Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Tender No: RBI/Kanpur/Estate/348/20-21/ET/512

With reference to the e-tender dated February 05, 2021, it is advised that the last date of submission of the e-tender in the MSTC portal has been extended from March 15, 2021, 09:00 AM to March 22, 2021 till 12:00 PM.

1. Now the E-tender will be opened on March 22, 2021 at 03:00 PM.

2. Other conditions in the tender remain unchanged.

Firms / Companies who have already submitted tenders pursuant to the notice dated February 05, 2021 need not apply again.

Regional Director
Reserve Bank of India
Kanpur

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less




April 14, 2015





Dear All




Welcome to the refurbished site of the Reserve Bank of India.





The two most important features of the site are: One, in addition to the default site, the refurbished site also has all the information bifurcated functionwise; two, a much improved search – well, at least we think so but you be the judge.





With this makeover, we also take a small step into social media. We will now use Twitter (albeit one way) to send out alerts on the announcements we make and YouTube to place in public domain our press conferences, interviews of our top management, events, such as, town halls and of course, some films aimed at consumer literacy.




The site can be accessed through most browsers and devices; it also meets accessibility standards.



Please save the url of the refurbished site in your favourites as we will give up the existing site shortly and register or re-register yourselves for receiving RSS feeds for uninterrupted alerts from the Reserve Bank.



Do feel free to give us your feedback by clicking on the feedback button on the right hand corner of the refurbished site.



Thank you for your continued support.




Department of Communication

Reserve Bank of India


Next

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI awarded mandate for first SOFR-linked ECB deal by IOC

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State Bank of India (SBI), on Tuesday, said it has been awarded the mandate for the first Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)-linked $100 million External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) deal by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (IOCL) for five years.

SOFR is an identified replacement for US Dollar London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which is expected to be phased out at the end of 2021.

The LIBOR sunset has been triggered by the decision of Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in UK not to compel contributing banks for LIBOR calculation after December 2021.

C Venkat Nageswar, Deputy Managing Director (International Banking Group), SBI, in a statement, noted that this deal is the first SOFR deal in the ECB space, demonstrating that SBI has aligned its systems and processes to embrace Alternate Reference Rates (ARRs).

IOCL, India’s largest public sector Oil Marketing Company, by availing the first SOFR-linked ECB, will set the pace for smooth transition by Indian Corporates to ARR mechanism, he added.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated March 15, 2021, imposed a monetary penalty of ₹2 Crore (Rupees Two Crore only) on State Bank of India (the bank) for contravention of provisions of section 10 (1) (b) (ii) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (the Act) and specific directions of RBI issued to the bank on payment of remuneration to employees in the form of commission. This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers vested in RBI under the provisions of section 47 A (1) (c) read with sections 46 (4) (i) and 51 (1) of the Act.

This action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers.

Background

The statutory inspection of the bank with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018 and the Risk Assessment Reports (RARs) pertaining thereto, and examination of the correspondence with the bank regarding payment of remuneration to its employees in the form of commission, revealed, inter alia, contravention of the provisions of the Act and aforesaid specific directions issued by RBI. In furtherance to the same, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed for contravention of the provisions of the Act/ specific directions issued by RBI. After considering the bank’s replies to the notice, oral submissions made in the personal hearing and examination of additional submissions made by it, RBI came to the conclusion that the aforesaid charges were substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary penalty.

(Yogesh Dayal)     
Chief General Manager

Press Release: 2020-2021/1250

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Perpetual bond yields move up 25-35 bps

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The yields on perpetual bonds floated by banks have moved up 25-35 basis points in the past two days following the SEBI circular on valuation of mutual fund investment in these bonds and the subsequent Ministry of Finance letter directing SEBI to withdraw the circular.

The MF industry has invested about ₹35,000 crore in perpetual bonds of banks with tenure of 100 years.

The top four mutual funds alone hold 80 per cent of the investment in these bonds.

Last week, SEBI directed mutual funds to value the perpetual bonds as a 100-year instrument and limit investments to 10 per cent of the assets of a scheme.

According to SEBI, these instruments could be riskier than other debt instruments.

Mahendra Jajoo, CIO – Fixed Income, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, said the yields will further move up by 50-75 basis points if SEBI retains the circular without any changes, as there is nervousness and uncertainty over the regulator’s next move.

