Piramal Capital and Housing Finance raises ₹4,050 crore through NCDs

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd (PCHFL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Piramal Enterprises Limited (PEL), has raised ₹4,050 crore through issuance of long-term, five-year non-convertible debentures (NCDs) in two tranches.

The first tranche of the NCD issue, amounting to ₹2,000 crore, opened on March 10 with a pay-in on March 12, 2021. The second tranche of the remaining ₹2,050 crore opened on March 18 with a pay-in on March 19, 2021.

“CARE Ratings has assigned an ‘AA’ rating for both the issuances,” the company said in a statement on Monday.

DHFL deal

The fund raise comes just weeks after the Reserve Bank of India gave PCHFL the approval to acquire troubled Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL). The total consideration for DHFL was ₹34,250 crore, comprising an upfront cash component of ₹14,700 crore and a deferred component of ₹19,550 crore.

“The five-year NCD issuances of ₹4,050 crore re-affirm the significant improvement of our liabilities side and strength of our balance sheet. We are now well-positioned to tap growth opportunities across both our financial services and pharma businesses,” said Rajesh Laddha, Executive Director, PEL.

The statement noted that PEL has transformed its liabilities profile towards more long-term borrowings and has raised over ₹50,000 crore since April 2019.

“It has raised over ₹32,000 crore of long-term borrowings since April 2019, while significantly reducing the Commercial Paper exposure from ₹18,017 crore in September 2018 to ₹1,050 crore as of December 2020,” it added.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Transfer assets at book value, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A parliamentary panel has recommended the transfer of stressed loans of banks to the proposed bad bank at book value amid the calls for an asset quality review.

The panel feels that the more time such assets are left on the lenders’ balance sheet the more is the chances of their value eroding.

“RBI can play an instrumental role in the success of Bad Bank if they issue an order or notification which makes the entire process crystal clear, defining each step of the procedure, thus removing any ambiguity or discretion from the bank’s side,” said the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance.

The move will help in saving time and avoiding delays in resolving soured loans through consolidated decision making, the panel said

It also asked the Reserve Bank of India to clearly define every step of the procedure to remove any ambiguity or discretion from the banks’ side. “The RBI needs to demonstrate why their proposed rules for loss transfer to the ARC-AMC is in fact the best approach,” the panel said, adding that their rules should reflect both administrative clarity as well as economic logic,..

The RBI should intervene as soon as possible to unlock value from non-performing assets, it said.

Economic survey

Earlier, the Economic Survey 2021 had called for another round of asset quality review when the Covid related forbearance is lifted, the latest edition of the economic survey argued. The survey stated that it was important for the Reserve Bank of India to do a complete clean-up exercise of bank balance sheets after granting every regulatory forbearance.

Information asymmetry

“A clean-up of bank balance sheets is necessary when the forbearance is discontinued,” the economic survey suggested. “Note that while the 2016 AQR exacerbated the problems in the banking sector, the lesson from the same is not that an AQR should not be conducted. Given the problem of asymmetric information between the regulator and the banks, which gets accentuated during the forbearance regime, an AQR exercise must be conducted immediately after the forbearance is withdrawn.”

The survey had also suggested that the banking regulator should strengthen its early warning signal systems to figure out cracks in bank balance sheets early on. “The asset quality review must account for all the creative ways in which banks can evergreen their loans,” the economic survey noted.

“In this context, it must be emphasized that advance warning signals that do not serve their purpose of ageing concerns may create a false sense of security. The banking regulator needs to be more equipped in the early detection of fault lines and must expand the toolkit of ex-ante remedial measures.”

Why fresh AQR?

After the debt binge of 2008-10, the banks had piled up huge NPAs but were not revealing them while resorting to ever-greening of loans. This led to the RBI ordering an AQR in 2015, which brought out the massive pile of bad loans. This time too due to moratorium and subsequent SC order to not tag bad loans as NPAs has led to a situation that banks may be hiding similar stress in the book.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SIP or Lumpsum: Which Option Will Give Better Returns in Mutual Funds?

