Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India invites E-Tender for Design, Supply, Installation, Testing and Commissioning of Grid Interactive (through Net-Metering) 25 KWp SPV based Solar Plant for Bank’s Residential Colony, Aliganj, Lucknow. The tendering would be done through the e-Tendering portal of MSTC Ltd (http://mstcecommerce.com/eprochome/rbi). All interested companies/agencies/firms must register themselves with MSTC Ltd through the above mentioned website to participate in the tendering process. The Schedule of e-Tender is as follows:

E-Tender No. RBI/Lucknow/Estate/498/20-21/ET/771
Mode Of Tender E-tender (Online Part I – Techno-Commercial Bid and Part II – Price Bid through www.mstcecommerce.com/eprochome/rbi)
Estimated Cost Rs. 12.50 lakh
Date of NIT (Notice Inviting Tender) available to parties for download 12:00 PM of May 24, 2021 onwards
Date by which the pre-bid queries shall be entertained through e-mail by Estate Department, RBI, Lucknow June 05, 2021
(i) EMD through DD/NEFT and intimate/forward the transaction details (UTR number in case of NEFT) to milanmangal@rbi.org.in, edlucknow@rbi.org.in and upload www.mstcecommerce.com/eprochome/rbi(ii) Tender Fees- (NIL) Rs. 25,000.00
Last Date of submission of EMD 14:00 PM of June 15, 2021
Date of Starting of e-Tender for submission of on line Techno-Commercial Bid and price Bid 14:00 PM of May 24, 2021 onwards
Date of closing of online e-tender for submission of techno-commercial bid & price bid 14:00 PM of June 15, 2021
Date of opening of Part-I (techno-commercial bid) 15:00 PM of June 15, 2021
Date of opening of Part-II (price bid) Shall be informed separately to parties
Transaction fee Rs. 1180/- (i/c GST) Payment of Transaction fee through MSTC payment gateway /NEFT/RTGS in favour of MSTC LIMITED

Intending tenderers shall pay as earnest money a sum of Rs.25,000/- by way of NEFT to Reserve Bank of India, Lucknow or by a Demand Draft in favour of Reserve Bank of India payable at Lucknow.

Applicants intending to apply will have to satisfy the Bank by furnishing documentary evidence in support of their possessing required eligibility and in the event of their failure to do so, the Bank reserves the right to reject their bids. Tenders without EMD will not be accepted under any circumstances.

The Bank is not bound to accept the lowest tender and reserves the right to accept either in full or in part any tender. The Bank also reserves the right to reject all the tenders without assigning any reason thereof.

Any amendments / corrigendum to the tender, if any, issued in future will only be notified on the RBI Website/MSTC Website as given above and will not be published in the newspaper.

Regional Director
Reserve Bank of India
Lucknow

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IDBI Bank has transformed into a retail bank: Samuel Joseph, Dy MD

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


During the four years that IDBI Bank was under prompt corrective action (PCA), it transformed itself from a predominantly corporate bank to a retail bank. And the Bank, which exited PCA on March 10, 2021, would like to keep it that way, according to Samuel Joseph J, Deputy Managing Director. In an interaction with BusinessLine, he emphasised that it had aggressively accelerated provisioning, over and above the regulatory requirement, in the past to strengthen its balance sheet. So, write back to profits in the next two to three years, whenever the recovery from stressed assets happens, will be about ₹7,500 crore. Excerpts:

Now that your bank is free from the shackles of PCA, how does it plan to grow business?

During the period that we were under PCA, we were consolidating our position. We completely revamped our risk management policies, especially concerning corporate credit. So, everything was ready (for growing business) before we exited PCA. But unfortunately, the exit coincided with lockdown and related economic uncertainty. However, we will be able to expand our book in FY22. We propose to grow our corporate loan book by 8-10 per cent and our retail book by 10-12 per cent.

There is an impression that our Bank is a corporate bank. But if you look at our March 2021 numbers, our corporate to the retail ratio in the overall loan book was 38:62. This is a significant shift from where we were three-four years ago when the ratio was 60:40.

Going forward, we would like to keep the corporate book at about 40-45 per cent and the retail book at about 55-60 per cent.

And even on the liabilities side, we have transformed our liabilities franchise, and today our CASA (current account, savings account) is 50.45 per cent of total deposits. Even within term deposits, our reliance on bulk deposits is less than 15 per cent. Three years back, CASA was at about 37 per cent.

