‘We will expand pan-India digitally’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


We will also have more opportunities to lend at a lower rate in terms of government-sponsored schemes and availability of refinance.

Shivalik Small Finance Bank (SFB), the first lender to transition to the model from a cooperative bank, expects to grow its business book by about 49% over the next 12 months to Rs 3,050 crore, MD & CEO Suveer Kumar Gupta told Shritama Bose. The bank’s collections have so far been unaffected by the Covid surge, but it will watch how things evolve from here, he added. Edited excerpts:

As you make the transition from an urban cooperative bank to an SFB, what are your immediate priorities?

We have already begun operations as an SFB. Our immediate priorities relate to certain aspects of banking that are different for a cooperative bank and a commercial bank, foremost among them being compliances. Our first priority is to stabilise them. As far as the customer-facing aspects are concerned, there’s not much of a change from how we delivered services as a cooperative bank. We have ensured that all our operations are handled seamlessly and the customer does not face any issues because of this transition. The second focus is on the digital side. We are a very digitally focused bank and we plan to acquire digital-only customers. This is especially for millennials and young people who are more comfortable doing things digitally. We are also developing tech, which will help us deliver services to the underbanked, especially in rural areas. We are coming up with an app designed with the rural masses in mind, which will be in Hindi. Physically, we would like to expand in areas where our presence is already high — in the states of Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Haryana, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. We would also like to expand pan-India digitally by means of video KYC.

Will you be adding more products to your platform?

As of now, we offer a complete bouquet of retail banking products, both on the deposit side as well as the lending side. Our products are specially suited to our target customer base, which is the MSME (micro, small and medium enterprises) sector — small businesses and industries as well as local kirana shops. Becoming an SFB opens up more areas of banking to us. On the deposits side, we would be coming up with tax-saver FDs (fixed deposits) for senior citizens, and specialised deposits for millennials and women. We would be soliciting government and institutional business for deposits. On the lending side, apart from offering all our loan products digitally, we would expand on the agri side and do lending against e-warehouse receipts and also finance allied activities, such as dairy farming. As a commercial bank, we can also make use of refinance schemes. Our microfinance book is now at 10%, which we would like to grow to 15-20%. We’d also like to offer loans against FDs and insurance policies, both of which can be done digitally. We already have a few fintech partnerships for loan sourcing and we will be looking for more of those as well as work with business correspondents.

What is your cost of funds right now and how do you expect it to change?

At the moment our cost of funds is between 6 and 6.5% and we expect it to fall as more CASA (current account savings account) becomes available to the bank in terms of government and institutional deposits. We will also have more opportunities to lend at a lower rate in terms of government-sponsored schemes and availability of refinance.

What kind of growth in loans do you expect over a one-year period?

We are currently at a business book size of about Rs 2,050 crore and we are targeting to grow it to Rs 6,000 crore in the next four years. In the next one year, the book will grow by Rs 1,000 crore. We are planning to add 40 additional customer touch points, which will include branches, ATMs and business correspondents.

Given the current Covid surge, how much of a problem are you facing in terms of repayments?

Last year, we had offered the moratorium to all our customers. Our approach was to engage with customers and help ensure good credit behaviour. Where required, we also offered top-up loans to help them tide through temporary difficulties. By the time it got lifted, 80% of our customers had started to repay. By March, our collections were almost back to pre-Covid levels. But the second wave has hit us in April and it’s a little early now to say how things will turn out. At the moment our collection rates are fine, but it’s hard to say where things will go from here.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBL, DCB and Federal Bank may hunt for new CEOs, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


It’s not just Kotak Mahindra Bank that has to do succession planning after the RBI capped the tenure of private bank CEOs at 15 years.

DCB Bank, RBL Bank and Federal Bank will have to look for new CEOs after the term of current ones ends in the next three years.

DCB Bank CEO Murali Natrajan has completed 12 years in the job and got a year’s extension this month.

Federal Bank CEO Shyam Srinivasan will complete 11 years in September when his second consecutive one-year extension ends.

RBL’s Vishwavir Ahuja also completes 11 years in June and is awaiting the RBI nod for another three-year term after the bank’s board approved such a proposal in January. Federal Bank and RBL boards have sought three-year terms for their CEOs. It remains to be seen whether the RBI will give this extension, which is within the 15-year limit.

