Bitcoin tumbles after Turkey bans crypto payments citing risks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


ANKARA: Bitcoin tumbled more than 4 per cent on Friday after Turkey‘s central bank banned the use of cryptocurrencies and crypto assets for purchases citing possible “irreparable” damage and transaction risks.

In legislation published in the Official Gazette, the central bank said cryptocurrencies and other such digital assets based on distributed ledger technology could not be used, directly or indirectly, to pay for goods and services.

The decision could stall Turkey’s crypto market, which has gained momentum in recent months as investors joined the global rally in bitcoin, seeking to hedge against lira depreciation and inflation that topped 16 per cent last month.

Bitcoin was down 4.6 per cent at $60,333 at 1117 GMT after the ban, which was criticised by Turkey’s main opposition party. Smaller coins ethereum and XRP, which tend to move in tandem with bitcoin, fell between 6 per cent-12 per cent.

In a statement, the central bank said crypto assets were “neither subject to any regulation and supervision mechanisms nor a central regulatory authority”, among other security risks.

“Payment service providers will not be able to develop business models in a way that crypto assets are used directly or indirectly in the provision of payment services and electronic money issuance” and will not provide any services, it said.

“Their use in payments may cause non-recoverable losses for the parties to the transactions … and include elements that may undermine the confidence in methods and instruments used currently in payments,” the central bank added.

This week Royal Motors, which distributes Rolls-Royce and Lotus cars in Turkey, became the first business in the country to accept payments in cryptocurrencies.

Cryptocurrencies remain little-used for commerce even as they become increasingly mainstream global assets, although companies including Tesla Inc and travel site Expedia Group Inc do accept such payments.

Tough regulatory clampdowns on cryptocurrencies by major economies have been relatively rare, with most seeking to clarify rules rather than prevent usage. Traders say such bans are hard to enforce, and crypto markets have in the past shrugged off such moves.

Turkey’s main opposition leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu described the decision as another case of “midnight bullying”, referring to President Tayyip Erdogan’s decision last month — announced in a midnight decree — to fire the central bank governor.

“It’s like they have to commit foolishness at night,” he said on Twitter.

The legislation goes into effect on April 30th.

Heavy hand
Crypto trading volumes in Turkey hit 218 billion lira ($27 billion) from early February to 24 March, up from just over 7 billion lira in the same period a year earlier, according to data from U.S. researcher Chainalysis analysed by Reuters.

Trading spiked in the days after Erdogan replaced the bank governor, sending the lira down as much as 15 per cent.

Last week, Turkish authorities demanded user information from crypto trading platforms.

“Any authority which starts regulating (the market) with a ban will end up frustrated (since this) encourages fintech startups to move abroad,” said economist Ugur Gurses.

In what would be one of the world’s strictest policies, India will propose a ban on cryptocurrencies and fines on those trading or holding the assets. China banned such trading in 2017, slamming the brakes on a free-wheeling emerging crypto industry.

“Headlines like this at this point tend to send a bolt across the bows,” said Joseph Edwards, head of research at crypto brokerage Enigma Securities in London, while noting that similar regulatory moves in Nigeria and India “didn’t even move the needle”.

Ahmed Faruk Karsli, CEO of Turkish payment systems firm Papara, said the ban on transferring money to cryptocurrency platforms via fintech systems was unexpected.

“It is much easier to choose to ban than to make an effort to deal with this financial technology,” he told Ekoturk TV.

“This is a regulation that makes me concerned for my country.”

($1 = 8.0800 liras)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

MFIN CEO, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The microfinance sector is unlikely to face major challenges from the second wave of COVID-19 and is well prepared to face any disruption, Microfinance Institutions Network (MFIN) CEO Alok Misra said.

Over the past year, microfinance institutions (MFIs) have streamlined their processes, trained field staff on COVID-appropriate behaviour and in dealing with lockdowns, and focussed on digitisation, and these steps will help them in managing any kind of situation, he added.

“In the last one year, training, involvement of senior-level people at the ground level and digital content have ensured that the (MFI) sector is far better prepared (now) than when it (COVID-19) hit us last year,” Misra noted.

Till the time the pandemic continues, there will be local level lockdowns that would create medium to minor level disruptions to livelihoods, but the industry has learned to live with it, he said.

“I can’t say that it would be normal to pre-COVID days. Some impact would be there, but it would be minimal, which will not be debilitating on the industry,” Misra added.