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Planning

oi-Sneha Kulkarni

|

Mutual funds are market-linked investments that do not guarantee a certain rate of return. They do, however, provide active risk management as well as a diversified investment portfolio. Mutual funds invest in a variety of asset classes, including equity and debt. The nature of the scheme and the risk profile it carries determine how assets are allocated. The performance of a mutual fund is thought to be influenced by market movements as well as the performance of its underlying assets. You can invest in mutual funds in one of two ways: through a systematic investment plan (SIP) or by making a one-time lump sum investment. Both approaches have advantages, and the decision should depend on what is more advantageous for you as an investor. Before we make our decision, let’s take a closer look at the differences between a SIP and a lump sum investment.

SIP or Lumpsum: Which Option Will Give Better Returns in Mutual Funds?

What is a SIP?

A systematic Investment Plan is a method of investing that requires a monthly commitment to save and invest. In this case, a predetermined amount is automatically deducted from your bank account and invested in the mutual fund schemes you choose. The idea behind a SIP is simple, you start by deciding how much money you want to save and invest each month. The second step entails deciding which funds to invest in. This method of investing involves investing in the markets at both high and low levels, resulting in a weighted average return over time. The number of units you accumulate is determined by the current market price of the investment product on a given date. In other words, SIPs benefit you during market downturns because you can buy more units at a lower price. SIPs are perfect for new investors and those who have a consistent cash flow.

Benefit of SIP

SIP promotes a methodical approach to investing. On the specified date, your bank account is directly debited by the predetermined amount. As a result, you will be unable to postpone your investment due to a lack of funds within a specific time period. The key to accumulating wealth is to begin investing early and consistently. A small amount of money invested on a regular basis through a SIP will develop into a substantial sum. Your interest receives interest, allowing you to accrue a sizable sum of money through the power of compounding. It’s difficult to predict when the market will reach its apex or bottom. Investing through a systematic investment plan (SIP) eliminates the need to time the market. While SIPs are not immune to market volatility, you do not need to be concerned about market movements.

What is Lump Sum Investment?

If you have a large sum of money and want to invest it, you can do so by taking it all into one investment option. This is known as a lump sum investment. When you make a lump sum investment, you put all of your money into a single mutual fund. If you have invested in an open-ended scheme, you can choose any amount and withdraw it whenever you want. These are often used by seasoned investors who have both experience and knowledge of the financial markets as well as cash on hand. When the market and stock valuations are low, a lump sum investment is advantageous. It’s also a good idea when the market’s and individual stocks’ price-earnings (P/E) multiples are low.

Benefits of Lumpsum investments

If you have the expertise and experience, investing a lump sum and rolling it over according to market conditions will help you build a substantial corpus over time. When you invest a big lump sum and keep it invested for a long time, you should understand the power of compounding. Appreciation and interest are two ways that your money earns money. Since you spend the entire amount at the beginning of a lumpsum investment, you benefit from the upward price movement for the duration of the bull run. If you’re going to invest in lump sums, make sure you do so in multiples to capture different market/NAV levels. This is the only way to reduce the risk of timing the market.

SIP Vs LumpsumSIP vs. Lumpsum – a comparison of the two processes

  • When you invest in a lump sum during a market low, you get the best results. SIPs, on the other hand, allow you to invest at different times of the market cycle. Investors do not have to keep as close an eye on market moves as they would with lump-sum investments.
  • With as little as Rs. 500 per month, you can start investing in SIPs. Lump-sum investments, on the other hand, require at least Rs.5,000,
  • Because SIPs require you to set aside a fixed amount of money on a regular basis, you will become financially disciplined.
  • SIP investments receive interest, which is re-invested in the scheme. The compounding effect aids in generating higher returns in this case.

The potential returns on a lump sum investment of Rs. 300,000 in an equity fund with a 12-percent annual return will be around Rs. 5,25,000 after five years. If you divide it into monthly SIPs of Rs. 5,000 in the same scheme with the same returns for five years, the total returns will be close to Rs 410,000.

SIP or Lumpsum: Which Will Give Better Returns in Mutual Funds?