Why the move?

The regulator’s directions on limiting CEO tenures come after the publication last summer of a discussion paper that had sought a review of the governance framework at commercial banks. A bank CEO who is also a promoter or major shareholder cannot hold these posts for more than 12 years, the revised RBI rules said.

Experts say governance lapses at Yes Bank also prompted the move by the central bank.

The new norms do not apply to bank CEOs whose tenures have already been approved by RBI.

“Banks with MDs & CEOs or whole-time directors (WTD) who have already completed 12 or 15 years as MD & CEO or WTD, on the date these instructions come into effect, shall be allowed to complete their current term as already approved by the Reserve Bank.”The banking regulator said

The impact

Bankers said the central bank’s move could hurt stability at small and medium private sector banks that require strong leadership and an understanding of the business to stand out in a competitive lending business. In a related move, the RBI has directed that half the directors in banks be independent ones. It has also put an annual Rs 20-lakh ceiling on fees to be paid to independent directors. It also said that independent directors have to chair bank boards.

Subscribe to ETBFSI Daily Newsletter and stay updated.
https://bfsi.economictimes.indiatimes.com/etnewsletter.php



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less



(Amount in ₹ crore, Rate in Per cent)

  Volume
(One Leg)
Weighted
Average Rate
Range
A. Overnight Segment (I+II+III+IV) 438,572.91 3.21 0.01-3.50
     I. Call Money 10,778.18 3.20 1.90-3.50
     II. Triparty Repo 316,336.30 3.23 3.00-3.25
     III. Market Repo 109,731.43 3.14 0.01-3.40
     IV. Repo in Corporate Bond 1,727.00 3.40 3.38-3.40
B. Term Segment      
     I. Notice Money** 404.10 3.16 2.40-3.40
     II. Term Money@@ 273.00 3.00-3.40
     III. Triparty Repo 238.10 3.20 3.20-3.20
     IV. Market Repo 1,030.00 3.28 0.01-3.38
     V. Repo in Corporate Bond 1,547.00 3.43 3.43-3.43
  Auction Date Tenor (Days) Maturity Date Amount Current Rate /
Cut off Rate
C. Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF) & Marginal Standing Facility (MSF)
I. Today’s Operations
1. Fixed Rate          
     (i) Repo          
     (ii) Reverse Repo Tue, 27/04/2021 1 Wed, 28/04/2021 422,887.00 3.35
2. Variable Rate&          
  (I) Main Operation          
     (a) Reverse Repo          
  (II) Fine Tuning Operations          
     (a) Repo          
     (b) Reverse Repo
3. MSF Tue, 27/04/2021 1 Wed, 28/04/2021 12.00 4.25
4. Long-Term Repo Operations    
5. Targeted Long Term Repo Operations
6. Targeted Long Term Repo Operations 2.0
7. Net liquidity injected from today’s operations
[injection (+)/absorption (-)]*
      -422,875.00  
II. Outstanding Operations
1. Fixed Rate          
     (i) Repo          
     (ii) Reverse Repo          
2. Variable Rate&          
  (I) Main Operation          
     (a) Reverse Repo Fri, 23/04/2021 14 Fri, 07/05/2021 200,017.00 3.47
  (II) Fine Tuning Operations          
     (a) Repo          
     (b) Reverse Repo          
3. MSF          
4. Long-Term Repo Operations# Mon, 17/02/2020 1095 Thu, 16/02/2023 499.00 5.15
  Mon, 02/03/2020 1094 Wed, 01/03/2023 253.00 5.15
  Mon, 09/03/2020 1093 Tue, 07/03/2023 484.00 5.15
  Wed, 18/03/2020 1094 Fri, 17/03/2023 294.00 5.15
5. Targeted Long Term Repo Operations^ Fri, 27/03/2020 1092 Fri, 24/03/2023 12,236.00 4.40
  Fri, 03/04/2020 1095 Mon, 03/04/2023 16,925.00 4.40
  Thu, 09/04/2020 1093 Fri, 07/04/2023 18,042.00 4.40
  Fri, 17/04/2020 1091 Thu, 13/04/2023 20,399.00 4.40
6. Targeted Long Term Repo Operations 2.0^ Thu, 23/04/2020 1093 Fri, 21/04/2023 7,950.00 4.40
7. On Tap Targeted Long Term Repo Operations Mon, 22/03/2021 1095 Thu, 21/03/2024 5,000.00 4.00
D. Standing Liquidity Facility (SLF) Availed from RBI$       27,202.06  
E. Net liquidity injected from outstanding operations [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*     -90,732.94  
F. Net liquidity injected (outstanding including today’s operations) [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*     -513,607.94  
G. Cash Reserves Position of Scheduled Commercial Banks
     (i) Cash balances with RBI as on 27/04/2021 516,863.65  
     (ii) Average daily cash reserve requirement for the fortnight ending 07/05/2021 538,082.00  
H. Government of India Surplus Cash Balance Reckoned for Auction as on¥ 27/04/2021 0.00  
I. Net durable liquidity [surplus (+)/deficit (-)] as on 09/04/2021 712,322.00  
@ Based on Reserve Bank of India (RBI) / Clearing Corporation of India Limited (CCIL).
– Not Applicable / No Transaction.
** Relates to uncollateralized transactions of 2 to 14 days tenor.
@@ Relates to uncollateralized transactions of 15 days to one year tenor.
$ Includes refinance facilities extended by RBI.
& As per the Press Release No. 2019-2020/1900 dated February 06, 2020.
* Net liquidity is calculated as Repo+MSF+SLF-Reverse Repo.
# As per the Press Release No. 2020-2021/287 dated September 04, 2020.
^ As per the Press Release No. 2020-2021/605 dated November 06, 2020.
As per the Press Release No. 2020-2021/520 dated October 21, 2020, Press Release No. 2020-2021/763 dated December 11, 2020 and Press Release No. 2020-2021/1057 dated February 05, 2021.
¥ As per the Press Release No. 2014-2015/1971 dated March 19, 2015.
Rupambara
Director   
Press Release : 2021-2022/121