MFIN is an RBI-recognized self-regulatory organisation (SRO) for the microfinance industry. It has 58 NBFC-MFIs and 39 associates, including banks, small finance banks (SFBs) and NBFCs as its members.

Misra said the MFI industry is adopting innovative methods to reach out to their clients, keep the connect going on and survive.

Rating agency Icra Ratings in a recent report said the overall long-term growth outlook for the domestic microfinance industry, including microfinance institutions (MFI) and micro finance-focused small finance banks (SFB)s, remains robust, even though the near-term outlook is clouded given the COVID-19 induced disruptions.

It, however, said the asset quality pressures for the MFI industry will continue in the near term and the same may get accentuated with the recent increase in COVID-19 infections and localised restrictions/lockdowns.

“Nevertheless, improving collection efficiency, good on-balance sheet liquidity and capitalisation should help most entities to withstand the stress,” the agency added.

MFIN releases performance numbers of MFIs every quarter. The fourth-quarter numbers are yet to be declared.

Misra said during the third quarter of FY21, the sector disbursed around Rs 60,000 crore, similar to the corresponding quarter of FY20.

“If I extrapolate that (Q3 FY21 trend) then the disbursement pattern in January-March, when the COVID-19 situation was better than Q3, would have been normal,” he said.

The collection efficiency of MFIs in the fourth quarter stood at close to 92 per cent, he added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Average deal sizes have been going up for last 3-4 years, says Kotak Investment Banking CEO, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


FY21 saw 120 deals on the ECM side, raising more than Rs 2,20,000 crore compared with FY20 that had 65 deals raising about Rs 1,40,000 crore, says S Ramesh, MD & CEO, Kotak Investment Banking.

How special was FY21 in your view and how are things geared for the next couple of months in FY22?
I would say FY20 and FY21 were exemplary years for the investment banking industry. FY21 was a notch higher and was a great year for the industry. Just to put some statistics around this, FY21 saw 120 deals on the ECM side, raising more than Rs 2,20,000 crore compared with FY20 that had 65 deals raising about Rs 1,40,000 crore. Similarly, the advisory and M&M side deals announced in FY21 were close to $120 billion compared with about $90 billion in FY20.

The components of the ECM business were IPOs and QIPs and we also saw during the last two years, the largest right issue came in from RIL and on the M&M and advisory side, the financial sponsors, private equity and the tech dominated in terms of doing deals. Overall, for the investment banking industry and for us, it has been a very busy time.

How do you expect FY22 to be?
We expect FY22 to continue on similar lines. There is a little bit of pause and fatigue in the equity capital market (ECM) given the volumes of deals and the bad news around Covid, but the pipeline is quite strong.

The composition of money is changing. Historically, US-based North American funds have been dominant in India but this time capital flow is coming from newer geographies. Give us some flavour of the kind of money which is coming in.
If I were to look at money flow in the context of the ECM deals, for some time now Asia and India have been dominant but let me give some new perspectives. There are a bunch of investors, particularly the sovereign wealth funds, who have been present in the secondary markets but who were not so active in IPOs. We are now seeing a change in that trend. In some of the recent IPOs, we saw sovereign wealth funds come in and invest a reasonable amount of money. We expect this pattern to continue. Similarly, emerging funds out of Europe have preferred participating in large caps and in the secondary markets. They have moved the bar a little bit to participate in midcap IPOs. We are seeing the trends continue.

We are also seeing very active involvement from hedge funds which are opening their long only books to remain invested in some of the IPOs. In our conversations with clients — both private equity investors and corporates — we find that there is reasonable optimism about deal making. There is also optimism that Indian markets have a great architecture to allow them listing or do M&A deals.

There is also an optimism that the flow of money will continue. Except for these odd windows when we may have abatement both on advisory and payment & cash management (PCM) — we continue to see a fair bit of optimism among both investors and clients.

What kind of enquires are in the pipeline? We understand that Nykaa, Zomato and policybazaar IPOs are in the offing. Some of the big new tech companies are showing interest about coming to D-Street.
I will not give you the names but I will give you an idea what kind of pipeline we are seeing. I think 2022 and 2023 are likely to be dominated on the equity capital market side by new listings on the tax base. The new age companies’ pipeline is quite active. There is also good interest from investors to invest in these companies. We have already seen some announcements of pre-IPOs and we expect the new age tech company IPOs to be very active.