A combination of SIP and lump sum investing is the most effective approach. You can earn higher returns over a three to five-year period if you spend a lump sum during lower market levels and make periodic SIP investments. Both SIP and lump sum investments have advantages, as shown above. It is up to you to decide which option is best for you. While SIPs are more cost-effective and convenient, to begin with, a lump-sum investment will yield higher returns, particularly during bull markets. You must, however, exercise discipline and remain well-informed. It’s difficult to buy at the exact bottom of the market. The key to successful investing is to buy low and sell high, as well as to be disciplined with your investment. SIP may be a better choice if you are new to mutual funds and plan to invest in something like an equity scheme. You should still seek the advice of a financial adviser to assist you in making the best decision possible.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Transacting At Non-Home Branch of SBI & Other Banks? Check The Charges Here

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Planning

oi-Vipul Das

|

A fee is charged for any cash transaction made at a non-home branch, including a deposit or withdrawal. This charge varies from bank to bank. Furthermore, certain banks levy charges even when a third party conducts a cash transaction. Transacting at a non-home bank branch has a number of drawbacks. An individual usually opens a savings bank account at a bank’s home branch. This account is effectively tied to that branch, and all other branches of the same bank are designated as non-home branches. Even for small cash transactions customers of non-home branches need to pay a ‘cash handling charge’ which again varies across banks. To recoup their expenses, banks charge customers for a variety of services. Some common charges that are imposed by the banks are demand draft, duplicate statement, and so on. So if you are planning to transact at a non-home bank branch of SBI, ICICI, HDFC or Axis Bank, here are the applicable charges that you need to know:

Transacting At Non-Home Branch of SBI & Other Banks? Check The Charges Here

Charges levied by SBI Bank

You can withdraw up to Rs 50,000 per day from a non-home branch, the limit is capped at Rs 1 lakh for current account holders by SBI. The maximum amount of funds that can be deposited at an SBI non-home branch in a single day is Rs 2 lakh. Cash withdrawals at home and at non-home branches (fees based on transaction amount) – Small/no-frill deposits are not applicable as per SBI. Tatkal Money Remittance for Non-home transactions (Deposit to Core by cash/transfer) is charged at 1% of the remitted amount, with a minimum of Rs 10 and a maximum of Rs 100. Non-home branches of the SBI do not impose duplicate fixed deposit receipts if you have an account with them. Loan discharge via cash reimbursement or account transfer is also not permitted at a non-home branch. Furthermore, you cannot extend your public provident fund (PPF) account up to a block of 5 years after fifteen years of lock-in period by submitting an application at a non-home branch. It’s important to remember here is that, under the new rules, the bank will charge account holders each time a transaction fails due to a lack of funds. The fee for a failed transaction, according to the SBI website, is Rs 20 plus GST. In addition, SBI has stated in its new regulations that it would charge customers for non-financial transactions. Customers will also be levied Rs 10 plus GST to Rs 20 plus GST for “any additional transactions above the limits specified,” according to the SBI website.

Charges levied by ICICI Bank

ICICI Bank does not charge fees for cash transactions up to Rs 25,000 per day at non-home branches. For an amount higher than Rs 25,000, a fee of Rs 5 per Rs 1,000 is charged, with a minimum of Rs 150. The total amount of third-party cash transactions for deposits and withdrawals is capped at Rs 25,000 per transaction and Rs 150 per transaction, respectively.

Charges levied by HDFC Bank

HDFC Bank allows Rs.1,00,000/- per account per day as an operational limit for cash deposits at non-home branches. The bank allows free cash withdrawals up to Rs. 1,00,000/- per day at non-home branches, after which charges Rs.2 up to Rs 1000, with a minimum of Rs.50/- per transaction; third party cash withdrawals are limited to Rs. 50,000/- per transaction by HDFC Bank respectively.