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Monitor ARCs for ‘circuitous movement of funds’ with banks, says RBI paper, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India has flagged risks of excessive reliance on banks by the ARC industry.

An RBI paper, published in the central bank’s monthly bulletin for April, said banks supply non performing assets (NPAs) to the ARCs, hold shareholding in these entities and also lend to them, which makes it necessary to monitor if there is a “circuitous movement of funds between banks and these institutions (ARCs)”.

“Considering that banks are not just the major shareholders of and lenders to ARCs but also sellers of NPAs to ARCs, it may be necessary to monitor if there is a circuitous movement of funds between banks and these institutions. A movement of this kind can have implications for the genuine sale of NPAs and the overall growth of the ARC industry,” the article titled ‘ARCs in India: A Study of their Business Operations and Role in NPA Resolution’ said.

ARC versus IBC

It advocated for a strong a strong asset reconstruction sector, which complements the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code mechanism, to better deal with non-performing assets and ensure higher recovery and resolution. Asset reconstruction companies recovered 29.7% of dues in 2019-20, while for IBC, this number was much higher at 45.5%, it said. Highlighting that there has been a declining trend in recovery over the years, the article said that even post IBC, their recovery amounts to 25-35% of dues, and they also account for 30% of total amount recovered through all channels.

Bad bank

The RBI article sees a greater role for asset reconstruction companies, including the bad bank announced in the budget.

“Going forward, the introduction of a new asset reconstruction company for addressing the NPAs of public sector banks may also shape the operations of the existing ARCs,” the RBI paper said. It added that there is a definite scope for the entry of a “well-capitalised and well-designed entity” in the Indian ARC industry and such a body will strengthen the asset resolution mechanism further.

It cited global experiences to lay down the necessary features of the new ARC announced by the government.

The paper advocated that the new ARC or the bad bank should have a narrow mandate such as resolving NPAs with clearly defined goals, a sunset clause defining their lifespan, supportive legal infrastructure involving bankruptcy and private property laws, backing of a strong political will to recognise problem loans, and a commercial focus including in governance, transparency, and disclosure requirements.

Capital constraints

The paper highlights the capital constraints of the ARC indsutry saying it has had an impact on the ability of their to ensure resolution and recovery. In terms of capital base of the industry, 62% was held by the top three asset recast companies and 67% for top five, which the authors argue shows how the business remains highly concentrated. As per the article, of the total assets under management, about 62% and 76% were held by the top three and top five asset reconstruction companies in March 2020, respectively.

