After recapitalisation, IOB, Central Bank move closer to privatisation, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The government has infused Rs 14,500 crore, mainly into banks that are under the RBI’s prompt corrective action framework to improve their financial health.

Two of these banks, Indian Overseas Bank and Central Bank of India are among the four banks shortlisted by the government for privatisation.

Indian Overseas Bank, Central Bank of India and UCO Bank are currently under Reserve Bank of India’s prompt corrective action (PCA) framework that puts several restrictions on them, including on lending, management compensation and directors’ fees.

Capital infusion

Of the total infusion, Rs 11,500 crore has gone to these three banks under PCA while the remaining Rs 3,000 crore has been infused into Bank of India. According to a government notification, Rs 4,800 crore has been provided to Central Bank of India, Rs 4,100 crore to Indian Overseas Bank and Kolkata-based UCO Bank has got Rs 2,600 crore.Government Notification

The capital infusion will help these banks to come out of the Reserve Bank of India’s prompt corrective action framework.

Bringing the banks out of PCA could boost their valuations in the event of privatisation.

Central Bank of India has 33,000 staff, while Indian Overseas Bank employs 26,000.

The PCA status

All three banks under PCA Indian Overseas Bank, UCO Bank and Central Bank have reported net non-performing assets (NPAs) below levels that trigger PCA. However, on the proforma net NPA front, Central Bank falls short as its NNPA is 6.58% against the 6% required to be out of PCA.

Even after PCA exit, these banks may still be under RBI watch.

Most of the large state-owned lenders — including State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank, Union Bank of India, and Indian Bank — have already raised money from various market sources, including share sale on a private placement basis.

Rs 3.5 lakh crore bet

The government in the last five years, apart from merging some smaller banks with bigger ones, has spent Rs 3.5 lakh crore in the last five years on recapitalising public sector banks.

This has been financed partly by taxpayer money and partly recapitalisation bonds, including the discounted zero-coupon bonds sold to PSBs that are to be recapitalized.

Zero-coupon bonds

The government is unlikely to take zero-coupon bond route to further recapitalise public sector banks after the Reserve Bank expressed some concerns in this regard, sources said. The government, they said, would resort back to recapitalisation bonds bearing a coupon rate for capital infusion in these banks.

To save the interest burden and ease the fiscal pressure, the government last year decided to issue zero-coupon bonds for meeting the capital needs of the banks.

The first test case of the new mechanism was a capital infusion of Rs 5,500 crore into Punjab and Sind Bank by issuing zero-coupon bonds of six different maturities last year. These special securities with tenure of 10-15 years are non-interest bearing and valued at par.

However, the RBI raised some concerns with regard to the calculation of an effective capital infusion made in any bank through this instrument issued at par.

Since such bonds usually are non-interest bearing but issued at a deep discount to the face value, it is difficult to ascertain net present value.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Yes Bank takes over Anil Ambani’s Reliance Centre for ₹1,200 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Anil Ambani-backed Reliance Infrastructure Limited has sold its office Reliance Centre at Santacruz, Mumbai to YES Bank for ₹1,200 crore.

“Entire proceeds from sale of Reliance Centre, Santacruz is utilized only to repay the debt of YES Bank,” Reliance Infra said in a statement.

The office building is spread over a 21,432.28 square metre plot and housed Anil Ambani group’s headquarters.

The bank has also taken over another property of the group situated at Veer Nariman Road in Mumbai.

Last year, Yes Bank had said that it was taking possession of the properties under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, and comes for non-payment of loans amounting to ₹2,892 crore.

YES Bank had then said it had issued a demand notice on May 6, 2020 to Reliance Infrastructure Ltd under the SARFAESI Act to repay the dues within 60 days, which the latter failed to repay. ADAG is estimated to have an exposure of about ₹12,000 crore to YES Bank.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Not Received ITR Refund? Know-How To File ITR Complaint Online Directly

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


What is Income Tax Refund?

When you pay more in taxes than you owe, you will receive a refund including interest. Advance tax, self-assessment tax, tax deducted at source, foreign tax credit, and so on are all possibilities.

In many cases, you may have noticed that the refund amount you received is relatively better than the refund amount claimed on your tax return. Interest on a tax refund is represented by this difference. If the refund is 10% or more of the tax paid, the income tax department is required to pay this.

It’s possible that the department won’t pay you all of your refunds. If you owe taxes from a previous year and are due to a refund in a subsequent year, the income tax department may adjust your refund accordingly.

Here are some of the most common reasons for your return being delayed.

Here are some of the most common reasons for your return being delayed.

Old Account

This is one of the most common causes of refund delays. Following a change in jobs or salary accounts, many taxpayers forget to update their account numbers with the IRS. There may be a delay in processing your income tax refund if the income tax department is not updated with the most recent bank account information.

