.5% to 1% annually
Gold Mutual Funds Starting at Rs 100
  • Total costs of 0.6% to 1.20% annually
Sovereign Gold Bonds Rs 5,000

Conclusion

Conclusion

Physical gold and digital gold investments are not recommended due to the various risks involved as well as the significantly high buy-sell spreads. If you plan to invest for a period of 5 years or longer, Sovereign Gold Bonds are the best option. Finally, these bonds are tax-free when redeemed at maturity, which is after eight years. If you only want to invest in gold for a short period of time, say less than three years, you can use Gold Mutual Funds or Gold ETFs, which have a lot of liquidity and availability.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 58 59 60 61 62 100