Canara Bank Adjusts Interest Rates On Its FDs: Check Current Rates Here

[ad_1]

Read More/Less

With effect from 8 February 2021, Canara Bank has revamped interest rates on deposits which are less than 2 crores. Interest on deposits maturing in one year has been lowered by the bank. Canara Bank has higher interest rates on FDs with tenures of 2 years to ten years. For term deposits with a maturity period of 7-45 days, Canara Bank will now deliver a 2.95 percent interest rate after the new adjustment. The bank will offer 3.9, 4 and 4.45 percent interest rates for FDs with maturity periods of 46-90 days, 91 days to 179 days and 180 days to less than 1 year, respectively. The bank has cut the interest rate by 5 basis points i.e. 5.20% interest rate on FDs which mature in one year. The bank will provide an interest rate of 5.20 percent on term deposits maturing from over one year to less than two years. The bank will offer 5.40 percent for FDs between two years and three years. The state-owned bank will now deliver a 5.50 percent interest rate for three years to ten years of tenure.

For FDs maturing in 7 days to 10 years, senior citizens can get an interest rate ranging from 2.95 percent to 6 percent after the latest update by the bank. Canara Bank offers senior citizens 50 basis points higher than regular public on deposits maturing from 180 days to 10 years. Please note here that the above listed interest rates are for the deposit amount of below Rs 2 Cr.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NHAI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The amount of fraudulent transactions from the NHAI accounts with Kotak Mahindra Bank’s Exhibition Road branch in Patna has increased to Rs 32 crore and may be more against the initial claim of Rs15 crore by Patna police, sources said.

However, Patna police officers are tight-lipped on the matter. More than a month have passed since the fraud was detected on January 2. Only four persons, including former manager of Exhibition Road branch, Sumit Kumar, have been arrested so far.

The fraudulent transactions came to light after one Shubham Kumar Gupta (28) of Jehanabad the branch on January 2 to make an RTGS transfer of Rs11.73 crore from the NHAI account to another bank account.

But the Patna police is still not clear about the total amount of fraudulent withdrawal or the time period of the fraud. When asked, Town DSP Suresh Kumar told TOI over the phone on Saturday that as per his information, the amount transacted fraudulently from the NHAI bank account is Rs28 crore.

“Bank authorities are conducting internal audit after which police will get to know the complete details. However, I have asked the bank to provide a report by Monday,” he said, adding that the bank authorities are expert of audit and not the police.

NHAI regional officer Colonel (retired) Chanda Vats told TOI that fraudulent transactions of Rs32 crore from NHAI accounts have come to light. He said Rs32 crore might only be a tip of the total amount withdrawn fraudulently and more could come to light in future.

“The bank authorities are not cooperating with us. They have not provided us reconciliation statement yet, even though we have sought it,” he said.

Vats also said the fraudulent transactions had taken place actually from two separate NHAI accounts, both with Kotak Mahindra Bank’s Exhibition Road branch. He said one account is for Mokama-Bakhtiyarpur national highways project and another is for Patna-Gaya NH project.

“These bank accounts are opened by joint signature of the project director and the district land acquisition officer (DLAO) concerned. The account is later handled by the DLAO. All disbursals to the beneficiaries concerned against their acquired land are made by the DLAO’s signature,” Vats said.

Vats said he will call the bank’s higher authorities to cooperate with NHAI and give details of all transactions or “we would write to NHAI headquarters urging not to do business with them in future”.

Patna DM Chandrashekhar Singh, when contacted, had found no discrepancies from the district administration side. “DLAO transferred from the bank account only to the beneficiaries against land acquisition,” he had said and added: “Report could be taken from NHAI. Only they can tell what has happened with the accounts.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PNB expects Rs 3,800 cr recovery from Bhushan Power resolution; sees good amount from DHFL too, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State-owned Punjab National Bank (PNB) is expecting to recover a substantial Rs 3,800 crore from Bhushan Power and Steel under debt resolution in NCLT, which will help it achieve the target of Rs 8,000 crore cash recoveries during this fiscal, its managing director and CEO S S Mallikarjuna Rao said.