Though the investment cap prescribed by SEBI is absolutely fine, the net asset value (NAV) of schemes holding these bonds will come down if yields firm up further, he added.

Risk profile

SEBI has a valid point in restricting the mutual fund investment in these perpetual bonds as the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation and insurance companies including LIC, which manage long-term money of investors, do not invest in these bonds due to its risk profile, said an analyst tracking mutual fund investments.

Moreover, some short-term debt schemes have also made huge investment in these perpetual bonds, breaching their investment mandate and putting investors’ money at risk, he added.

The RBI had recently allowed a complete write-off of ₹8,400 crore on AT1 bonds issued by YES Bank as part of a bailout package led by State Bank of India.

Perpetual bond prices fall if yields firm up, and the NAV of the schemes which hold these bonds will go down. Mutual funds will be forced to sell other debt paper to meet the redemption pressure.

Subsequently, the quantum of investment in AT1 bonds of these schemes will move up and test the 10 per cent cap imposed by SEBI. It is a sort of double whammy and needs to be dealt with immediately, he said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Interest of bank employees will be protected, says FM

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday said that every interest of the personnel in banks that are likely to be privatised will be fully protected. She also said that interests of those who put in decades of service in these banks will “absolutely be protected– whether it is their salaries, pension, etc”.

“Even in financial sector, we will still have the presence of public sector enterprise. This means not all of them (banks) are going to be privatised,” she said, after a Cabinet meeting that approved a new Development Financial Institution.

‘More equity’

“We want financial institutions to get more equity and make them more sustainable. We want their staff to perform duties which they have acquired as a skill over the decades and run the banks. So to quickly conclude that every bank is going to be sold off is not right,” she said. Besides IDBI Bank, the government is looking to privatise two public sector banks and a general insurance company.

‘Have serious discussions’

Responding to a media query on comments made, usually as two liners, by Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi, the Finance Minister said she would want him to engage in serious discussions rather than “throw these kind of two liners every now and then”.

 

She refuted his reported remarks that the current government was “privatising profits and nationalising loss” and highlighted that the erstwhile UPA regime were only resorting to “privatising taxpayers money”.

On the issue of allegations of nationalising losses, Sitharaman said that today public sector banks are loss making and prompt corrective actions are bringing them out because of the “telephone banking that happened during his time (UPA government)”.

“Nationalising corruption and privatising taxpayers money for the betterment of one family is what Rahul Gandhi should take as a reply for the tweet that some outsourced fellow in his team is feeding him with. He should be ready to stand for discussions and not throw allegations and go away,” she added.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India, in the public interest, had issued directions to Padmashri Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil Co-operative Bank Ltd., Nashik, Maharashtra in exercise of powers vested in it under sub-section (1) of Section 35A read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (AACS) from the close of business on May 19, 2018. These directions were modified from time to time, the validity of which was last extended upto March 17, 2021. These directions shall continue to apply to the bank for a further period of three months from March 18, 2021 to June 17, 2021, subject to review. The Directions stipulate certain restrictions and / or ceiling on withdrawal / acceptance of deposits. A copy of Directions is displayed at the bank’s premises for interested members of public to peruse. Reserve Bank of India may consider modifications of the Directions depending upon the circumstances. The issue of Directions should not per se be construed as cancellation of banking license by the Reserve Bank of India. The bank will continue to undertake banking business with restrictions till its financial position improves.

(Yogesh Dayal)     
Chief General Manager

Press Release: 2020-2021/1249

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Private Retirement Funds can now invest in Alternative Investment Fund

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Private retirement funds will now get a new investment option in the form Alternative Investment Funds (AIF), but with certain conditions.

The Economic Affairs Department, in the Finance Ministry, has notified the changes in the investment pattern for Non-Government Provident Fund, Superannuation Funds and Gratuity Funds. According to the notification, these funds can now invest in units issued by Category I and Category II Alternative Investment Funds (AIF) regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).

Category 1 of AIF includes venture capital funds, including Angel Funds, SME Funds, Social Venture Funds and Infrastructure funds. Category 2 includes those funds, where at least 51 per cent of the corpus can be invested in either of the infrastructure entities or SMEs, or venture capital or social welfare entities. Category 3 AIFs employ diverse or complex trading strategies and invest in listed or unlisted derivatives.