Security receipts

About 42 per cent of the outstanding SRs (security receipts) as on March 2020 were more than five years of age and would have to be redeemed over the next four years to avoid write-offs,” the paper said, pointing out at the difficulties being faced by the current set of ARCs in resolving the stress.

While resolving a case, ARCs pay a minor portion in cash to the selling bank while the rest is SRs to be paid over a time.

Security receipts are issued as an instrument to enable offloading of stressed assets, and to encourage recovery and resolution of dues.

It said due to capital constraints, there was a high dependence on bank funding for such asset reconstruction companies, with banks selling bad loans continuing to hold security receipts, despite regulatory disincentives. In March 2020, just two asset reconstruction companies held about 62% of the total security receipts issued. The paper said that banks holding such a large volume of security receipts limits secondary trading and effectively market-based price discovery.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI imposes Rs 40 lakh penalty on Himachal Pradesh State Cooperative Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai, Apr 27 () The RBI has imposed a penalty of Rs 40 lakh on Himachal Pradesh State Cooperative Bank, Shimla, for non-compliance with certain regulatory directions issued by NABARD. The penalty has been imposed for non-compliance with regulatory directions issued by NABARD contained in ‘Review of Frauds – Guidelines on Monitoring and Reporting System’, the Reserve Bank of India said on Tuesday.

Giving details, it said the statutory inspection of the bank conducted by the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) with reference to the bank’s financial position as on March 31, 2019 and the Inspection Report (IR) pertaining thereto, and examination of all related correspondence regarding reporting of frauds, revealed, inter alia, non-compliance of the directions.

A notice was issued to the Himachal Pradesh State Co-operative Bank. After considering the bank’s reply to the notice and oral submissions made in the personal hearing, the RBI said it came to the conclusion that the charge was substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary penalty.

The RBI, however, added penalty has been imposed on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers. NKD MR MR



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HODL your horses, cryptos face possible hurdles ahead, experts say, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Evolving rules, environmental concerns and competition from central banks threaten to undermine many of the world’s fast-growing crypto assets, crypto and macro experts said, while creating opportunities for those able to adapt.

Europe and the United States are both working on regulating digital assets and their providers – moves welcomed by investors, who hope the new ground rules will encourage institutional investors to plunge in.

Anatoly Crachilov, co-founder and CEO of Nickel Digital Asset Management, which manages assets worth $200 million, told the Reuters Global Markets Forum that regulatory uncertainty was a drag on the development of the crypto space.

He described the promise by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission‘s new Chairman Gary Gensler, to provide “guidance and clarity” to the market during his confirmation hearing in March, as a turning point.

For its part the European Commission‘s proposed “Markets in Crypto-assets,” or MiCA regulation, will regulate crypto-assets and their service providers in the European Union.

“It will be a new banking sector, with passporting possibilities,” digital asset trading solutions company H-Finance CEO Vytautas Zabulis said, referring to the prospect of EU-wide cryptocurrency trading licences.

Alongside the evolving regulatory framework, some countries, including China, Britain and Russia, are considering launching their own central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

That is likely to be followed by legislation to tax gains, said Robert Carnell, chief economist and head of research at ING Asia. “That may be the death knell for these other cryptocurrencies, though central bank coins are on the up and up,” he said.

Zabulis said that if CBDCs were developed in a way that they were “easy to interact with,” most digital currencies used for settlements will likely lose their both their goal and value.

There was not a big argument for bitcoin becoming a settlement tool, Zabulis cautioned. “Blockchain technology is for that, so, CBDCs will be built on blockchain.”

Bitcoin BTC=BTSP traded around $54,000 following a 10% surge on Monday, driven by reports that JPMorgan Chase JPM.N is planning to offer a managed bitcoin fund.

CBDCs are expected to have a limited impact on Bitcoin in particular, due to its progressively limited supply, which is in contrast to traditional fiat systems, Crachilov said.

“No central bank currency, however digital, can offer scarcity at this stage, as its supply can be inflated by a respective central bank issuing entity,” Crachilov said.

If China saw bitcoin as a threat to its own planned digital currency, that could affect the whole industry, Zabulis said.

GREEN REVOLUTION?
Creating crypto assets leaves a heavy carbon footprint, and is being increasingly seen as environmentally unsustainable.