Charges levied by Axis Bank

For both cash deposits at home and non-home branches, Axis Bank allows a free limit of Rs 2 lakh for current account holders. Whereas charges are levied at Rs 50 per transaction for the deposit of 4/1,000. ATM Transaction Fees for Post Transaction Limits will be charged at Rs.20 per transaction (Financial + Non-Financial) on Axis Bank and non-Axis Bank ATMs starting August 1, 2020. The monthly free limit (Self/Third Party) is capped for the first four transactions or Rs.2 lakhs, whichever comes first. The bank will charge you Rs.5 for Rs.1000 or Rs.150, whichever is higher if you go over your free limit. The bank will charge Rs.5/- per thousand or part thereof, subject to a minimum of Rs.150/-, for cash transactions at non-home branches up to Rs.25,000/- per day.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

A flurry of insolvency applications soon as IBC suspension uplifts on March 24, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) which is currently under suspension till March 24, 2021 in the backdrop of Covid-19 pandemic will now make a return as the economy strongly recovers, said KR Saji Kumar, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice on Saturday.

Speaking at a virtual event of ETCFO.com, he said, “There isn’t any request from any stakeholders to continue with the suspension…We are not going for any more suspension. The gates are going to be opened 25th March 2021.”.

He believes the return of the law could possibly see flood of insolvency application at the courts but the regulation and systems have matured to deal with the surge in insolvency applications.

Kumar said, “We are again going to witness flood of applications, maybe another challenges to IBC process…But we have learnings now. We will be able to deal with it.”

He backs the government’s decision to put a halt on the regulation as it was need of the hour back then as the economy was in peril at that point in time.

The central government had suspended the IBC regulation to prevent businesses from going bankrupt due to Covid-19 related stress. The initial ban was for six months but was later extended for up to a year till March 24, 2021. Post which, the central bank had come up with one-time restructuring under its June 7 (2019) circular dealing with resolution of stressed assets.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘Be more transparent in health insurance claims settlement’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Insurance sector regulator Irdai has asked all insurers to be more transparent in their health insurance claim settlement process and apprise the policyholders of reasons in case of denial of claims filed.

It it essential that all insurers establish procedures to let policyholders get clear and transparent communication at various stages of claim process, Irdai said in a circular. “All the insurers shall ensure putting in place systems to enable policyholders track the status of cashless requests/claims filed with the insurer/TPA through the website/portal/app or any other authorised electronic means on an ongoing basis,” said the regulator.

The circular on ‘Health Insurance Claims Settlement’ is addressed to life, general and standalone health insurance companies including the third party administrators (TPAs).

It has said insurers should ensure that policyholders are provided granular details of the payments, amounts disallowed and the reasons for the amount disallowed, as per the regulatory norms.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Digital lending: Government blocks 27 fraud lending apps offering instant credit online

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India’s digital lending value had jumped from $33 billion in FY15 to $150 billion in FY20 and is likely to grow to the $350-billion mark by FY23.

Following the ban on over 250 apps of Chinese origin ranging across categories such as social network, gaming, e-commerce, news, business, photo and video editing, and more, the government of India has now come down heavily on lending or loan apps offering instant credit over the internet. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) had received a request from the Ministry of Home Affairs for blocking 27 loan lending apps and after due process, MeitY blocked those 27 apps under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The information was shared by MoS Finance Ministry Anurag Singh Thakur in the Lok Sabha earlier this week. However, the names of the blocked loan apps weren’t shared in his reply. The information was shared by the MoS in response to a question on whether the government, large technology companies, and regulated digital lenders are jointly looking for a crackdown on fraud Chinese lending apps operating in India.

The Reserve Bank of India in a circular dated June 24, 2020, reiterated to banks and NBFCs to disclose names of digital lending platforms engaged as agents on the website while lending platforms were required to disclose upfront the name of the lending institution on whose behalf they are lending. Further, a press release was also issued on December 23, 2020, cautioning people against unauthorised digital lending platforms with an appeal to verify the antecedents of the service provider. The central bank had also constituted a Working Group on January 13, 2021, to study all aspects of digital lending activities including lending through online platforms and mobile apps by RBI regulated and unregulated entities. The group had to also come out with recommendations pertaining to regulatory and customer protection measures.