So, we have used the PCA period well to completely transform our business mix and strengthen the balance sheet.

How did you strengthen the balance sheet?

The first thing was recognition of non-performing assets (NPAs). We made aggressive provisioning for the NPAs and took the hit upfront on our Profit & Loss (P&L) account. So, today, our provision coverage ratio is at 96.9 per cent. The huge losses in 2019-20 were all because of aggressive accelerated provisioning. This was not required as per the regulatory norms, which give banks a gliding scale (for provisioning). Going by this, 96.9 per cent provisioning is not required at all. But we made accelerated provisioning to absorb the pain upfront. So, though the Gross Non-Performing Assets (NPA) ratio is slightly elevated at 22.37 per cent, the net NPA ratio is only 1.97 per cent as of March-end 2021.

We have not aggressively written off NPAs in the past because of the uncertainty relating to future profitability. But now that we have made five quarters of profit, we are fairly certain. Of course, we will wait for the Covid uncertainty to clear up, promoter change and all that and then we should be able to bring down GNPA by writing off 100 per cent provided for accounts.

How much provision write-back can you get from recoveries?

Our Gross NPAs are at about ₹36,000 crore. Technically written off (TWO) accounts already in our book aggregate to about ₹43,000 crore. So, both put together is about ₹79,000 crore. And this is about 97 per cent provided for….On average, let us say, we recover about 15 per cent. So, on ₹79,000 crore, we will be able to recover about ₹11,850 crore. Now, let us take a more conservative estimate — say, we recover only about ₹10,000 crore. Our net NPAs are only ₹2,500 crore because of aggressive provisioning. So, provision write-back to profits in the next two to three years, whenever the recovery happens, will be about ₹7,500 crore. The future (profit) potential of this aggressive past provisioning will at least be ₹7,000 crore to ₹7,500 crore going forward in the next two to three years.

Our Capital to Risk-weighted Assets Ratio (CRAR) is 15.59 per cent. So, from now on, we will be able to recoup our capital and increase CRAR much further. So, this is what we have done — on the P&L part, we have absorbed the pain upfront, and we have strengthened our balance sheet to recoup our capital through recovery and write-back to profits in the next two to three years.

Did you zero in on the stressed assets you will transfer to the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd?

We have identified the stressed assets for the transfer. The criteria for the transfer is that they should have been 100 per cent provided for, not be categorised as fraud, and it should not be very close to a resolution or recovery. Using these filters, we have identified the assets. We have a list of 11 accounts aggregating about ₹12,000 crore to be transferred to NARCL.

The immediate visual impact of this transfer on our balance sheet will be by way of a reduction in our Gross NPA ratio. Out of this ₹12,000 crore, some of the accounts may even be TWO accounts. The impact of TWO accounts is already reflected in our books. So, if out of ₹12,000 crore, Gross NPAs and TWO accounts amount to ₹6,000 crore each, then the GNPA could come down about 3.50 per cent.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HSBC CEO says Bitcoin not for us, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


HSBC has no plans to launch a cryptocurrency trading desk or offer the digital coins as an investment to customers, because they are too volatile and lack transparency, its Chief Executive Noel Quinn told Reuters.

Europe’s biggest bank’s stance on cryptocurrencies comes as the world’s biggest and best-known, Bitcoin, has tumbled nearly 50% from the year’s high, after China cracked down on mining the currency and prominent advocate Elon Musk tempered his support.

HSBC’s stance also contrasts with rival banks such as Goldman Sachs, which Reuters in March reported had restarted its cryptocurrency trading desk.

“Given the volatility we are not into Bitcoin as an asset class, if our clients want to be there then of course they are, but we are not promoting it as an asset class within our wealth management business,” Quinn said.

“For similar reasons we’re not rushing into stablecoins,” he said, referring to the digital currencies that seek to avoid the volatility associated with typical cryptocurrencies by pegging their value to assets such as the U.S. dollar.

Bitcoin traded at $34,464 on Monday, down nearly 50% in just 40 days from its year high of $64,895 on April 14.

Pressure on the currency intensified after the billionaire Tesla Chief Executive and cryptocurrency backer Musk reversed his stance on Tesla accepting Bitcoin as payment.