ING Asia’s Carnell said there was “a strong argument on environmental grounds for limiting crypto mining, or at least having them offset their wasteful practices.”

However, bitcoin enthusiast Raoul Pal said he was not worried about the “unsustainability narrative”.

Pal, founder and CEO of on-demand financial TV channel Real Vision, said he believed it would drive a “green revolution” because in the end that was “the only way to win”.

Nickel Digital’s Crachilov said his fund was seeing a higher demand for ESG-compliant cryptos. “The price competition drives miners towards the cheapest sources of energy — renewables are increasingly falling into this category,” he said.

Ethereum 2 will use “proof of stake versus proof of work,” H-Finance’s Zabulis said. “It means that it will drastically reduce the energy needed” to mine it.

Garrett Minks, chief technology officer at Delaware-based RAIR Technologies, said the idea is to “trade brute force electricity burning with fancier math”.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

7 Of the 17 New Listings In 2021 Trade Below Their IPO Issue Price

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Investment

oi-Roshni Agarwal

|

Even as the secondary market is able to hold on its mojo despite the second Covid 19 wave threat, it is the new listings that have lost their euphoria. Currently, as many as half of the new listings that debuted in 2021 are trading below their issue price.

7 Of the 17 New Listings In 2021 Trade Below Their IPO Issue Price

7 Of the 17 New Listings In 2021 Trade Below Their IPO Issue Price

Of the total 17 listings, 8 are giving negative returns while the others have been witness to double digit growth. And the former 8 IPO companies include Anupam Rasayan, Easy Trip Planners, Home First Finance, Craftsman Automation, Suryoday Small Finance, IRFC and Kalyan Jewellers

New listing stocks Issue price Issue listing date LTP
Kalyan Jewellers Rs. 87 March 26, 2021 Rs. 61.4
IRFC Rs. 26 January 29, 2021 Rs. 21.2
Suryoday Small Finance Bank Rs. 305 March 26, 2021 Rs. 247
Craftsman Automation Rs. 1490 March 25, 2021 Rs. 1305
Brookfield India Real Estate Rs. 275 February 16, 2021 Rs. 243.38
Home First Finance Rs. 518 February 3, 2021 Rs. 466.5
Easy Trip planners Rs. 187 March 19, 2021 Rs. 182.55

Why the lag in new listing stocks?

As per experts, the fall in Nifty from the highs scaled in February, Covid 19 situation, profit booking are some of the reasons behind the selloff in some of the IPOs that made their way to the bourses in the current year. Nonetheless, if there is seen earnings pick up, stocks can again gain buying traction.

What to remember for retail investors when considering IPO investment?

IPO investment is not just for listing gains and this has been mostly the call for IPOs that listed in FY21. “Some of the IPOs were listed at exorbitant valuations which weren’t justified, thus leading to a fall in prices. Investors are advised to take informed decisions on IPOs keeping their risk and liquidity needs in mind and avoid issues that are weaker from a fundamental perspective. Quality issues with favourable valuations can be added on dips,” Nirali Shah of Samco Securities told a business daily.

Investor should also understand business model of the company, product growth cycle, longevity of its products, companies’ position in a given market should be understood i.e. whether it has created a niche for itself or enjoys a dominant position, or is a first of its kind company in a particular space.

GoodReturns.in



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NBFCs ask RBI for extended recast scheme, more liquidity support

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


“While the existing allocation for other sectors may continue at their prescribed limits, the additional Rs. 25,000 crore may be made available exclusively to medium and small NBFCs, through SIDBI for period of three years,” FIDC said.

As the impact of the latest wave of Covid infections starts to play out, non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) have asked the central bank to allow a fresh round of loan restructuring for businesses and consumers undergoing stress. In a letter to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), industry association Finance Industry Development Council (FIDC) has also sought liquidity support for on-lending to small businesses.

“It is feared that this second wave of Covid will peak sometimes in May and then possibly start climbing down in June. It will not be long before the NBFC industry starts reeling under pressure of increased NPAs (non-performing assets) and at the same time, handling demand of moratorium and/or restructuring from its existing and deserving customers,” FIDC said in its representation. It explained that a large number of borrowers in the NBFC segment are truck or taxi owners/drivers, machine operators, marginal farmers, small shopkeepers, stockists, local contractors and workshop owners. These categories of professionals are being hit by localised and state-wide lockdowns mandated in parts of the country, FIDC said.