The second space is specialty chemicals and allied space. Some very interesting and large names which have remained unlisted over the last many decades are now finding it worthwhile to consider listing. The healthcare sector continues to see inquiries and so we will see listings of healthcare and occasionally large auto ancillary companies. Last but not the least, the financial services space will see IPOs.

Quite a few names are likely to get listed over the next 12 to 18 months and this will give us an idea of the flavour of the sector. In the last one to two years, we saw real estate or financial services dominating the IPO space. We are now seeing more diversification. Newer sectors like specialty chemicals, agri chemicals and some very interesting companies in the consumer space are making it quite interesting for investors to engage. Our conversations with clients and investors show that there will be reasonable interest to partake in some of these offerings. On the QIP front, there was a lot of fundraising that happened front ended in FY20 and a little bit in FY21.While there will be some action in FY22, a lot more may happen in FY23.

Are the average deal sizes also going up? Is there more risk appetite among the investor community for some of these newer assets?
When we talk to investors and clients, we find there is a profound recognition that the sustainable way to build wealth is through a proper listing on the stock market and continuing to nurture it. There is one trend line that we have seen every year over the last three-four years. The average deal sizes have kept moving up and investors generally like large companies where they have the ability to participate. The impact cost is less and if these companies do well, they will have the ability to get into various indices over time.

We are noticing conversations. Companies are now looking at much larger floors than they were before. The average deal size has moved to Rs 1,000 crore but I will not be surprised if over the next one to two years, this needle will move a notch up to maybe Rs 1,500 crore. There are other deal sizes which are larger.

In the last two years, SBI Cards IPO was the largest in the private sector at close to Rs 10,000 crore. This year, Rs 6,479.55-crore Gland Pharma IPO took place. We were involved in both these deals. Larger deal sizes are preferred by investors. In some of these new age tech companies, we are seeing similar conversations where the deal sizes and the floors are likely to be large.

A quick word on where are we on the cycle as far as the stock market is concerned? Do you see any upside in 12-24 months as far as the earnings are concerned?
I will break it up into two parts. I think we are currently all in this second wave that has hit India in particular and other parts of the world. So, the move is a little muted but there is more optimism because there was a turnaround and a lot of companies were doing well. Some of the industries and sectors found their way through this muddle.

Currently, you will have to give a little time for companies to spend off the temporary lockdowns and come back. In general, I will make two points. Both on the corporate and the economy side there is more optimism that India in particular, over the next few years will do well. The second thing is that given this backdrop and given that governments all over the world are loosening their purse strings, we expect the flow to be quite good for India.

The emerging markets in particular are likely to benefit but India will get a reasonably good proportion of these funds. We think that liquidity will not be a challenge but there will be pockets where you have to be careful. Otherwise, the trend line is quite positive when we look at the next two or three years.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI puts up for sale NPA account MSP Metallics, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


SBI has put up for sale non-performing asset (NPA) account MSP Metallics Ltd against which a total of 10 banks have collective loan outstanding of over Rs 1,493 crore. State Bank of India (SBI) has the highest share of lending (37.19 per cent) to MSP Metallics amounting to Rs 555.51 crore.

The other lenders to the company as part of the consortium arrangement are — Indian Bank (Rs 284.82 crore); Punjab National Bank (Rs 229.83 crore); UCO Bank (Rs 176.53 crore); Indian Overseas Bank (Rs 73.56 crore); Canara Bank (Rs 62.66 crore); Central Bank of India (Rs 41.91 crore); Union Bank of India (Rs 38.06 crore); Bank of Baroda (Rs 28.02 crore) and Bank of India (Rs 2.84 crore).

The total outstanding against all the 10 lenders stands at Rs 1,493.74 crore. The reserve price has been set at Rs 350 crore.

“In terms of the bank’s policy on sale of financial assets, in line with the regulatory guidelines, we place the…accounts for sale to ARCs/ Banks/ NBFCs/ FIs, on the terms and conditions indicated there against,” SBI said in a sale notice on its website.

The e-auction for MSP Metallics account is to take place on May 4, 2021.

SBI said the sale will be subject to final approval of the other banks who are part of the consortium lending.

“The interested ARCs/banks/NBFCs/FIs can conduct due diligence of these assets with immediate effect, after submitting expression of interest and executing a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with the bank,” SBI said.

The sale is on ‘as is where is basis’.