Besides, the city-based lender also hopes to make good recovery of its exposure in crisis-hit DHFL, which is undergoing a resolution process currently.

Sticking to the bank’s previous guidance on restricting the gross NPAs below 14 per cent and net NPAs lower than 5 per cent by the end of the current fiscal, Rao said there has been an improvement in collection efficiency as well in January after a dampened December.

Across the banking industry, the collections were much better in October and November, before dampening again in December because of lack of clarity on NPA recognition from the Supreme Court, he added.

In response to a public interest litigation during Covid times, the Supreme Court had passed an interim order in September, directing banks not to declare accounts as NPA, which otherwise would have turned dud, during March-August till further orders.

“So there was an impulse on identification on NPA. However, the collections have again improved in the month of January across the banking industry, including our bank. Considering, these factors, we are very confident that there won’t be any further increase (of bad loans). About pro-forma NPA, we have already marked them, we have identified and have done the complete provisioning, so there won’t be any impact in Q4 (FY21),” Rao said in a conference post bank’s December quarter results.

“On the contrary, I am expecting reduction of the proforma NPA what we have declared as on December 31, 2020.”

The bank has posted a net profit of Rs 506 crore on a standalone basis in the quarter ended December 2020 of this fiscal. It had posted a net loss of Rs 492.28 crore in the year-ago period.

The lender also cut down on its gross non-performing assets (NPAs) to 12.99 per cent by the end of the December quarter from 16.30 per cent in the year-ago period. While, net NPAs reduced to 4.03 per cent from 7.18 per cent.

Rao said the recovery from smaller accounts have been better, if not very good, as there was a dampening spirit in December.

“Recoveries are better in January, it will be definitely on the expected lines up to March. Last time, I had given guidance of recovery of about Rs 8,000 crore through reduction (by way of resolution) in NCLT cases. So we will await as there are big accounts… Bhushan Power is one account where we are anticipating cash recovery of Rs 3,800 crore. And DHFL is also there where bidding (for resolution of NPA) has been completed very recently. There also we expect a good amount of recovery,” Rao said.

So these two things (Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd and DHFL) together will be able to achieve the expected target what we were anticipating in terms of NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal), he added.

In June, the chief of the country’s second largest public sector lender had said that PNB expects to make recoveries worth Rs 8,000 crore in 2020-21.

On the NPA situation, Rao said as the bank has already identified those accounts which otherwise could fall into NPA category and its bad asset numbers would have been different and has made provision accordingly, there won’t be any change in its earlier stance of restricting gross and bad loan ratios below 14 per cent and 5 per cent, respectively.

“So, our guidance is what we have given last time also. We would like to retain the net NPA below 5 per cent by March and we would like to retain the gross NPA 14 per cent… January appears to be much better in terms of collections. So I am very confident that we will be able to control the NPA,” Rao said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Early identification of stress, capitalisation augur well for banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Somasekhar Vemuri, Senior Director, CRISIL Ratings

Banks have improved the granularity of their loan books by focusing more on retail asset classes and reducing potential asset-quality shocks due to defaults by large entities. The share of medium and large industries in non-food credit of banks fell from ~40% in fiscal 2012 to ~27% in fiscal 2020, while that of personal loans rose from 18% to 28%.

While granular loans to retail borrowers and micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) can result in elevated stress during the pandemic, given the unprecedented impact on household incomes and small businesses, policy mitigations announced would limit the impact to some extent.

Rama Patel, Director, CRISIL Ratings
Rama Patel, Director, CRISIL Ratings

Crucially, measures such as moratorium on loans, relief in interest on interest, one-time debt restructuring, and emergency credit line guarantee schemes have thrown many a lifeline to businesses and households. They also helped banks, especially those with diversified portfolios, thwart significant slippages.

The other major reason for systemic resilience is capital infusion. Public sector banks (PSBs) have raised ~Rs 3.4 lakh crore of equity in the past five years, bulk of it from the government.

That has shored up systemic capital adequacy ratio to 14.7% last fiscal and further to 15.8% as of September 2020 – almost on a par with advanced economies such as the US (15.9%) and South Korea (15.3%). Private sector banks are in a better position, reflected in their capital adequacy ratio of 16.7%, compared with 13.1% for PSBs as of March 2020.