Also read: CEA Krishnamurthy Subramanian: Mindset of always asking what govt can do for startups should change

In December 2020, Hyderabad police had arrested 11 persons from Delhi, Gurgaon while the Cyberabad police arrested six others in Hyderabad in instant mobile app loan fraud. Likewise, in January this year, Telangana police had arrested a Chinese national HE Jian alias Mark, a native of Jiangxi in China in connection with a probe into the instant online loan apps case. India’s digital lending market has seen significant growth over the years.

Moreover, from December 2020 till January 20, 2021, Google had also removed around 100 money lending apps that were “possibly not in compliance with the applicable legal and regulatory framework.” The information was shared by the Minister of State for Electronics and IT Sanjay Dhotre said in a written reply to the Lok Sabha in February. The digital lending value had jumped from $33 billion in FY15 to $150 billion in FY20 and is likely to grow to the $350-billion mark by FY23, according to Statista. Among the leading players in the market include Capital Float, Zest Money, Indifi, KredX, BharatPe, Lendingkart, Paisabazaar, and more. The digital lending value had jumped from $33 billion in FY15 to $150 billion in FY20 and is likely to grow to the $350-billion mark by FY23, according to Statista. Among the leading players in the market include Capital Float, Zest Money, Indifi, KredX, BharatPe, Lendingkart, Paisabazaar, and more.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

China crackdown cuts Big Tech down to size, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Shanghai, March 21, 2021 -Tighter regulations, billions in lost overseas share value and government pledges to get even tougher — Chinese tech giants are reeling under what looks like a sustained Big Brother assault on innovation and enterprise.

But there’s a reason why the escalating crackdown is largely drawing shrugs from Chinese consumers: it is widely seen as necessary.

Concern is rising in China over chaotic online lending and accusations of powerful platforms squeezing merchants and misusing consumer data, reflecting global unease with Big Tech that has Facebook, Google and others also facing scrutiny at home and abroad.

“With China, it immediately becomes about the Communist Party. But if the UK government were doing this, people would probably be OK with it,” said Jeffrey Towson, head of research at Asia Tech Strategy.

“These actions look quite reasonable.”

Companies such as e-commerce giants Alibaba and JD.com, along with messaging-and-gaming colossus Tencent, are among the world’s most valuable businesses, feasting on growing Chinese digital lifestyles and a government ban on major US competitors.

But they have become victims of their own success.

The troubles burst into public view last October when Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma committed the cardinal sin of publicly criticising China’s regulators for their increasingly dire warnings concerning his company’s financial arm, Ant Group.

Ant Group’s Alipay platform is ubiquitous in China, used to buy everything from meals to ride-hailing, groceries and travel tickets.

Slow-footed regulatory oversight also allowed Ant to expand into loans, wealth management, even insurance. Tencent’s fintech profile also has risen.

Consequently, they have become “overly powerful actors capable of pushing regulatory boundaries without regard for systemic risks,” Eurasia Group consultancy said in a research note.

These ambitions have collided with Beijing’s years-long campaign to purge its chaotic financial system of a dangerous debt build-up.

– Size matters – Chinese debt spiralled to 335 percent of gross domestic product by the end of 2020, according to the Institute of International Finance. Previous lower levels had already prompted International Monetary Fund concern.

The official response to Ma’s unusual outburst has been uncompromising: Ant’s record-breaking $35 billion Hong Kong-Shanghai IPO was abruptly suspended, Ma disappeared from public view for weeks, and regulatory screws have been tightened.

China is expected to force Ant and Tencent to begin running their lending operations like banks, with resulting higher scrutiny and financial liability — things the fintech leaders had largely avoided.

“They’ll have to meet capital requirements and set up financial holding companies. They can’t escape it,” said Ke Yan, lead analyst at DZT Research.

The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Alibaba was also being pushed to shed wide-ranging media assets, including a potential sale of Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post.

The tumult has sliced billions off Chinese tech firms’ share values.

In China’s crackdown, size matters.

While just over 20 percent of US retail spending takes place online, China is forecast to surpass 50 percent this year. Major Chinese platforms boast hundreds of millions of users, amplifying concerns about industry concentration and data privacy.