MSP Metallics runs an integrated steel plant at Marakuta, Jharsuguda district in Odisha.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ESAF SFB mops up Rs 162 crore via pref allotment of shares

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


According to the unaudited results, the bank has achieved a year-on-year (y-o-y) growth of 25.86% in gross business during FY21.

ESAF Small Finance Bank on Friday said it has raised Rs 162 crore through preferential allotment of shares. A total of 2.18 crore shares were allotted to certain investors in the HNI category, including some existing investors, leading to a dilution of approximately 5%, at Rs 75 per share.

The shares were priced at 2.64 times pre-issue and 2.45 times post-issue of its book value as of September 30, 2020, sources at ESAF said.

“The additional capital raised will strengthen the capital adequacy by about 250 basis points and will support our ambitious growth plan set for FY22. The overwhelming response shown by our investors during these tough times gives us the confidence to aim big. Considering the comfortable capital position and subdued market outlook on BFSI stocks, we had decided to postpone the IPO scheduled for the last financial year,” said K Paul Thomas, MD & CEO. The bank has reported a stupendous growth during these challenging times, he added.

According to the unaudited results, the bank has achieved a year-on-year (y-o-y) growth of 25.86% in gross business during FY21. It has reported a 28.04% y-o-y rise in total deposits to Rs 9,000 crore and advances crossed Rs 8,413 crore at a growth of 23.61% as on March 31, 2021. Total business crossed Rs 17,412 crore, against Rs 13,835 crore in the year-ago period. “The results show our commitment to our stakeholders. We are also thankful for the resilience shown by our customers” Thomas said. He added that the CASA growth was impressive at 82%, thanks to the focused strategies adopted by the bank.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SC issues guidelines for cheque bounce cases, asks govt to amend laws

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Of the 2.31 crore pending criminal cases, 35.16 lakh relate to dishonoured cheques. The reason for the backlog of cases, according to amici curiae, is that while there is a steady increase in complaints every year, the rate of disposal does not match the rate of institution of complaints.

To ensure speedy disposal of more than 35 lakh cheque bounce cases pending in various courts, the Supreme Court on Friday gave a number of directions, including asking the government to amend the laws to allow clubbing of multiple trials in cases filed for a same transaction against anyone.

To avoid multiplicity of proceedings and to reduce the burden on the docket of the criminal courts, a five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice S A Bobde recommended that “suitable amendments” be made in the Negotiable Instruments Act for provision of one trial against a person for multiple offences under Section 138 committed within a period of 12 months.

Of the 2.31 crore pending criminal cases, 35.16 lakh relate to dishonoured cheques. The reason for the backlog of cases, according to amici curiae, is that while there is a steady increase in complaints every year, the rate of disposal does not match the rate of institution of complaints.

The SC said that over the years, courts have been inundated with cheque bounce complaints which could not be decided within a reasonable period and “this gargantuan pendency of complaints … has had an adverse effect in disposal of other criminal cases.”

Stating that undue delay in service of summons is the main cause for the disproportionate accumulation of complaints under Section 138 before the courts, the judges requested the high courts to issue practice directions to the trial courts to treat service of summons in one complaint pertaining to a transaction as deemed service for all complaints filed before the same court relating to dishonour of cheques issued as part of the transaction.

It directed that the HCs may issue practice directions to the magistrates to record cogent and sufficient reasons before converting summary trial to summons trial in exercise of power under the second proviso to Section 143 of the Act. Even the examination of witnesses should be permitted on affidavit and only in exceptional cases, the magistrate may examine the witnesses personally, it said.

On March 5 last year, the top court had registered a suo motu case and decided to evolve a concerted and coordinated mechanism for speedy disposal of such cases. It had appointed senior advocate Siddharth Luthra and advocate K Parameshwar as amici curiae.

The SC had sought the Centre’s view on creating additional courts to deal with cheque bounce cases. However, the Centre, through the Department of Financial Services (DFS), had dismissed the suggestion. Instead of setting up additional special courts, the DFS had suggested measures like capping the maximum number of hearings.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Speeches

[ad_1]

Read More/Less




April 14, 2015




Dear All




Welcome to the refurbished site of the Reserve Bank of India.





The two most important features of the site are: One, in addition to the default site, the refurbished site also has all the information bifurcated functionwise; two, a much improved search – well, at least we think so but you be the judge.