To be sure, NPAs would rise in the pandemic aftermath and necessitate high capitalisation levels.

Robust capitalisation facilitates timely recognition and quick resolution of pandemic-related stress and faster recovery of credit growth. The different trajectories of banking systems in the US and the euro area after the GFC demonstrate this. Higher recapitalisation of US banks compared with the euro area enabled faster resolution of stress and facilitated quicker recovery of credit growth after the GFC in the US.

While it is natural for credit growth to be muted during a crisis due to lower demand and risk aversion, it is important that the pace improves once uncertainty abates and demand returns.

There are two reasons for this. One, bank credit growth significantly influences the growth trajectory of a developing country like India where credit to the private non-financial sector is underpenetrated at ~58% of GDP, compared with over 150% in the US, euro area, South Korea or even China.

Two, it is an essential condition for banking system resilience. Banks need to grow and diversify their loan books to enhance profitability that, in turn, is the key to building capital buffers against future risks and growth. Profitability can be sustained only through credit growth, backed by robust risk management and appropriate pricing.

As the pandemic-related stress continues to unfold, the improved resilience of Indian banks will be tested. A continued focus on shoring up capital to withstand asset-quality pressures will pave the way for credit growth as recovery gathers pace.

Click here to read all ETBFSI blogs.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETBFSI.com does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETBFSI.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reports, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Development Finance Institution (DFI) is expected to be set up with India Infrastructure Finance Company’s (IIFCL) paid-up capital of Rs 10,000 crore and an additional provision of Rs 10,000 crore announced in the Budget 2021, reported Business Standard.

As per the draft note, the Cabinet said that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Act and the Banking Regulation Act may be amended to set up the DFI for enabling it access to a line of credit, said BS. quoting sources.

“With an initial capital infusion of Rs 20,000 crore, the government or other investors may infuse up to Rs 1 trillion in the DFI at a later stage. The government’s part will come through the supplementary demand for grants.Prior to subsuming the infrastructure company with the DFI, it will clean up its books by providing for outstanding bad loans worth Rs 4,500 crore.”

It is also expected that the entity may have a lower minimum capital adequacy ratio of 9%, compared to 12-15% for NBFCs. The draft also proposes transfer of the assets and liabilities of IIFCL to National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development (NaBFID).

Post the transfer, IIFCL shall fully provide for all its outstanding bad assets, so that the new institution will have a clean book. It also said any additional requirement of money will be given through demand for grants subsequently, said BS.

Banks have been facing the challenge of an asset-liability mismatch in funding infrastructure projects or other projects with a long gestation period, and this gave the rise to the idea of setting up of a DFI, which will include access to low-cost funds from a priority-sector shortfall and greater headroom for borrowing, compared to other NBFCs.

Currently, there are some financial institutions — Indian Railway Finance Corporation, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, and the Small Industries Development Bank of India — are working like the DFI.

Meanwhile, the proposal is likely to get a nod from the Cabinet soon.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less



(Amount in ₹ crore, Rate in Per cent)