Deductions

There may be a delay if you fail to include any deductions, such as those provided under sections 80c and 80D of the Income Tax Act, or any other sections under which you wish to claim a deduction, and you may not be eligible for the same.

Not verifying online

It will take time to receive funds if you send a manual copy of your ITR-V to CPC Bangalore. Electronic Verification Code (EVC) can be used to quickly verify tax returns. There are different ways through which you can verify your tax return.

Fraud

Finally, unusual circumstances such as attempting to commit tax fraud, evading taxes, or committing any other criminally punishable offence may result in a delayed refund and additional prosecution.

How to Check the Status of Income Tax Refund?

How to Check the Status of Income Tax Refund?

Step 1: Visit the income tax e-filing portal

Step 2: Log in with user ID, password, and date of birth/date of incorporation

Step 3: Click on the ‘My Account’ tab

Step 4: Select the ‘Refund/Demand Status’ option

The status of your returns will be displayed, along with details such as the assessment year, payment method, and, if applicable, the reason for refund failure.

How to check the refund status on NSDL?

Step 1: Click on the refund status link on NSDL’s website

Step 2: Enter your PAN

Step 3: Select the relevant assessment year

Step 4: Enter Captcha Code.

How to file a complaint on Income Tax Refund online directly?

Step 1: Log in at direct link – https://www1.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/e-FilingGS/Services/ORM.html

Step 2: Enter your name, PAN details, Assessment Year, etc.

Step 3: Write your query in the description box

Step 4: You can select the social media type and enter the ID

Step 5: Enter CAPTCHA

Step 6: Click on the ‘Submit’ button

Your ITR refund grievance will get registered online.

Things to Consider

  • To process your refund request, the IT department may require additional documentation.
  • The department may send you a notice stating the amount of unpaid taxes. In this case, double-check all of your paperwork and recalculate your tax liability and refund due. If the figures you entered on the returns form are accurate, submit a rectification to back up your claim.
  • If the department believes your refund request is incorrect, you will receive a notice from them explaining why they believe it is incorrect.
  • If your returns have not yet been processed by the IT department, you can go ahead and revise them to include the missing deductions.
  • If your bank account information has changed, inform your assessing officer of the new account number and MICR code.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ICICI Bank and PhonePe partner to issue FASTag, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Private lender ICICI Bank and digital payments platform PhonePe have tied –up for the issuance of FASTag using UPI on the PhonePe App.

This integration allows over 280 million registered PhonePe users to order and track the ICICI Bank FASTag conveniently on the app.

ICICI Bank is the first bank to partner with PhonePe for the issuance of FASTag.

Sudipta Roy, Head – Unsecured Assets, ICICI Bank said, “This collaboration enables millions of PhonePe customers to easily apply for a new FASTag and get it delivered free of cost at their doorstep. The association comes in handy, even for users, who are not customers of ICICI Bank, as it allows them to order and later recharge with the convenience of UPI. With this, ICICI Bank has achieved another feat in the FASTag ecosystem.”

Roy added, “Our market leadership in value and volume of average daily transactions on FASTag is a testimony of the trust that customers have shown in our rollout. We believe that our latest tie-up with PhonePe will go a long way to make the availability of FASTag even more convenient, digital and frictionless.”

Deep Agrawal, Head – Payments, PhonePe said, “We have already seen a phenomenal response from our users recharging FASTag on our platform, with millions of customers recharging daily on the app. In fact, FASTag recharge has witnessed a 145% growth over the last 3 months indicating increased intercity travel as markets opened up post the lockdown.”

“We are confident that with PhonePe’s reach, superior payment and user experience, we will enable millions of consumers to purchase and use FASTag across the country,” said Agarwal.

Denny Thomas, Head NETC & AEPS, NPCI said, “The partnership of PhonePe and ICICI Bank will definitely increase the adoption of NETC FASTag and facilitate its doorstep delivery to the customers. We believe that this initiative will further deepen the penetration of FASTag across the country and provide the users with a seamless recharge experience through the PhonePe app.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Notifications

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


RBI/2021-22/01
DCM (NE) No.G-4/08.07.18/2021-22

April 01, 2021

The Chairman/ The Managing Director/
The Chief Executive Officer
All Banks

Madam / Dear Sir

Master Circular – Facility for Exchange of Notes and Coins

Please refer to the Master Circular DCM (NE) No.G-3/08.07.18/2020-21 dated July 01, 2020 containing instructions on the facility for exchange of notes and coins. A revised version of Master Circular on the subject is annexed for your information and necessary action. This Master Circular is placed on our website www.rbi.org.in.