With this makeover, we also take a small step into social media. We will now use Twitter (albeit one way) to send out alerts on the announcements we make and YouTube to place in public domain our press conferences, interviews of our top management, events, such as, town halls and of course, some films aimed at consumer literacy.




The site can be accessed through most browsers and devices; it also meets accessibility standards.



Please save the url of the refurbished site in your favourites as we will give up the existing site shortly and register or re-register yourselves for receiving RSS feeds for uninterrupted alerts from the Reserve Bank.



Do feel free to give us your feedback by clicking on the feedback button on the right hand corner of the refurbished site.



Thank you for your continued support.




Department of Communication

Reserve Bank of India


Next

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How the RBI forced bond market to tango

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


 

The ‘bond vigilantes’ who were warned by the RBI to stop demanding high yields in bond auctions do not seem to be in any mood to listen. The central bank is clearly livid, and this is apparent in the action that unfolded in the bond market on Friday.

Yields rise

The yield on 10-year bonds, which had moved lower to 6.01 per cent after the central bank unveiled the G-SAP 1.0 programme, spiked above 6.12 per cent after the first G-SAP auction on Thursday. The market was apparently not happy with the quantum of purchase in the 10-year bucket.

The bond market was on the edge through Friday, with 10-year yields trading at around 6.16 per cent, ahead of the weekly auction amounting to ₹26,000 crore in which 10-year securities accounted for ₹14,000 crore.

The auction results reveal that the RBI has not purchased any 10-year paper, though bids worth ₹28,000 crore were received for these securities. Ten-year bond yields plunged sharply after 3 pm, when auction results were announced, and are now trading at 6.08 per cent again. The RBI intended to offer bonds worth ₹25,000 crore in the first G-SAP auction. The response to the auction was robust, with offers worth ₹1,01,671 crore received.

The RBI accepted the entire ₹25,000 crore that it originally offered to purchase. The problem in the G-SAP auction, according to market sources, was that the ₹25,000 crore notified by the RBI was spread across maturities (see table). The amount intended for the 10-year bonds was only ₹7,500 crore. The bond market wanted higher purchases in this maturity because the government tends to borrow mainly in this bracket.

For instance, in the weekly auction scheduled for April 16, more than 50 per cent was ear-marked for 10-year securities. The level of nervousness among underwriters was obvious in the commission auctioned for 10-year bonds shooting up to 47.17 paisa on Friday.

 

Other reasons

The other reason why 10-year yields moved higher is because the cut-off yield for 6-year bonds bought in the G-SAP auction was 6.13 per cent.

While the RBI is trying to cool the yield in the 10-year bonds, the yields on 6, 7, 8 and 9 year bonds are higher than the 10-year, implying that the market does want the bond prices to trade lower across maturities, given the large supply scheduled to flood the market. The WPI inflation number released yesterday was yet another dampener for bonds.

“The expected trajectory of the WPI inflation, and its partial transmission into the CPI inflation, going ahead, supports our view that there is negligible space for rate cuts to support growth, in spite of the growing uncertainty related to the surge in Covid-19 cases, localised restrictions and emerging concerns regarding migrants returning to the hinterland. This is likely to keep a floor under the G-Sec yields,” says Aditi Nayar, Chief Economist, ICRA.

It’s clear that market forces dictate that 10-year yields have to move higher from here. It has to be seen how long the RBI can keep yields in check with these strong arm tactics and threats of ‘tandav’.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Open banking may potentially pose significant risks: RBI Dy Guv Rao

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Open banking may potentially pose significant risks and concerns around financial privacy and data security, customer liability, cybersecurity and operational risks, among others, cautioned Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Deputy Governor M Rajeshwar Rao.

Open banking is the sharing and leveraging of customer-permissioned data by banks with third-party developers and firms to build applications and services, including those that provide real-time payments, greater financial transparency options for account holders, marketing and cross-selling opportunities.

In open banking, there can be wide-ranging third-party arrangements such as fintech firms, intermediary firms engaged in data aggregation and other service providers which may not have a contractual agreement with the bank over which regulators can exercise jurisdiction, Rao said in a webinar on Open Banking organised by Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) in association with the Embassy of India in Brazil

Further, it may be possible that several of these firms may not fall under the regulatory purview of any financial sector regulator. In such situations, it may become difficult for regulators to set requirements, specifications, and exercise regulatory jurisprudence, he added.

Loss/theft of personal data

“In open banking frameworks, risks associated with the loss or theft of personal data on account of poor security, data protection violations, money laundering, and terrorist financing concerns cannot be ruled out.