  Volume
(One Leg)
Weighted
Average Rate
Range
A. Overnight Segment (I+II+III+IV) 9,786.95 0.83 0.01-5.30
     I. Call Money 623.95 2.93 2.50-3.50
     II. Triparty Repo 8,918.00 0.56 0.01-3.26
     III. Market Repo 0.00  
     IV. Repo in Corporate Bond 245.00 5.30 5.30-5.30
B. Term Segment      
     I. Notice Money** 9,274.45 3.26 1.90-3.55
     II. Term Money@@ 517.00 3.05-3.75
     III. Triparty Repo 3,36,687.55 3.19 1.50-3.35
     IV. Market Repo 94,598.58 3.10 0.01-3.35
     V. Repo in Corporate Bond 0.00
  Auction Date Tenor (Days) Maturity Date Amount Current Rate /
Cut off Rate
C. Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF) & Marginal Standing Facility (MSF)
I. Today’s Operations
1. Fixed Rate          
     (i) Repo          
     (ii) Reverse Repo Fri, 05/02/2021 3 Mon, 08/02/2021 5,25,264.00 3.35
2. Variable Rate&          
  (I) Main Operation          
     (a) Reverse Repo          
  (II) Fine Tuning Operations          
     (a) Repo          
     (b) Reverse Repo
3. MSF Fri, 05/02/2021 3 Mon, 08/02/2021 6.00 4.25
4. Long-Term Repo Operations    
5. Targeted Long Term Repo Operations
6. Targeted Long Term Repo Operations 2.0
7. Net liquidity injected from today’s operations
[injection (+)/absorption (-)]*
      -5,25,258.00  
II. Outstanding Operations
1. Fixed Rate          
     (i) Repo          
     (ii) Reverse Repo          
2. Variable Rate&          
  (I) Main Operation          
     (a) Reverse Repo Fri, 29/01/2021 14 Fri, 12/02/2021 2,00,007.00 3.54
  (II) Fine Tuning Operations          
     (a) Repo          
     (b) Reverse Repo          
3. MSF          
4. Long-Term Repo Operations# Mon, 24/02/2020 365 Tue, 23/02/2021 15.00 5.15
  Mon, 17/02/2020 1095 Thu, 16/02/2023 499.00 5.15
  Mon, 02/03/2020 1094 Wed, 01/03/2023 253.00 5.15
  Mon, 09/03/2020 1093 Tue, 07/03/2023 484.00 5.15
  Wed, 18/03/2020 1094 Fri, 17/03/2023 294.00 5.15
5. Targeted Long Term Repo Operations^ Fri, 27/03/2020 1092 Fri, 24/03/2023 12,236.00 4.40
  Fri, 03/04/2020 1095 Mon, 03/04/2023 16,925.00 4.40
  Thu, 09/04/2020 1093 Fri, 07/04/2023 18,042.00 4.40
  Fri, 17/04/2020 1091 Thu, 13/04/2023 20,399.00 4.40
6. Targeted Long Term Repo Operations 2.0^ Thu, 23/04/2020 1093 Fri, 21/04/2023 7,950.00 4.40
D. Standing Liquidity Facility (SLF) Availed from RBI$       29,770.06  
E. Net liquidity injected from outstanding operations [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*     -93,139.94  
F. Net liquidity injected (outstanding including today’s operations) [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*     -6,18,397.94  
G. Cash Reserves Position of Scheduled Commercial Banks
     (i) Cash balances with RBI as on 05/02/2021 4,83,344.71  
     (ii) Average daily cash reserve requirement for the fortnight ending 12/02/2021 4,44,286.00  
H. Government of India Surplus Cash Balance Reckoned for Auction as on¥ 05/02/2021 0.00  
I. Net durable liquidity [surplus (+)/deficit (-)] as on 15/01/2021 8,08,585.00  
@ Based on Reserve Bank of India (RBI) / Clearing Corporation of India Limited (CCIL).
– Not Applicable / No Transaction.
** Relates to uncollateralized transactions of 2 to 14 days tenor.
@@ Relates to uncollateralized transactions of 15 days to one year tenor.
$ Includes refinance facilities extended by RBI.
& As per the Press Release No. 2019-2020/1900 dated February 06, 2020.
* Net liquidity is calculated as Repo+MSF+SLF-Reverse Repo.
# As per the Press Release No. 2020-2021/287 dated September 04, 2020.
^ As per the Press Release No. 2020-2021/605 dated November 06, 2020.
¥ As per the Press Release No. 2014-2015/1971 dated March 19, 2015.
Ajit Prasad
Director   
Press Release : 2020-2021/1064

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India, in exercise of powers vested in it under sub-section (1) of Section 35A read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, hereby directs that the Directive dated August 28, 2015 issued to The Vaish Co-operative Commercial Bank Ltd., New Delhi, as modified from time to time, the validity of which was last extended up to February 08, 2021 shall continue to apply to the bank for a further period of three months from February 09, 2021 to May 08, 2021 subject to review.

(Yogesh Dayal)     
Chief General Manager

Press Release: 2020-2021/1063

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been conducting Financial Literacy Week (FLW) every year since 2016 to propagate financial education messages on a particular theme across the country.