Yours faithfully

(Ishan Shukla)
Chief General Manager

Encl: As above


Master Circular – Facility for Exchange of Notes and Coins dated April 01, 2021

1. Facility for Exchange of Notes and Coins at Bank Branches

(a) All branches of banks in all parts of the country are mandated to provide the following customer services, more actively and vigorously to the members of public so that there is no need for them to approach the RBI Regional Offices for this purpose:

(i) Issuing fresh / good quality notes and coins of all denominations,

(ii) Exchanging soiled / mutilated / defective notes,*

* Small Finance Banks and Payment Banks may exchange mutilated and defective notes at their option.

and

(iii) Accepting coins and notes either for transactions or exchange.

It will be preferable to accept coins, particularly, in the denominations of ₹1 and ₹2, by weighment. However, accepting coins packed in sachets of 100 each would perhaps be more convenient for the cashiers as well as the customers. Such sachets may be kept at the counters and made available to the customers.

(b) All branches should provide the above facilities to members of public without any discrimination on all working days. The scheme of providing exchange facility by a few select currency chest branches on one of the Sundays in a month will remain unchanged. The names and addresses of such bank branches should be available with the respective banks.

(c) The availability of the above-mentioned facilities at the bank branches should be given wide publicity for information of the public at large.

(d) None of the bank branches should refuse to accept small denomination notes and / or coins tendered at their counters. All coins in the denomination of 50 paise, ₹1, ₹2, ₹5, ₹10 and ₹20 of various sizes, theme and design issued from time to time by the Government of India continue to be legal tender.

2. Reserve Bank of India (Note Refund) Rules, 2009 [as Amended by Reserve Bank of India (Note Refund) Amendment Rules, 2018] – Delegation of Powers

(a) In terms of Section 28 read with Section 58 (2) of Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, no person is entitled as a right to recover from the Government of India or RBI the value of any lost, stolen, mutilated or imperfect currency note of the GOI or banknote. However, with a view to mitigating the hardship to the public in genuine cases, it has been provided that the RBI may, with the previous sanction of the Central Government, prescribe the circumstances in, and the conditions and limitations subject to which, the value of such currency notes or banknotes may be refunded as a matter of grace.

(b) With a view to extending the facility for the benefit and convenience of public, all branches of banks have been delegated powers under Rule 2(j) of Reserve Bank of India (Note Refund) Rules, 2009 [as Amended by Reserve Bank of India (Note Refund) Amendment Rules, 2018] (hereinafter referred to as NRR, 2009) for exchange of mutilated / defective notes free of cost.

(c) The NRR, 2009 were amended to enable the public to exchange mutilated notes in Mahatma Gandhi (New) series, which are smaller in size compared to the earlier series. The minimum area of the single largest undivided piece of the note required for payment of full value for notes of rupees fifty and above denominations were also revised. The Reserve Bank of India (Note Refund) Amendment Rules, 2018 have since been notified in the Gazette of India on September 6, 2018.

3. Liberalized Definition of a Soiled Note

In order to facilitate quicker exchange facilities, the definition of soiled note has been expanded. A ‘soiled note’ means a note which has become dirty due to normal wear and tear and also includes a two piece note pasted together wherein both the pieces presented belong to the same note and form the entire note with no essential feature missing. These notes should be accepted over bank counters in payment of Government dues and for credit to accounts of the public maintained with banks. However, in no case, these notes should be issued to the public as re-issuable notes and shall be deposited in currency chests for onward transmission to RBI offices as soiled note remittances for further processing.

4. Mutilated Notes – Presentation and Passing

A mutilated note is a note of which a portion is missing or which is composed of more than two pieces. Mutilated notes may be presented at any of the bank branches. The notes so presented shall be accepted, exchanged and adjudicated in accordance with NRR, 2009.

5. Extremely Brittle, Burnt, Charred, Stuck-Up Notes

Notes which have turned extremely brittle or are badly burnt, charred or inseparably stuck up together and, therefore, cannot withstand normal handling, shall not be accepted by the bank branches for exchange. Instead, the holders may be advised to tender these notes to the Issue Office of Reserve Bank of India concerned where they will be adjudicated under a Special Procedure.

6. Procedure for Exchange of Soiled/ Mutilated/ Imperfect Notes

6.1 Exchange of Soiled Notes

6.1.1 Notes presented in small number: Where the number of notes presented by a person is up to 20 pieces with a maximum value of ₹5,000 per day, banks should exchange them over the counter, free of charge.

6.1.2 Notes presented in bulk: Where the number of notes presented by a person exceeds 20 pieces or ₹5,000 in value per day, banks may accept them, against receipt, for value to be credited later. Banks may levy service charges as permitted in Master Circular on Customer Service in Banks (DBR.No.Leg.BC.21/09.07.006/2015-16 dated July 1, 2015). In case tendered value is above ₹50,000, banks are expected to take the usual precautions.