Ma’s unusual outburst was seen by many as a direct Big Tech challenge to Communist Party authority and influence.

But Ke says: “I don’t think (the crackdown) was triggered by Jack Ma. It’s been planned for a long time.”

Unease over tech’s growing influence is not unique to China.

“Most major governments globally are focussed on this issue in a way they weren’t two years ago. Everyone seems to think that Big Tech has gotten too powerful,” Towson said.

– ‘Very China approach’ – Such crackdowns are not unusual in China.

Its economy has transformed so rapidly in recent decades that regulators often play catch-up, eventually making headlines with clampdowns that analysts say are often necessary — though belated — attempts to address problems that appear.

“It’s a very ‘China’ approach: ‘Let it run to not stifle innovation, and we’ll step in a bit later,'” said Towson, adding that China is “rightfully concerned” over how fast fintech has grown.

Many Chinese web-users say the crackdown should have come sooner. Consumers increasingly express privacy concerns as use of facial recognition and other advanced technologies expand in China.

More measures could be coming. President Xi Jinping last week called for tightened oversight to prevent online monopolies and financial chaos.

This could “break down the walled gardens built by Alibaba and Tencent,” Eurasia Group said, leading to a “more level playing field for smaller companies and present better choices for consumers.”

Ant’s eventual IPO is expected to be severely trimmed down, but China’s moves are “unlikely (to) materially change the competitive landscape and potential growth” in such a crucial sector, investment group CLSA said in a research report.

“Regulatory risks are overstated,” it added.

It may take time for the “dust to settle”, said Ke, but he adds: “there is still huge growth behind these companies.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Post exit from PCA framework, IDBI Bank to focus on improving efficiency ratios, says MD, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Having emerged from regulatory restrictions recently, IDBI Bank is now looking at growing business in a calibrated way with more focus on profitability and in improving efficiency ratios, its Managing Director and CEO Rakesh Sharma said. On March 10, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) removed the LIC-controlled bank from its prompt corrective action (PCA) framework, which was imposed in May 2017, after it had breached certain regulatory thresholds, including capital adequacy, asset quality and profitability.

“With restrictions imposed by RBI gone, we will like to go in a calibrated way and grow the business in a more profitable fashion so that my efficiency ratios improve. Our revenue, profitability and other ratios will certainly show improvement,” Sharma told in an interaction.

He said in the fiscal 2021-22, the bank will be targeting to improve net interest margin (NIM) to 3 per cent, return of assets (ROA) at above 0.60-0.70 and cost to income ratio to below 50 per cent.

In the nine months ended December 2020, its NIM stood at 2.79 per cent and cost to income at 54 per cent.

“The depositors will now be seeing the strength of the bank. The bad phase is over and the bank is sufficiently strong,” he said.

Sharma said during the last four years, when the bank was under PCA, the focus was on retail and priority sector lending. Currently, the share of retail loans in the bank’s total advances is 60 per cent and that of corporate loans is 40 per cent.

“Going forward we will not be stopping corporate business. We will start doing corporate business and will continue to do retail business. It will be a retail-focussed bank,” he said.

During FY22, the bank is expecting around 8-10 per cent growth in mid and large corporate loan segments, and 12 per cent growth in retail and priority sector loans, he said.

Besides loan against property (LAP), the bank now wants to develop personal loans and gold loans portfolio, where it has a small exposure at present, Sharma said.

The bank doesn’t see much stress in its loan book going ahead due to the better asset quality.

“Due to Covid, we could see minor stress in accounts. But the type of assets that we have built up in our bank, I don’t foresee any problem,” Sharma said.

Overall slippages in fiscal 2020-21 and the next fiscal will be less than 2 per cent, he added.

In FY22, the bank is targeting a total recovery of Rs 3,500-4,000 crore.

Sharma said the bank is well capitalised and there is no immediate need for raising funds.

As of end-December 2020, the bank’s total capital-to-risk weighted assets ratio (CRAR) stood at 14.77 per cent.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 34 35 36 37 38 96