Five conditions

The latest notification by the Finance Ministry has laid five conditions for investment by private retirement funds. Funds will invest only in those AIFs whose corpus is equal to or more than ₹100 crore. The exposure to a single AIF shall not exceed 10 per cent of the AIF size. However, this limit would not apply to a government-sponsored AIF. Funds must ensure that investment should not be made directly or indirectly in securities of the companies or funds incorporated and/or operated outside India.

The sponsor of the AIF should not be the promoter in the fund or the promoter group of the fund. And AIFs shall not be managed by investment manager, who is directly or indirectly controlled or managed by the fund or the promoter group of the fund.

SEBI defines AIF as any fund established or incorporated in India, which is a privately pooled investment vehicle that collects funds from sophisticated investors, whether Indian or foreign, for investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of its investors.

According to Sunil Gidwani, Partner with Nangia Andersen LLP, currently private retirement funds such as PF, SF and gratuity funds are expected to invest largely (80 per cent) in low-risk papers – G-secs and debt securities. A small portion of their corpus can be invested in riskier asset classes such as equity and other papers. Such funds can invest up to 5 per cent in asset-backed and trust-structured investments such as REITS, InvITs and ARC trusts. But with this change, the window of 5 per cent has now been opened up for investments in AIF Category I and II, subject to several conditions.

“The government’s intention clearly seems to be not just to provide for one more avenue for investment by the private retirement funds for bettering their returns, but to attract investments in identified sectors. This is probably the first time that the investment is being permitted in unlisted securities which are not so liquid,” said Gidwani.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bill to regulate cryptocurrencies likely to be delayed

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Government on Wednesday indicated that a bill to regulate cryptocurrencies may be delayed. However, it said the effort is on to bring the bill during the current session itself.

“5-6 key bills related to Finance Ministry are in the queue. We may or may not be able to bring the crypto bill during the session,” a top government official told reporters here. On the eve of the budget session, the Lok Sabha bulletin published list of 20 bills to be introduced during the session. One such bill is “The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021.”

The bill aims “To create a facilitative framework for creation of the official digital currency to be issued by the Reserve Bank of India. The Bill also seeks to prohibit all private cryptocurrencies in India; however, it allows for certain exceptions to promote the underlying technology of crytptocurrency and its uses,” purport of the bill as mentioned in Lok Sabha bulletin said.

 

The bill appears to be based on a recommendation given by SC Garg Committee formed by the Centre. The Committee had recommended banning cryptocurrencies and allow an official digital currency. At this moment, and especially after a Supreme Court verdict, one can buy and sell virtual currency, but there is no legal framework, available making it riskier.

The intent to bring a bill caused a debate, especially when bitcoin first touched $50000, then $55000 and now $61000. Considering India’s interest, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has already put it on record that India is not shutting off all options when it comes to cryptocurrency or blockchain and fintech. On Wednesday, the official quoted above reiterated the stand.

This raised investors’ hopes that the authorities might go easier on the booming market. However, another official clarified that the bill would give holders of cryptocurrencies up to six months to liquidate, after which penalties will be levied,

Last week, in response to a question in Rajya Sabha, Minister of State for Finance Anurag Singh Thakur had said that the regulatory bodies like the RBI, SEBI, etc., don’t have any legal framework to directly regulate cryptocurrencies as they are neither currencies nor assets nor securities nor commodities issued by identifiable users. The existing laws are inadequate to deal with the subject.

The Government formed an Inter-Ministerial Committee, which has given its report. Then there was a meeting of the Empowered Technology Group. Then the Committee of Secretaries chaired by the Cabinet Secretary has also given its report. “The Bill is being finalised, and it will soon be sent to the Cabinet. We will soon be bringing a Bill,” he had said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

We will try to grow our business in a very calibrated way: IDBI Bank CEO

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Now that IDBI Bank is out of the restrictive prompt corrective action (PCA) framework, it will grow its loan book in a calibrated manner to avoid concentration risk, according to its MD and CEO, Rakesh Sharma.