6.2 Exchange of Mutilated and Imperfect Notes

6.2.1 While designated branches may continue to follow the procedure as laid down in Part III of NRR, 2009 (www.rbi.org.in→Publications→Occassional) for exchanging mutilated and imperfect notes and issue receipt for the notes presented for adjudication, non-chest branches are required to follow the following procedure for notes presented in small numbers and in bulk.

6.2.2 Notes presented in small number: Where the number of notes presented by a person is up to 5 pieces, non-chest branches should normally adjudicate the notes as per the procedure laid down in Part III of NRR, 2009 and pay the exchange value over the counter. If the non-chest branches are not able to adjudicate the mutilated notes, the notes may be received against a receipt and sent to the linked currency chest branch for adjudication. The probable date of payment should be informed to the tenderers on the receipt itself and the same should not exceed 30 days. Bank account details should be obtained from the tenderers for crediting the exchange value by electronic means.

6.2.3 Notes presented in bulk: Where the number of notes presented by a person is more than 5 pieces not exceeding ₹5,000 in value, the tenderer should be advised to send such notes to nearby currency chest branch by insured post giving his / her bank account details (a/c no, branch name, IFSC, etc.) or get them exchanged thereat in person. All other persons tendering mutilated notes whose value exceeds ₹5,000 should be advised to approach nearby currency chest branch. Currency chest branches receiving mutilated notes through insured post should credit the exchange value to the account of sender by electronic means within 30 days of receipt of notes.

6.3 Tenderers aggrieved with the service provided by the banks in this regard may approach Banking Ombudsman concerned, following the procedure as laid under Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006 with the bank/ postal receipts as proof for necessary action.

7. Notes Bearing “PAY” / “PAID” / “REJECT” Stamps

(a) Every Officer-in-charge of the branch i.e. the Branch Manager and every Officer-in-charge of the Accounts or Cash Wing of the Branch shall act as ‘Prescribed Officer’ in each branch to adjudicate the notes received at the branch for exchange in accordance with NRR, 2009. After adjudicating mutilated notes, the Prescribed Officer is required to record his order by subscribing his initials to the dated ‘PAY’/ ‘PAID’/ ‘REJECT’ stamp. The ‘PAY’ /’PAID’ & ‘REJECT’ stamps should also carry the name of the bank and branch concerned and held under the custody of the ‘Prescribed Officer’ to avoid misuse.

(b) Mutilated / defective notes bearing ‘PAY’/’PAID’ (or ‘REJECT’) stamp of any RBI Issue Office or any bank branch, if presented for payment again at any of the bank branches should be rejected under Rule 6(2) of NRR, 2009 and the tenderer should be advised that the value of such note/s cannot be paid since the same has already been paid as is evident from the PAY/ PAID stamps affixed on it/ them. All bank branches have instructions not to issue notes bearing PAY/ PAID stamps to the public even through oversight. The branches should caution their customers not to accept such notes from any bank or anybody else.

8. Notes with Slogans/ Scribbling/ Stain etc.

(a) Notes with slogans, political or religious messages, scribbling, stain (including colour stain) etc. are unfit for usage and circulation and go against Clean Note Policy of RBI.

(b) Such notes received from members of public may not be reissued for circulation. They may be remitted to currency chest for onward remittance to RBI offices.

(c) Any note with slogans and message of a political or religious nature written across it ceases to be a legal tender and the claim on such a note will be rejected under Rule 6(3) (iii) of NRR, 2009. Similarly, notes which are disfigured may also be rejected under Rule 6(3) (ii) of NRR, 2009.

(d) All Bank notes with scribbling / stain (including colour stain) on them continue to be legal tender. Such notes can be deposited or exchanged in any bank branch.

9. Deliberately Cut Notes

The notes, which are found to be deliberately cut, torn, altered or tampered with, if presented for payment of exchange value should be rejected under Rule 6(3) (ii) of the NRR, 2009. Although it is not possible to precisely define deliberately cut notes, a close look at such notes will clearly reveal any deliberate fraudulent intention, as the manner in which such notes are mutilated will follow a broad uniformity in the shape/ location of missing portions of the notes, especially when the notes are tendered in large numbers. The details of the case such as the name of the tenderer, the number of notes tendered and their denominations should be reported thereafter to the DGM/ GM, Issue Department, Reserve Bank of India under whose jurisdiction the branch falls. The matter should also be reported to local police in case a large number of such notes are tendered.

10. Training

RBI Issue Offices conduct training programmes for ‘Prescribed Officers’ of bank branches on a priority basis. As the training programmes are intended to provide knowledge and instil confidence in the Prescribed Officers in the process of adjudication of defective notes, it is imperative that the Prescribed Officers of the branches are deputed for such programmes.