‘Difficult questions’

China, which is central to HSBC’s growth strategy, said last Tuesday that it had banned financial institutions and payment companies from providing services related to cryptocurrency transactions.

Reuters reported in April that HSBC had banned customers in its online share trading platform from buying shares in bitcoin-backed MicroStrategy, saying in a message to clients that it would not facilitate the buying or exchange of products related to virtual currencies.

Quinn said his sceptical stance on cryptocurrencies partly arose from the difficulty of assessing the transparency of who owns them, as well as problems with their ready convertibility into fiat money.

“I view Bitcoin as more of an asset class than a payments vehicle, with very difficult questions about how to value it on the balance sheet of clients because it is so volatile,” he said.

“Then you get to stablecoins which do have some reserve backing behind them to address the stored value concerns, but it depends on who the sponsoring organisation is plus the structure and accessibility of the reserve.”

The soaring popularity of cryptocurrencies has posed a problem for mainstream banks in recent years, as they try to balance catering to clients’ interest with their own regulatory obligations to understand the source of their customers’ wealth.

HSBC’s stance against offering cryptocurrencies as an asset class marks it out against European rivals such as UBS, which is exploring ways to offering them as an investment product according to media reports earlier this month.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Inside the race to avert disaster at China’s biggest ‘bad bank’, the Huarong Asset Management Co, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


It was past 9 p.m. on Financial Street in Beijing by the time the figure inside Huarong Tower there picked up an inkbrush and, with practiced strokes, began to set characters to paper.

Another trying workday was ending for Wang Zhanfeng, corporate chairman, Chinese Communist Party functionary—and, less happily, replacement for a man who very recently had been executed.

On this April night, Wang was spotted unwinding as he often does in his office: practicing the art of Chinese calligraphy, a form that expresses the beauty of classical characters and, it is said, the nature of the person who writes them.

Its mastery requires patience, resolve, skill, calm—and Wang, 54, needs all that and more. Because here on Financial Street, a brisk walk from the hulking headquarters of the People’s Bank of China, a dark drama is playing out behind the mirrored façade of Huarong Tower. How it unfolds will test China’s vast, debt-ridden financial system, the technocrats working to fix it, and the foreign banks and investors caught in the middle.

Welcome to the headquarters of China Huarong Asset Management Co., the troubled state-owned ‘bad bank’ that has set teeth on edge around the financial world.

For months now Wang and others have been trying to clean up the mess here at Huarong, an institution that sits—quite literally—at the center of China’s financial power structure. To the south is the central bank, steward of the world’s second-largest economy; to the southwest, the Ministry of Finance, Huarong’s principal shareholder; less than 300 meters to the west, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, entrusted with safeguarding the financial system and, of late, ensuring Huarong has a funding backstop from state-owned banks until at least August.

The patch though doesn’t settle the question of how Huarong makes good on some $41 billion borrowed on the bond markets, most incurred under Wang’s predecessor before he was ensnared in a sweeping crackdown on corruption. That long-time executive, Lai Xiaomin, was put to death in January—his formal presence expunged from Huarong right down to the signature on its stock certificates.

The bigger issue is what all this might portend for the nation’s financial system and efforts by China’s leader, Xi Jinping, to centralize control, rein in years of risky borrowing and set the nation’s financial house in order.

“They’re damned if they do and damned if they don’t,” said Michael Pettis, a Beijing-based professor of finance at Peking University and author of Avoiding the Fall: China’s Economic Restructuring. Bailing out Huarong would reinforce the behavior of investors who ignore risk, he said, while a default endangers financial stability if a “chaotic” repricing of the bond market ensues.

Just what is going on inside Huarong Tower? Given the stakes, few are willing to discuss that question publicly. But interviews with people who work there, as well as at various Chinese regulators, provide a glimpse into the eye of this storm.

Huarong, simply put, has been in full crisis mode ever since it delayed its 2020 earnings results, eroding investor confidence. Executives have come to expect to be summoned by government authorities at a moment’s notice whenever market sentiment sours and the price of Huarong debt sinks anew. Wang and his team must provide weekly written updates on Huarong’s operations and liquidity. They have turned to state-owned banks, pleading for support, and reached out to bond traders to try to calm nerves, with little lasting success.

In public statements, Huarong has insisted repeatedly that its position is ultimately sound and that it will honor its obligations. Banking regulators have had to sign off on the wording of those statements—another sign of how serious the situation is considered and, ultimately, who’s in charge.