The industry has requested that borrower accounts be allowed to undergo restructuring without any downgrade in asset classification, irrespective of whether they had been restructured on any earlier occasion as long as they were standard accounts as on March 31, 2021. It also suggested that the RBI could look to prescribe broad parameters for credit assessment of such accounts on the lines of recommendations made by the KV Kamath committee. This would help standardise the approach followed by lenders. They have also sought a standstill on asset classification of restructured accounts in Q1FY22.

The other requests are to ask banks and financial institutions to allow a one-time restructuring of loans given by them to NBFCs with a total asset size of under Rs 500 crore, and to increase the overall support outlay to all India financial institutions (AIFIs) to at least Rs 75,000 crore from Rs 50,000 crore. “While the existing allocation for other sectors may continue at their prescribed limits, the additional Rs. 25,000 crore may be made available exclusively to medium and small NBFCs, through SIDBI for period of three years,” FIDC said.

Lockdowns and other restrictions on mobility have already begun to hurt NBFCs’ collections. The microfinance sector’s collection efficiency has stalled at 90-94% in the past few months compared with the pre-pandemic level of 98-99%, Crisil Ratings said in a report earlier this month. Lenders are also likely to turn cautious again as during the first wave, particularly in the personal loan and business loan segments, analysts said. “As far as the SME business is concerned, it remains lackluster as lenders are shying away from new customers, while existing customers have already been extended the ECLGS (emergency credit line guarantee scheme) benefit, leaving no further scope to lend to existing customers,” Emkay Global Financial Services said in a recent report.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bajaj Finance consolidated net profit rises 42%

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


To optimize cost of funds and to benefit from lower interest rate environment, the company had paid down Rs 7,500 crone to banks in the last two quarters. The cost of funds for Q4FT21 was 7.39% compared 8.37% in Q4FT20.

Bajaj Finance on Tuesday reported a 42% year-on-year (YoY) rise in consolidated net profits for the quarter ended March to Rs 1,347 crore on account of a drop in loan loss provisions to Rs 1,231 crore as against Rs 1,954 crore in Q4FY20.

The NBFC’s net interest income fell 0.5% to Rs 4,659 crore. Interest income reversal for the quarter was Rs 298 crore as compared to Rs 122 crore in Q4FY20.

The firm’s gross NPA was higher at 1.79% compared with 1.61% in Q4FY20 while the net NPA was at 0.75% compared to 0.65% in Q4FY20 .

Assets under management grew by 4% during Q4FY21. A diversified business model had enabled the company to revert to pre-Covid levels of AUM, the company said. New loans booked during the quarter was lower at 5.47 million as against 6.03 million in Q4FY20. Except auto finance, new loans origination across businesses had gone to pre-Covid levels. Customer franchise as of March 31, 2021 stood at 48.57 million as against 42.60 million as of March 2020. The company acquired 2.26 million new customers in Q4FY21 as compared to 1.85 million in Q4FY20.

Rajeev Jain, MD of Bajaj Finance, said, barring a national lockdown or extended lockdowns in three to four large GDP contributing states or another moratorium on loan repayment, the company was confident of delivering its long term guidance metrics in FY22.

Jain said at an investor presentation that the disruption in the first quarter could be reasonably mitigated in the balance three quarters of FY22. The company was watching the situation closely and taking appropriate action to navigate through this, Jain said.

Bajaj Finance long term guidance is to grow AUM in the corridor of 25% to 27%, profit growth in the corridor of 23% to 24% and gross NPA in the 1.4% to 1.7% range with net NPA at 0.4% to 0.7%

The company said it had done an accelerated write off in the quarter of Rs 1,530 crore due to Covid related stress and advancement of its write-off policy. After this write-off, the company still holds a management overlay and macro provision of Rs 840 crore and was covered for loans losses and provisions.

The company had a liquidity buffer of Rs 16,485 crore as on March 31, 2021. To optimise cost of funds and to benefit from lower interest rate environment, the company had paid down Rs 7,500 crore to banks in the last two quarters. The cost of funds for Q4FY21 was 7.39% compared 8.37% in Q4FY20.