11. Display of Notice Board

All bank branches are required to display at their branch premises, at a prominent place, a board indicating the availability of note and coin exchange facility with the legend, “SOILED/ MUTILATED NOTES AND COINS ARE ACCEPTED AND EXCHANGED HERE” for information of general public. Banks should ensure that all their branches provide facility for exchange of notes and coins not only to their customers but also others. However, they should ensure that the note exchange facility is not cornered by money changers / dealers in defective notes.

12. Disposal of Notes Adjudicated at Bank Branches

Regarding audit of the notes adjudicated by bank branches, the full value paid notes have to be remitted by all branches to the chest branches with which they have been linked and therefrom to the RBI Issue Offices concerned together with the next soiled note remittance in the manner already laid down. The half value paid notes and rejected notes, which are held by the chest branches in their cash balance, may either be remitted separately packed together with the full value paid notes or sent by registered and insured post as and when required. The full value paid notes will be treated as chest remittance by the RBI Issue Office while the half value paid notes and rejected notes will be treated as notes tendered for adjudication and processed accordingly. All chest branches are required to submit to our RBI Issue Offices a monthly statement showing the number of notes adjudicated during the month.

13. Uncurrent Coins

The coins of 25 paise and below, issued from time to time, ceased to be legal tender for payments as well as account with effect from June 30, 2011 in terms of Gazette Notification No. 2529 dated December 20, 2010 issued by the Government of India.

14. Monitoring and Control

(a) The Regional Managers / Zonal Managers of the banks may pay surprise visits to the branches and report the position of compliance in this regard to the Head Office which will review such reports and take prompt remedial action, wherever necessary.

(b) Any non-compliance in this regard shall be viewed as violation of instructions issued by the Reserve Bank of India.