Then there are regular audiences with the finance ministry and the other powerful financial bureaucracies nearby. Among items usually on the agenda: possible plans to hive off various Huarong businesses.

The bigger issue is what all this might portend for the nation’s financial system and efforts by China’s leader, Xi Jinping, to centralize control, rein in years of risky borrowing and set the nation’s financial house in order.

Huarong executives are often kept waiting and, people familiar with the meetings say, tend to gain only limited access to top officials at the CBIRC, the banking overseer.

The country’s apex financial watchdog—chaired by Liu He, Xi’s right-hand man in overseeing the economy and financial system—has asked for briefings on the Huarong situation and coordinated meetings between regulators, according to regulatory officials. But it has yet to communicate to them a long-term solution, including whether to impose losses on bondholders, the officials said.

Representatives at the People’s Bank of China, the CBIRC, Huarong and the Ministry of Finance didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Focus on Basics

A mid-level party functionary with a PhD in finance from China’s reputed Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Wang arrived at Huarong Tower in early 2018, just as the corruption scandal was consuming the giant asset management company. He is regarded inside Huarong as low-key and down-to-earth, particularly in comparison to the company’s previous leader, Lai, a man once known as the God of Wealth.

Hundreds of Huarong staff, from Beijing division chiefs to branch employees in faraway outposts, listened in on April 16 as Wang reviewed the quarterly numbers. He stressed that the company’s fundamentals had improved since he took over, a view shared by some analysts though insufficient to pacify investors. But he had little to say about what is on so many minds: plans to restructure and shore up the giant company, which he’d pledged to clean up within three years of taking over.

His main message to the troops: focus on the basics, like collecting on iffy assets and improving risk management. The employees were silent. No one asked a question.

Representatives at the People’s Bank of China, the CBIRC, Huarong and the Ministry of Finance didn’t respond to requests for comment.

One employee characterized the mood in his area as business as usual. Another said co-workers at a Huarong subsidiary were worried the company might not be able to pay their salaries. There’s a widening gulf between the old guard and new, said a third staffer. Those who outlasted Lai and have seen their compensation cut year after year have little confidence in the turnaround, while new joiners are more hopeful about the opportunities the change of direction offers.

Others joke that Huarong Tower must suffer from bad feng shui: after Lai was arrested, a bank that had a branch in the building had to be bailed out to the tune of $14 billion.

Dark humor aside, a rough consensus has begun to emerge among senior management and mid-level regulators: like other key state-owned enterprises, Huarong still appears to be considered too big to fail. Many have come away with the impression—and it is that, an impression—that for now, at least, the Chinese government will stand behind Huarong.

At the very least, these people say, no serious financial tumult, such as a default by Huarong, is likely to be permitted while the Chinese Communist Party is planning a nationwide spectacle to celebrate the 100th anniversary of its founding on July 1. Those festivities will give Xi—who has been positioning to stay in power indefinitely—an opportunity to cement his place among China’s most powerful leaders including Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping.

Huarong is “nowhere near” defaulting, the managing editor of Caixin Media wrote in an opinion piece on Saturday. Neither the Ministry of Finance nor Chinese regulators would allow it, Ling Huawei wrote.

What will come after that patriotic outpouring on July 1 is uncertain, even to many inside Huarong Tower. Liu He, China’s vice premier and chair of the powerful Financial Stability and Development Committee, appears in no hurry to force a difficult solution. Silence from Beijing has started to rattle local debt investors, who until about a week ago had seemed unmoved by the sell-off in Huarong’s offshore bonds.

Competing Interests

Huarong’s role in absorbing and disposing of lenders’ soured debt is worth preserving to support the banking sector cleanup, but requires government intervention, according to Dinny McMahon, an economic analyst for Beijing-based consultancy Trivium China and author of China’s Great Wall of Debt.

“We anticipate that foreign bondholders will be required to take a haircut, but it will be relatively small,” he said. “It will be designed to signal that investors should not assume government backing translates into carte blanche support.”

For now, in the absence of direct orders from the top, Huarong has been caught in the middle of the competing interests among various state-owned enterprises and government bureaucracies.