“Most businesses had started disbursing 90-105% of last year’s volumes with incremental growth being observed every month,” Jain said. The company’s business transformation plan was on track and the company would be launching its omnichannel 3-in-1 financial services in a phased manner by August and September ’21 and this would help in accelerating market share, he said. The omnichannel model would enable customers to move between online to office and vice-versa in a frictionless manner.

The Bajaj Pay for consumers has gone live with the Bharat Bill Pay System and a fully functional UPI would go live by May 2021 after getting regulatory clearance. The insurance and investment marketplace apps would be going live between July and August ’21.
The company’s board recommended a dividend of Rs 10 per equity share of the face value of Rs 2 for FY21.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Axis Bank back in the black with Q4 net profit of 2,677 cr

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


This is despite the bank making additional provision aggregating Rs8.0bn on accounting change in provisioning rates on loans to commercial banking segment.

Private lender Axis Bank on Tuesday reported a net profit of Rs 2,677 crore for the March quarter compared to a loss of Rs 1,388 crore in Q4FY20. The lender was back in the black thanks to an 11% year-on-year (y-o-y) growth in its net interest income (NII) to Rs 7,555 crore.

The lender’s operating profit increased 17% y-o-y and 13% quarter-on-quarter (q-o-q) to Rs 6,865 crore. The bottom-line also got a support from reduced provisioning by the lender. Provisions declined 57% y-o-y and 28% q-o-q to Rs 3,295 crore. However, the bank holds provisions of Rs 5,012 crore as on March 31, 2021 against the potential impact of Covid-19.

Amitabh Chaudhry, MD and CEO of the bank, said, “There will be economic impact of the second wave of Covid-19 but we are hopeful that it will be short-lived. We have transformed ourselves in line with the evolving business scenario to become more agile, more relevant and totally dedicated to the needs of millions of customers,” he added.

The net interest margins (NIM) of the lender declined 3 basis point (bps) sequentially to 3.56%, but showed a growth of 1 bps on a y-o-y basis.
The asset quality of the lender improved during the March quarter. Gross non-performing assets (NPAs) ratio of the lender declined 85 bps to 3.7% from 4.55% in the December 2020 quarter. Similarly, the net NPAs ratio declined 14 bps to 1.19% from 0.74% in the December quarter. “Gross slippages during the quarter were Rs 5,285 crore, compared to Rs 7,993 crore during Q3FY21 and Rs 3,920 crore in Q4FY20,” Chaudhry said. “Recoveries and upgrades from NPAs during the quarter remained at Rs 3,462 crore, while write-offs were Rs 5,553 crore,” he added.

The provisioning coverage ratio (PCR) improved to 72% in the fourth quarter, compared to 69% in the same quarter last year. “On an aggregated basis, our provision coverage ratio stands at 120% gross NPAs,” the bank said.

Credit costs for the lender more than halved at 1.21% during the March quarter from 2.77% during Q4FY20.

The fee income during the March quarter stood at Rs 3,376 crore, up 15% y-o-y and 16% q-o-q. Retail fees grew 16% y-o-y and 17% q-o-q and constituted 64% of the bank’s total fee income. The trading profits and miscellaneous income for the quarter stood at Rs 789 crore and Rs 503 crore respectively. Overall, non-interest income for Q4FY21 grew 17% y-o-y to Rs 4,668 crore.

Advances grew 9% y-o-y and 7% q-o-q to Rs 6.23 lakh crore. Retail disbursements for the quarter were at new all-time highs as per lender. Disbursements in the consumer segment were up 45% y-o-y and 44% q-o-q. Similarly, rural disbursements grew 47% on a y-o-y as well as sequential basis.

The total deposits grew by 10% y-o-y to Rs 7.07 lakh crore. On a quarterly average basis (QAB) , savings account deposits grew 17% y-o-y and 6% q-o-q. Retail savings deposits grew 20% y-o-y, current account deposits grew 18% y-o-y and 10% sequentially.

The capital adequacy ratio (CAR) including profit for FY21 stood at 19.12% with CET 1 ratio of 15.4% at the end of March, 2021.

The board has authorised the bank to raise funds up to Rs 35,000 crore. The funds can be raised in Indian or foreign currency by issue of debt instruments including but not limited to long-term bonds, non-convertible debentures, perpetual debt instruments, additional tier 1 (AT 1) bonds, infrastructure bonds and tier II capital bonds.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 10 11 12 13 14 95