Master Circular – Facility for Exchange of Notes and Coins dated July 01, 2020

List of circulars / notifications consolidated by the Master Circular

Sr.No Circular / Notification No. Date Subject
1. DCM (NE) No.3057/08.07.18/2018-19 26.06.2019 Acceptance of coins
2. DCM (NE) No.657/08.07.18/2018-19 07.09.2018 Amendments to Reserve Bank of India (Note Refund) Rules, 2009
3. RBI/2017-18/132 DCM (RMMT) No.2945/11.37.01/2017-18 15.02.2018 Acceptance of coins
4. DCM(NE)No.120/08.07.18/2016-17 14.07.2016 Facility for Exchange of Soiled/ Mutilated/ Imperfect Notes
5. DCM(NE)No.3498/08.07.18/2012-13 28.01.2013 Facility for exchange of notes and coins
6. DCM (Plg).No.6983/10.03.03/2010-11 28.6.2011 Call in from circulation coins of the denomination of 25 paise and below
7. DCM (Plg).No.6476/10.03.03/2010-11 31.5.2011 Call in from circulation coins of the denomination of 25 paise and below-complaints reading non-acceptance of
8. DCM (Plg).No.4459/10.03.03/2010-11 09.2.2011 Call in from circulation coins of the denomination of 25 paise and below.
9. DCM (Plg).No.4137/10.03.03/2010-11 25.1.2011 Call in from circulation coins of the denomination of 25 paise and below.
10. Gazette of India No.2529 20.12.2010 Notification for withdrawal of 25 paise and below coins
11. DCM(RMMT)No.1277/11.36.03/2010-11 24.8.2010 Exchange Facilities by Currency Chest branches / scheme for providing facilities
12. DCM(NE)No.1612/08.01.01/2009-10 13.9.2009 Notification of Note Refund(Rules), 2009
13. RBI/2006-07/349/DCM (NE)No.7488/08.07.18/2006-07 25.4.2007 Acceptance of Small Denomination Notes and Coins.
14. DCM(RMMT)No.1181/11.37.01/2003-04 05.4.2004 Acceptance of coins.
15. DCM(NE)No.310/08.07.18/2003-04 19.1.2004 Providing facilities to public for exchange of notes, coins, etc.
16. DCM(RMMT)No.404/11.37.01/2003-04 09.10.2003 Acceptance of coins and availability of notes.
17. G-11/08.07.18/2001-02 02.11.2001 Reserve Bank of India (Note Refund) Rules, 1975 – Delegation of note exchange powers to currency chest branches of Public/Private Sector Banks.
18. Cy.No.386/08.07.13/2000-2001 16.11.2000 Reserve Bank of India (Note Refund) Rules, 1975 – Delegation of full note exchange powers to currency chest branches of Public/ Private Sector Banks.
19. G-67/08.07.18/96-97 18.2.1997 RBI (Note Refund) Rules, 1975, Delegation of full powers to private sector banks maintaining currency chests
20. G-52/08.07.18/96-97 11.1.1997 RBI (NR) Rules Scheme of delegation of powers to PSBs for exchange of defective notes – Disposal of notes bearing PAY/PAID stamp.
21. G-24/08.01.01/96-97 03.12.1996 Acceptance of Exchange of Cut Notes – Liberalization.
22. G-64/08.07.18/95-96 18.5.1996 RBI (NR) Rules – Delegation of full powers to branches PSBs and publicity for exchange of defective notes.
23. G-71/08.07.18/92-93 22.6.1993 RBI (NR) Rules – Scheme of delegation of full powers for exchange of defective notes to the branches of PSBs – Publicity.
24. G-83/CL-1(PSB)-91/92 06.5.1992 RBI(NR) Rules – Delegation of powers to chest branches of PSBs.
25. G-74/CL-(PSB)(Gen)-90/91 05.9.1991 RBI(NR) Rules – Delegation of full powers there under to PSBs.
26. 5.5/CL-1(PSB)-90/91 25.9.1990 RBI(NR) Rules – Scheme of delegation of full powers to PSBs.
27. 8/CL-1(PSB)-90/91 17.8.1990 RBI(NR) Rules – Scheme of delegation of full powers to PSBs.
28. G-123/CL-1(PSB)(Gen)-89/90 07.5.1990 RBI (NR) Rules – Scheme of delegation of full powers to PSBs (Amendment).
29. G-108/CL-1(PSB)(Gen)-89/90 03.4.1990 RBI(NR) Rules 1989 – Bank notes of Rs.500/- denomination – Exchange of defective notes at branches of PSBs.
30. G-8/CL-1(PSB)-89/90 12.7.1989 RBI (NR) Rules – Defective notes branded with ‘To Claims’ stamp of RBI Issue Offices.
31. G.84/CL.1(PSB)-88/89 17.3.1989 RBI(NR) Rules – Delegation of full note exchange powers to PSBs.
32. G.66/CL.1(PSB)-88/89 09.2.1989 RBI (NR) Rules – Delegation of powers to PSBs – Training.
33. S.12/CL-1(PSB)-88/89 30.9.1988 RBI (NR) Rules – Deliberately mutilated notes – Adjudication.
34. G.134/CL-1(PSB)-87/89 25.5.1988 Implementation of the Scheme of delegation of full powers under RBI (NR) Rules.
35. 192/CL-1-(PSB)-86/87 02.6.1987 RBI(NR) Rules – Scheme of delegation of full powers to PSBs.
36. 189/CL.2/86/87 02.6.1987 Defacing currency notes by writing on them or inscribing messages, slogans etc. thereon.
37. 185/CL-1(PSB)-86/87 20.5.1987 RBI (NR) Rules – Affixing of ‘PAY’ and ‘REJECT’ stamps on defective notes.
38. 173/CL.1/84/85 02.4.1985 Delegation of full powers to PSBs for exchange of defective notes/procedures of the same.
39. Cy.No.1064/CL.1/76/77 09.8.1976 Facilities to the public for exchange of soiled notes and slightly mutilated notes.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Archegos and how it impacts markets and investors

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


What is Archegos and who is Bill Hwang?

Archegos Capital Management (Archegos) is a US based private family office founded by Bill Hwang. A family office is a private asset management/advisory firm that is set up to manage the private wealth of individuals.

Archegos was originally a hedge fund called Tiger Asia, founded in 2001 by Bill Hwang. He was earlier an employee of Tiger Management (closed in 2000) founded by legendary fund manager and billionaire – Julian Robertson. Post-closing of his hedge fund, Julian Robertson funded/ seeded many hedge funds (including Tiger Asia) founded by his former employees. Many of these have become very successful – the most famous and successful amongst them being tech focussed Hedge Fund, Tiger Global, with AUM of around $50 billion. The many funds founded by former employees of Julian Robertson, came to be known as the ‘Tiger Cubs’, akin to the ‘Paypal Mafia’ that refers to former employees of Paypal who moved on to founding many successful companies like Tesla, Linkedin, Palantir etc.

In 2012, after pleading guilty to wire fraud (insider trading charges), Bill Hwang returned the investors’ money with Tiger Asia back to its investors and converted it into Archegos to exclusively manage his private family money. According to unconfirmed reports, between 2012 till the recent implosion of his fund, he had grown initial wealth of the family office of $200 million, into $10 billion!

What triggered the implosion of Archegos?

It’s the same story again– unravelling of excessive leverage and murky financial instruments – whether it was Long Term Capital Management going bust in 1998 that caused global jitters, Wall Street banks and hedge funds going bust in 2007/08 that caused the great recession or Archegos.