China Investment Corp., the $1 trillion sovereign fund, for instance, has turned down the idea of taking a controlling stake from the finance ministry. CIC officials have argued they don’t have the bandwidth or capability to fix Huarong’s problems, according to people familiar with the matter.

The People’s Bank of China, meantime, is still trying to decide whether to proceed with a proposal that would see it assume more than 100 billion yuan ($15.5 billion) of bad assets from Huarong, those people said.

And the Ministry of Finance, which owns 57% of Huarong on behalf of the Chinese government, hasn’t committed to recapitalizing the company, though it hasn’t ruled it out, either, one person said.

CIC didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The banking regulator has bought Huarong some time, brokering an agreement with state-owned lenders including Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. that would cover any funding needed to repay the equivalent of $2.5 billion coming due by the end of August. By then, the company aims to have completed its 2020 financial statements after spooking investors by missing deadlines in March and April.

“How China deals with Huarong will have wide ramifications on global investors’ perception of and confidence in Chinese SOEs,” said Wu Qiong, a Hong Kong-based executive director at BOC International Holdings. “Should any defaults trigger a reassessment of the level of government support assumed in rating SOE credits, it would have deep repercussions for the offshore market.”

The announcement of a new addition to Wang’s team underscores the stakes and, to some insiders, provides a measure of hope. Liang Qiang is a standing member of the All-China Financial Youth Federation, widely seen as a pipeline to groom future leaders for financial SOEs. Liang, who arrived at Huarong last week and will soon take on the role of president, has worked for the three other big state asset managers that were established, like Huarong, to help clean up bad debts at the nation’s banks. Some speculate this points to a wider plan: that Huarong might be used as a blueprint for how authorities approach these other sprawling, debt-ridden institutions.

Meantime, inside Huarong Tower, a key item remains fixed in the busy schedules of top executives and rank-and-file employees alike. It is a monthly meeting, the topic of which is considered vital to Huarong’s rebirth: studying the doctrines of the Chinese Communist Party and speeches of President Xi Jinping.

(Updates to mention Caixin managing editor’s opinion piece on the matter. )



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PNB Doorstep Banking: How To Get Cash Delivered To Your Home?

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Planning

oi-Sneha Kulkarni

|

The charges for Doorstep Banking at Punjab National Bank (PNB) have been reduced for its customers. Customers of PNB will now just have to pay Rs 50 to get cash via Doorstep Banking. PNB announced the charge reduction in a tweet on its official account.

Customers can withdraw cash using the DSP app, website, or by calling a toll-free number, among other financial services. The customer’s bank account number must be connected to Aadhaar for this to work, or the user may use his or her bank debit card. Micro-ATM service will be provided by the handler. The transaction minimum and maximum limits are Rs 1,000 and Rs 10,000, respectively.

PNB Doorstep Banking: How To Get Cash Delivered To Your Home?

PNB: How to get cash delivered to your home?

Step 1: You will be asked to register with the 1800-10-37-188 or 1800-12-13-721 free tariff number for cash, or by logging into www.psbDsb.in to obtain cash delivered at home.

Step 2: Choose the Cash withdrawal option
Step 3: Enter an address for pickup/dro
Step 4:Select the branch
Step 5: Select the time slot for cash delivery
Step 6: Check the service fee on the screen
Step 6: Verify the same
Step 7: Details such as the bank worker’s name, number, etc. who comes to your home are sent through message.

In the midst of the COVID-19 second wave, banks offer their customers numerous facilities. Now customers don’t have to go to bank branches for a range of services, since they can utilised the services from mobile or phone banking comfortably.
.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

New Cryptocurrencies That Are Also Among The Most Tracked By Investors

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


1. StopElon:

This was the crypto which originated after investors shown their aggression or hate towards Elon Musk on irrationally influencing the price of cryptocurrency bitcoin and other altcoins. Now as per the Laptomag site, the coin can be purchased from PancakeSwap using the Trustwallet app. All a buyer needs is a Binance coin (BNB).

2.	Polygon (MATIC):

2. Polygon (MATIC):

It is the original currency of Polygon or Matic Network cofounded by 3 Indian IT engineers. Polygon primarily works on addressing key issues that are linked to blockchain technology such as a higher gas fees as well as slow speed and that too without sacrificing on security.

Matic was among the currencies that traded positively when there was across the board sell-off in the cryptocurrency market. The top exchanges for trading in Polygon as per the site are Binance, Huobi Global, OKEx, FTX, and CoinTiger.