Though the bank’s growth was shackled due to the PCA framework, which was imposed by the RBI in 2017 in view of its high non-performing assets and negative return on assets, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) threw a ₹21,624-crore lifeline to the bank in FY19.

In an interaction with BusinessLine, Sharma emphasised that the bank is on safe ground. In the context of the government’s plan to divest 45.48 per cent stake in the bank, he observed that employees need not worry vis-a-vis this development and should only focus on performance. Excerpts:

What does coming out of PCA mean for the bank?

First, let me tell you the disadvantages of being under PCA. Our balance-sheet size was shrinking. We were not able to grow our corporate advances, including loans to ‘AAA’ and ‘AA’-rated corporates. As business was coming down, our revenue was also coming down. We were not able to open branches. It is not that we want to be very aggressive.

But yes, so many restrictions were there. Even for small expenditure, we had to take rgw RBI’s approval. All this was basically hindering the growth of the bank.

But we have been able to stop the slippages to a large extent. We have also done recoveries and our provision coverage ratio (97 per cent) is quite high. In the last four years, we have worked on our risk management policies, corporate governance, and internal housekeeping. We have been able to improve upon them.

Now that we are out of PCA, we will be free to do any type of business. But learning from the past, we will avoid concentration/ overexposure to certain industries. We will try to grow our business in a very calibrated way so that we are able to increase the income and improve our efficiency parameters.

Now that you are out of PCA, will you be changing the retail to corporate loan mix?

Earlier, we were a corporate bank. So, corporate loans accounted for 67 per cent of our total loans in Q4 FY16. As of now, corporate loans account for only 40 per cent of our total loans. So, 60 per cent of our loan book is retail. As per our board-approved policy, our target is that more than 55 per cent of our total loan book should be retail and 45 per cent corporate. We want to maintain low-cost deposits, which was at about 49 per cent of total deposits in Q3 FY21, at about 47-48 per cent.

We will grow our loan book at about 8-10 per cent in FY22. Next year, we want to increase our net interest margin beyond three per cent (2.79 per cent in Q3 FY21). Our target for RoA, which, in December 2020 quarter was 0.51 per cent, is to take it 0.60 per cent next year and gradually increase it further.

We want to focus more on lending to selective industries and not just infrastructure. So, manufacturing will be our major focus where good securities are visible. We will also take selective exposure to infrastructure projects, but in a calibrated way. Right now, our standard advances are at ₹1.20-lakh crore. Our corporate advances are at around ₹48,000 crore. In FY22, we are envisaging more than 12 per cent growth in retail loans, but in corporate loans the growth will be 8-10 per cent.

Will you be expanding your branch network?

We have not expanded our branch network in the last four years. We will not be very aggressive on this front. If we feel that in some area our presence is not there, then we can open branches. But in these days of digital banking, Business Correspondent and Business Faciliator networks, brick-and-mortar branches are not required.

So, we will be depending more on these alternative channels. But yes, there is no restriction as such on branch opening now.

Our cost-to-income ratio was 57 per cent as of March-end 2020, and in the third quarter of FY21 it was around 52 per cent. So, although we have been able to control our expenditure, the denominator (income) was not increasing. Our target is to bring this ratio below 50 per cent by March 2022. So, while we will keep the cost under control, we will push up the income.

Will depositors’ perception about IDBI Bank not change once the government sells its stake in the bank?

Customers, especially depositors, can draw comfort from the fact that now our capital adequacy ratio is 14.77 per cent; we have earned profit continuously for the last five quarters; and other ratios such as liquidity coverage ratio are much above the RBI’s norms.

So, the comfort we can give to our customers is that we will be improving the performance of our bank in such a way that it becomes sound. There are private banks that are sound. Our customers will have the comfort that we will become one of the good and sound banks.

How are you addressing employees’ anxiety regarding the government selling its stake in the bank?

Our employees were also anxious when LIC was taking 51 per cent in our bank. There were court cases also. But finally, our bank won…I conducted town halls in almost all the big cities where I addressed the employees. I reached out to all employees by writing to them that they should not worry.

Ultimately, every promoter wants good workers/ performers. So, we have to focus on performance….It is not as if with a new promoter everything is going to change. Work/performance related incentive will be there…I have been giving this message that they need not worry. They have to focus on performance.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 48 49 50 51 52 96