Being a private family office that was trading/investing personal money, Archegos was not subject to higher disclosure requirements that Hedge Funds and Asset Management Companies dealing with public money had to confirm with. Also since it was dealing primarily in instruments such as swaps and contract for differences (cfd) in the direct over the counter (OTC) derivatives segment with Wall Street banks (outside of exchanges), its transactions were behind closed doors. These complex derivative instruments allowed Archegos to make high leveraged bets in many shares by paying only margin money. This way, Archegos profited substantially when the positions moved favourably. Otherwise, it settled with higher margin in case of unfavourable movement. With Archegos dealing with numerous Wall Street banks via these OTC derivatives, no one possibly could have had an exact account of its cumulative leverage or concentrated exposure to few stocks except Archegos itself. According to reports in the public domain, Archegos leverage was as high as 8x to 20 x with some of the banks!

What actually happened on Friday, March 26?

Everything works perfectly till it suddenly stops working. A seemingly great wealth creation success story over 8 years, came to dust in just a week. While the seeds of destruction were sowed in the form of excessive leverage, the trigger for the unravelling was a planned share offering announced on March 22 by media conglomerate ViacomCBS to fund investments in its streaming business. The offering which would have resulted in around 5 per cent dilution was not well received by the markets and the stock started correcting post this announcement. Prior to this announcement ViacomCBS had an unusual run up of around 175 per cent year to date. In hindsight, it appears this was due to outsized long positions amassed via OTC derivatives by Archegos. The correction in ViacomCBS stock triggered margin calls on Archegos positions which could not be met, resulting in forced liquidation of Archegos positions in this and another media conglomerate – Discovery, besides few other tech stocks and Chinese ADRs.

According to reports in the public domain, Wall Street banks had met and discussed if they could try alternatives other than forced liquidation. But soon after the meeting ended, the Wall Street maxim ‘If you need a friend, get a dog’ came to fore. By Friday morning, it was each bank fending for itself. With Archegos’ positions possibly around $50 billion (according to some estimates) with just around $10 billion in capital, Wall Street banks had to resort to game theory and not co-operation to protect their capital. Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank appear to have come out relatively unscathed while Morgan Stanley has had some impact. Credit Suisse and Nomura bore the brunt.

What is the implication of this event for markets?

The fundamental implications of this event are many – transactions with just one client in one geography is expected to wipe off the entire second half year profits of global investment bank Nomura (losses expected around $2 billion). If market sources on loss at Credit Suisse are to be believed, at the higher end of estimates, Archegos driven losses may be close to 2 times Credit Suisse’s entire FY 2020 profits of around $2.85 billion. If banks have been lax with risk management with just one client, a fear arises on whether things are in order with other clients.

Although markets may have brushed of this event under the assumption that this implosion is contained, it is reflective of symptoms of exuberance the markets has been exuding since the covid lows last year. Such lack of caution to factor potential hidden risks in the system may come back to haunt later.

Hence the implications from this event for markets may come in the form of tighter controls in risk management, clampdown in excessive lending and use of murky derivatives. All of these may take away the sheen of recent market exuberance. If corrective steps are not taken now, there may be another event in future that may turn out to be contagious to financial markets and negatively impact asset valuations, including equities.

What is the implication for Indian investors?

India may not face Archegos style events given equity AIFs (Hedge Funds) penetration is relatively low vs market size and we do not have the extensive and complex OTC equity derivatives like in the US. However, one should keep in mind that whenever the US sneezes, the rest of the world including India catches a cold. Whether it was the dotcom boom of 2000 or subprime housing boom of 2007 – both of which were US centric events – India also faced collateral damage when those bubbles burst. Our indices corrected by over 50 per cent from peak, and economic growth was also impacted sharply. Hence, we must always be alert to possibilities of a spill over effect.

Besides that, Indian markets in FY21, received unprecedented FPI investments of over Rs 2.7 lakh crore (most of it in 2H) which is 5 times the highest flows received in last 5 years prior to this . Market buoyancy can be directly attributed to this. Any clampdown on risk taking or increase in margin requirements by foreign brokerages post recent events, may impact these flows and consequently, the markets.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Centre pulls back interest rate cuts on small savings schemes, calling it oversight, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The central government has pulled back the interest rate cu on small saving schemes like public provident fund and national savings certification (NSC) terming it oversight.

The rates on these saving schemes will continue to remain as they were in the January – March quarter.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on twitter said, “”Interest rates of small savings schemes of GoI shall continue to be at the rates which existed in the last quarter of 2020-2021, ie, rates that prevailed as of March 2021. Orders issued by oversight shall be withdrawn.”

PPF and NSC will continue to offer interest of 7.1% and 6.8% for the coming three months.