This cryptocurrency as per the coinmarketcap.com ranks 16th after first ranking as the top 20 cryptocurrencies.

3.	Shiba Inu(SHIB):

3. Shiba Inu(SHIB):

This cryptocurrency post Dogecoin huge rally came into existence and created a huge wave. Actually the cryptocurrency drew its name from a Dog called SHIBA INU which pushed several of the investors to invest in cryptotokens. Also know as ‘Doge Killer’ it was to be listed on their own exchange, ShibaSwap. As per the website as much as 50% of the token is locked on Uniswap, while the remaining 50 percent was destroyed by Vitalik Buterin.

4.	Snoop Doge:

4. Snoop Doge:

The token is influenced by strains of OGE including HOGE, WOGE etc. The digital token along with other partners can serve as a collateral in establishing real-world synthetics associated with cannabis stocks & assets. There is not given the m-cap for this digital coin on the site plus only the total tokens in supply is available which is at 42,000,069.

5.	Graviton:

5. Graviton:

This crypto can be traded on UniSwap and has a coinmarketcap ranking of 5271. Notably, cryptocurrency’s market cap is calculated by multiplying the number of coins minted with the price and this is crucial in the crypto world as it gives an idea of the crypto valuation. Also, these are an indication of the cryptocurrencies’ dominance in a universe of other currencies.

6.	SafeMoon:

6. SafeMoon:

This is another meme coin and is a Defi or decentralized finance token. As per the Coinmarket cap site is a combination of RFI tokenomics and an auto-liquidity generating protocol. SafeMoon as per reports shall come up with a non-fungible token (NFT) exchange, as well as charity projects and crypto educational apps. This crypto was launched in March 2021. SafeMoon similar to StopElon can be bought on PancakeSwap and also BitMart.

7.	Zoo Token:

7. Zoo Token:

This token is also among the most viewed tokens on the Coinmarketcap.com. Coins with animal names have also create a frenzy in the financial world Now ZooToken shall work as the centre for these Animal Coins” key-values.

 New cryptocurrencies’ drawing huge investor interest with m-cap etc.

New cryptocurrencies’ drawing huge investor interest with m-cap etc.

Cryptocurrency Symbol Price as on Coinmarketcap M-cap % gains in the last 24 hour Circulating supply
Polygon MATIC $1.43 $8,817,579,802 42 6.16B MATIC
Shiba Inu SHIB $.0000084 $3,348,344,780 7.00% 394,796.00B SHIB
Snoop Doge SNOGE $0.07005 (-36%)
Graviton GTON $6.24 (6%)
SafeMoon SAFEMOON “$0.000004402 $2,514,199,535 0.29% 585,536.37B SAFEMOON
ZOOToken ZOOT (-47%)

While there have been added some of the cryptos today such as Dick on the Coinmarketcap.com there is no price change for them so not mentioned here. Also, for some of them which have been added just 3-4 days back on the exchange, there is no market cap. Nonetheless for collating the data we have included all such new cryptocurrencies that are popular as well as most searched.

GoodReturns.in



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less



(Amount in ₹ crore, Rate in Per cent)