“Therefore, large scale adoption of open banking frameworks should ideally be preceded by strong data protection and privacy laws,”the Deputy Governor said.

Rao emphasised that such laws should anchor the ownership rights and ensure control and consent-based use of the data. They should also establish the boundaries of rights and obligations of third-party use, down-streaming data to fourth parties and reselling it.

“India has already embarked upon the same and The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 has already been introduced. The Bill seeks to provide for the protection of personal data of individuals and establishes a Data Protection Authority for the same,” the Deputy Governor said.

Redressal of grievances

Rao noted that in the absence of explicit arrangements for redressal of customer grievances and limiting their liability in case of erroneous or fraudulent activity, the acceptability of open banking frameworks may remain limited.

Therefore, the jurisdictions should address customer liability for third party access of data through customer protection or indemnity laws.

In this regard, Rao underscored that RBI had issued Charter of Customer Rights in December 2014, which lists ‘right to privacy’ along with ‘right to grievance redress and compensation’ among others.

Increase in surface area for cyber frauds

Rao cautioned that open banking architectures, which are premised on the enhanced sharing of data, increase the surface area for cyber frauds.

As the open API (Application Programming Interface) provides uncluttered access to customer banking data such as transactions and balance stored within the infrastructure, it may also pose a severe cybersecurity risk, he added.

“Losses caused to customers on account of cyber events would require financial institutions to compensate customers for such losses.

“Institutions may also face a variety of potential operational and cyber security issues related to the use of APIs, including data breaches, misuse, falsification, denial of service attacks and infrastructure malfunction,” the Deputy Governor said.

Difficult to assign liability

Rao remarked that with more parties and intermediaries involved in providing financial services in an open banking model, it is more difficult to assign liability. Suppose the regulations governing customer grievance redressals are not updated to consider available banking business models. In that case, the national authorities may find it challenging to provide the customers with adequate levels of protection.

In India, RBI implemented a separate Ombudsman Scheme for Digital Transactions in January 2019. The number of complaints received under the Ombudsman Scheme for Digital Transactions (OSDT) has been consistently increasing reflecting increased digital modes of banking, he said.

Potential disruptor

“Open banking is a potential disruptor in the financial system and may change the way of doing banking for both- customers and banks.

“New pure tech-play entities have the potential to snatch market share from established but traditional financial institutions because they are technologically more advanced, digitally agile to cater to customer needs with higher efficiency, have better user interface, and are more competitive in pricing,” the Deputy Governor said.

At the same time, all stakeholders need to appreciate that while technological innovation is of paramount importance, customer privacy and data protection are non-negotiable, he added.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

LIC’s death claims rose 17% in first 9 months of FY21

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Death claims made on state-run Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) crossed the 8-lakh mark between April and December 2020, reversing the decline in their numbers over the previous three years.

As many as 8,16,652 death claims were made on LIC in April-December 2020, up 17.11 per cent from the 6,97,314 claims in the corresponding period of 2019. It was not specified how many of these death claims related to Covid-19. In the nine months of 2020-21, LIC settled 8,08,575 death claims and paid ₹16,945.96 crore. The data indicate that the number of death claims made rose sharply in the October-December period. Between April and June, as many as 1,68,301 death claims were made and they increased to 4,50,849 in the six months between April and September 2020. Insurers have pointed out that the nationwide lockdown in the first quarter of last year had delayed filing of claims.

The surge in death claims in 2020 came after a decline in the previous years from 2017. The death claims made on LIC dropped from 7,57,463 in April-December 2017 to 7,15,389 in the same period of 2018.

The data must be seen in the context of the fact that though India was among countries earliest to report Covid, its death rate due to the infection has not been very high.

Claims up for private insurers

According to a Motilal Oswal report in March, SBI Life Insurance registered about 5,000 Covid-related claims and paid out about ₹340 crore. “A similar rise in death claims was seen in other insurers as well,” the report said.

ICICI Prudential Life Insurance also settled claims of about ₹340 crore. HDFC Life paid off Covid-related claims of 1,271 individuals and 542 group settlements. Death claims were the highest at 10,525 as against 7,313 for Max Life Insurance in the third quarter of 2019-20, it said. In recent weeks with the surge in Covid infections, non-life insurers, too, have been reporting a rise in claims.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 41 42 43 44 45 95