The government had last cut interest rates a year ago by a sharper 140 basis points for the first quarter of 2020-21.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Hedge fund fallout wipes over $9 bn from market value of Credit Suisse, Nomura, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


LONDON: Shares in Nomura and Credit Suisse fell further on Wednesday, with a collective $9 billion wiped off their market value so far this week as the banks braced for big losses from the blow-up of US-based hedge fund Archegos Capital.

Credit Suisse and Nomura were slower than rivals to cut their exposure to Archegos, a family office run by former Tiger Asia manager Bill Hwang. Global lenders that acted as brokers for Archegos may have to write down more $6 billion after the fund defaulted on payments, Reuters has reported.

Credit Suisse shares fell 4% on Wednesday, bringing this week’s decline to nearly 20%. Already under pressure from its exposure to failed supply chain finance firm Greensill, Credit Suisse’s plans to buy back shares and pay dividends this year could now be at risk, analysts said.

The bank’s market capitalisation has shrunk by five billion Swiss francs since Friday to 25.57 billion Swiss francs ($27.12 billion). Sources estimate Credit Suisse’s losses may total $5 billion but the bank declined to comment.

UBS analysts said “a lot of unanswered questions” remained, referring to Credit Suisse’s involvement first in Greensill and now the US-based hedge fund.

“Outflows? P&L impact? Insurance coverage? Quality of underlying assets? Litigation? Developments around involved partners? Reputational impact? Impact on strategy?” they wrote.

Meanwhile Nomura which has warned of a $2 billion hit from Archegos, fell a further 2.9% following a 0.8% fall on Japanese stock markets on Wednesday. Its market capitalisation has dropped from 2.3 trillion yen ($20.81 billion) to 1.88 trillion yen since Friday, Refinitiv data shows.

Ratings agencies added to the pressure as Moody’s slashed its outlook on Nomura to “negative”, citing potential deficiencies in its risk management process.

Fitch placed Nomura’s viability ratings on “negative watch” citing the potential for material losses arising from transactions with a US client in one of its US subsidiaries as well as questions over the adequacy of Nomura’s controls.

Meanwhile, in derivatives markets the cost of insuring exposure to Credit Suisse and Nomura rose.

Credit Suisse five-year credit defaults swaps (CDS) were trading at 73 basis points, the highest in a year and up 17 bps from Friday’s close, IHS Markit data showed.

That implies a cost of 73,000 Swiss francs a year to insure exposure to 10 million francs worth of Credit Suisse debt for a five-year period.

Nomura CDS were at 52 bps, versus 41 bps on Friday.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Government infuses Rs 14,500 crore capital into four public sector banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: The government has infused Rs 14,500 crore, mainly into banks that are under the RBI’s prompt corrective action framework to improve their financial health.

Indian Overseas Bank, Central Bank of India and UCO Bank are currently under this framework that puts several restrictions on them, including on lending, management compensation and directors’ fees.

Of the total infusion, Rs 11,500 crore has gone to these three banks while the remaining Rs 3,000 crore has been infused into Bank of India.

According to a government notification, Rs 4,800 crore has been provided to Central Bank of India, Rs 4,100 crore to Indian Overseas Bank and Kolkata-based UCO Bank has got Rs 2,600 crore.

The capital infusion will help these banks to come out of the Reserve Bank of India‘s prompt corrective action framework.

The fund infusion has been done through non-interest bearing recapitalisation bonds with maturity varying between March 31, 2031 and March 31, 2036.

The investment in the special securities by public sector banks would not be considered as an eligible investment which is required to made in government securities in pursuance of any statutory provisions or directions applicable to the investing bank, it said.

Most of the large state-owned lenders — including State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank, Union Bank of India, and Indian Bank — have already raised money from various market sources, including share sale on a private placement basis.

For the current financial year, the government had allocated Rs 20,000 crore for capital infusion into the public sector banks for meeting regulatory requirements.

Punjab & Sind Bank was given Rs 5,500 crore in November last year.

Separately, Central Bank of India and Bank of India informed stock exchanges about the fund infusion by the government.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Axis Bank to sell UK arm to tech platform, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Axis Bank informed the bourses that it will be selling its UK subsidiary to OpenPayd Holdings.

The bank’s filing shows the UK arm contributed Rs 206 crore total income in FY20 and a networth of Rs 765 crore as of March 2020 which happens to be almost 1% of the bank’s net worth.

The date for the completion of sale has been set at September 30, 2021 subject to approval from the UK financial regulator and and the prudential regulation authority. The UK subsidiary is being hived off at net asset value and fixed premium of $5.5 million.

OpenPayd Holdings is a tech-led platform bringing together experts from banking, payments and fintech sector to disrupt corproate banking and payments.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 92 93 94 95