  Volume
(One Leg)
Weighted
Average Rate
Range
A. Overnight Segment (I+II+III+IV) 0.00
     I. Call Money 0.00
     II. Triparty Repo 0.00
     III. Market Repo 0.00
     IV. Repo in Corporate Bond 0.00
B. Term Segment      
     I. Notice Money** 0.00
     II. Term Money@@ 0.00
     III. Triparty Repo 0.00
     IV. Market Repo 0.00
     V. Repo in Corporate Bond 0.00
  Auction Date Tenor (Days) Maturity Date Amount Current Rate /
Cut off Rate
C. Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF) & Marginal Standing Facility (MSF)
I. Today’s Operations
1. Fixed Rate          
     (i) Repo          
     (ii) Reverse Repo Sun, 23/05/2021 1 Mon, 24/05/2021 1,213.00 3.35
     (iii) Special Reverse Repo~          
2. Variable Rate&          
  (I) Main Operation          
     (a) Reverse Repo          
  (II) Fine Tuning Operations          
     (a) Repo          
     (b) Reverse Repo
3. MSF Sun, 23/05/2021 1 Mon, 24/05/2021 20.00 4.25
4. Special Long-Term Repo Operations (SLTRO) for Small Finance Banks (SFBs)£          
5. Net liquidity injected from today’s operations
[injection (+)/absorption (-)]*
      -1,193.00  
II. Outstanding Operations
1. Fixed Rate          
     (i) Repo          
     (ii) Reverse Repo Sat, 22/05/2021 2 Mon, 24/05/2021 9,956.00 3.35
  Fri, 21/05/2021 3 Mon, 24/05/2021 2,50,181.00 3.35
     (iii) Special Reverse Repo~ Fri, 21/05/2021 14 Fri, 04/06/2021 5.00 3.75
2. Variable Rate&          
  (I) Main Operation          
     (a) Reverse Repo Fri, 21/05/2021 14 Fri, 04/06/2021 2,00,016.00 3.47
  (II) Fine Tuning Operations          
     (a) Repo          
     (b) Reverse Repo          
3. MSF Sat, 22/05/2021 2 Mon, 24/05/2021 3,037.00 4.25
  Fri, 21/05/2021 3 Mon, 24/05/2021 494.00 4.25
4. Long-Term Repo Operations# Mon, 17/02/2020 1095 Thu, 16/02/2023 499.00 5.15
  Mon, 02/03/2020 1094 Wed, 01/03/2023 253.00 5.15
  Mon, 09/03/2020 1093 Tue, 07/03/2023 484.00 5.15
  Wed, 18/03/2020 1094 Fri, 17/03/2023 294.00 5.15
5. Targeted Long Term Repo Operations^ Fri, 27/03/2020 1092 Fri, 24/03/2023 12,236.00 4.40
  Fri, 03/04/2020 1095 Mon, 03/04/2023 16,925.00 4.40
  Thu, 09/04/2020 1093 Fri, 07/04/2023 18,042.00 4.40
  Fri, 17/04/2020 1091 Thu, 13/04/2023 20,399.00 4.40
6. Targeted Long Term Repo Operations 2.0^ Thu, 23/04/2020 1093 Fri, 21/04/2023 7,950.00 4.40
7. On Tap Targeted Long Term Repo Operations Mon, 22/03/2021 1095 Thu, 21/03/2024 5,000.00 4.00
8. Special Long-Term Repo Operations (SLTRO) for Small Finance Banks (SFBs)£ Mon, 17/05/2021 1095 Thu, 16/05/2024 400.00 4.00
D. Standing Liquidity Facility (SLF) Availed from RBI$       1,662.00  
E. Net liquidity injected from outstanding operations [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*     -3,72,483.00  
F. Net liquidity injected (outstanding including today’s operations) [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*     -3,73,676.00  
G. Cash Reserves Position of Scheduled Commercial Banks
     (i) Cash balances with RBI as on 23/05/2021 5,95,240.36  
  22/05/2021 5,96,318.50  
     (ii) Average daily cash reserve requirement for the fortnight ending 04/06/2021 6,14,682.00  
H. Government of India Surplus Cash Balance Reckoned for Auction as on¥ 21/05/2021 0.00  
I. Net durable liquidity [surplus (+)/deficit (-)] as on 07/05/2021 7,41,854.00  
@ Based on Reserve Bank of India (RBI) / Clearing Corporation of India Limited (CCIL).
– Not Applicable / No Transaction.
** Relates to uncollateralized transactions of 2 to 14 days tenor.
@@ Relates to uncollateralized transactions of 15 days to one year tenor.
$ Includes refinance facilities extended by RBI.
& As per the Press Release No. 2019-2020/1900 dated February 06, 2020.
* Net liquidity is calculated as Repo+MSF+SLF-Reverse Repo.
# As per the Press Release No. 2020-2021/287 dated September 04, 2020.
^ As per the Press Release No. 2020-2021/605 dated November 06, 2020.
As per the Press Release No. 2020-2021/520 dated October 21, 2020, Press Release No. 2020-2021/763 dated December 11, 2020 and Press Release No. 2020-2021/1057 dated February 05, 2021.
¥ As per the Press Release No. 2014-2015/1971 dated March 19, 2015.
£ As per the Press Release No. 2021-2022/181 dated May 07, 2021.
~ As per the Press Release No. 2021-2022/177 dated May 07, 2021.
Ajit Prasad
Director   
Press Release: 2021-2022/262

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks file application in NCLAT on DHFL

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Administrator and lenders to troubled Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL) have filed two applications in the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).

These have been filed challenging the National Company Law Tribunal order which directed DHFL’s Committee of Creditors to consider the offer made by its former promoter Kapil Wadhawan within the next 10 days.

Sources said that there are concerns that such a move will derail the resolution process of DHFL and could also set a bad precedent.

In his second settlement offer, Wadhawan had offered ₹91,158 crore, which is over ₹50,000 crore more than the ₹34,250 crore being offered by Piramal Enterprises Ltd.

The CoC, led by Union Bank of India, in its application has asked that the May 19 order of the NCLT should be set aside. Further the NCLT should also clear the resolution plan for DHFL.

DHFL Administrator R Subramaniakumar filed his application challenging the NCLT order on May 23.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Notifications

[ad_1]

Read More/Less




April 14, 2015





Dear All




Welcome to the refurbished site of the Reserve Bank of India.





The two most important features of the site are: One, in addition to the default site, the refurbished site also has all the information bifurcated functionwise; two, a much improved search – well, at least we think so but you be the judge.





With this makeover, we also take a small step into social media. We will now use Twitter (albeit one way) to send out alerts on the announcements we make and YouTube to place in public domain our press conferences, interviews of our top management, events, such as, town halls and of course, some films aimed at consumer literacy.




The site can be accessed through most browsers and devices; it also meets accessibility standards.



Please save the url of the refurbished site in your favourites as we will give up the existing site shortly and register or re-register yourselves for receiving RSS feeds for uninterrupted alerts from the Reserve Bank.



Do feel free to give us your feedback by clicking on the feedback button on the right hand corner of the refurbished site.



Thank you for your continued support.




Department of Communication

Reserve Bank of India


Next

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Challenging year stares at microfinance sector: Ind-Ra

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India Ratings (Ind-Ra) said a sequential challenging year stares at the microfinance sector, with the impact of the credit costs on account of the second wave expected to be higher in the annual financials for FY22 than FY21.

The credit rating agency reiterated a Stable Outlook for large MFIs and a Negative Outlook for the rest for FY22.

With the second wave penetrating rural markets, Ind-Ra estimated collections for microfinance institutions (MFIs) and small finance banks (SFBs) to have declined 3-5 per cent in April 2021 and additional 5-7 per cent in May 2021 (first fortnight of the month), both on a month-on-month basis, as states implement stricter measures to manage the second Covid wave.

The agency expects the overall microfinance sector to witness a shortfall of 10-15 per cent in collections on a consolidated basis in May 2021.

“That being said, the variation among MFIs could be wider, depending on their level of concentration in regions where lifting of restrictions could be slow,” said Amit Rane, Senior Analyst, in a note.

Ind-Ra, in its microfinance outlook had estimated credit costs for MFIs to be in the range of 3-8 per cent in FY21 on account of the first Covid first wave as collections picked up in the pre-Covid portfolio and normalised for post September 2020 originations.

Portfolio deterioration

The agency observed that the incidence of most of the relevant provision will also fall in FY22, given that the bulk of the second wave portfolio deterioration would happen at the beginning of FY22.

As a consequence, the impact of the credit costs on account of the second wave would be higher in the annual financials for FY22 than FY21 and possibly even the demonetisation crisis; where credit costs were spread over three years as the event occurred at end-3QFY17 and the regulator provided forbearance for NPA recognition, it added.

Funding access critical

Ind-Ra believes smooth access to funding and liquidity would be critical for the microfinance sector.

It assessed that for most large MFIs (assets under management (AUM) above ₹5000 crore or MFIs that are part of large groups), bank funding lines etc. could continue and hence they may not face immediate liquidity stress.

Recently, the regulatory announcement of special long-term repo operations of ₹10,000 crore for SFBs and categorisation of lending by SFBs to MFIs under priority sector lending (for loans to MFIs of AUM ₹500 crore and less) is a step to ensure flow of liquidity to small MFIs, Ind-Ra said.

However, as per Ind-Ra’s analysis the portfolio of SFBs and their lending to MFIs with AUM of less than ₹500 crore billion is marginal.

Ind-Ra expects mid and small MFIs to continue to face challenges in fund raising and / or borrowing costs.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 25 26 27 28 29 100