2. The theme selected for current year FLW is “Credit Discipline and Credit from Formal Institutions” which will be observed from February 8-12, 2021. This theme is one of the strategic objectives of the National Strategy for Financial Education 2020-2025. Focus will be on a) responsible borrowing; b) borrowing from formal institutions and c) timely repayments.

3. Banks have been advised to disseminate the information and create awareness among its customers and general public. Further, RBI will undertake a centralized mass media campaign during the month of February 2021 to broadcast essential financial awareness messages to general public.

(Yogesh Dayal)     
Chief General Manager

Press Release: 2020-2021/1062

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PNB convenes EGM to elect a 2nd shareholder director to its Board

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Punjab National Bank (PNB), the country’s second largest public sector bank, has convened an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on March 17 to elect ‘one shareholder director’. This will be a virtual meeting of shareholders.

This move is significant as the bank is now looking to rope in its second shareholder director on the strength of a recent Finance Ministry decision empowering Public Sector Banks ( PSB) boards to act on the decisions that remained held up at various board-level committees due to lack of quorum arising from vacancies or recusal by existing directors.

A shareholder director is one who is elected from among shareholders other than central government. A public sector bank has two main categories of shareholders— central government and ‘other shareholders’ (public shareholders). In India, all the public sector banks are listed entities although none of them are registered as companies under the Companies Act. There are separate legislations that govern the Board composition of such PSBs.

 

The elected shareholder director is finally appointed by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC) of the bank Board concerned. PNB currently does not have the requisite NRC strength and is therefore looking to get another shareholder director through Board approval route after election of such a director by the shareholders of the bank at an EGM.

PNB has moved to get another shareholder director after its recent nearly ₹3,788 crore qualified institutional placement (QIP), which saw the centre’s shareholding in the bank drop from 85.59 per cent to 76.87 per cent. With the Centre’s shareholding coming down, PNB became technically eligible to have two shareholder directors.

Having an additional shareholder director on a Board is useful for Banks like PNB as all shareholder directors are counted as independent directors for the purpose of compliance with SEBI regulations for listed entities.

In Boards of public sector banks, there are executive directors appointed by central government, there is government nominee director (official of central government), there is a RBI nominee director, two employee directors ( representing workmen and officers) and other directors (shareholder directors).

This will be the second shareholder director for PNB besides Asha Bhandarker, who was elected on September 12,2018 for a period of three years.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Why is it so annoying to send money abroad?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


If you’ve ever spent significant time abroad, or tried supporting family overseas, you know that the process of sending money internationally can be stressful. It costs time and money — often too much of both. There’s hope that global crypto currencies will make this process easier, but until those become more accepted, you’ll have to find other ways to save.

I remember returning to New Delhi after a semester at Yale University in Connecticut some years back and trying to move what I had in U.S. dollars to my bank account in India. The process of remitting these savings was so clunky – involving applications in banks in both countries — that I just used my U.S. debit card until the account ran dry. I’m sure I paid a bunch of fees and got short-changed on currency conversion costs, but I found it easier to spend this money rather than spending time trying to find a cheaper way.

Although the costs of remitting have fallen in recent years, they’re still above the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal of 3% per transaction by 2030. A world bank study shows that the overall average costs of transmission were 6.5% in 2020, with sending money digitally costing slightly less and sending via bank transfer slightly more.

That means for every $100 you want to remit abroad, you really only send around $93 on average. This varies depending on how you move your money and by where you’re sending money to and from. For example, remitting from a Group of Twenty (G20) country will on average cost just more than 3% if it’s going to India, but more than 6% if it’s going to South Africa. When money is sent within Sub-Saharan Africa, fees can into as much as 20% of the amount.

That’s a heavy cost for what should be a simple transaction. According to the World Bank, global citizens sent and received more than $650 billion in personal remittances in 2019. That means we lost around $45 billion to costs alone.

Fortunately, there are a few things you can do to lower your own costs when trundling money around the world. But keep in mind that exact costs will depend on where you are and where you’re remitting to.

First, it helps to know that there are two main components of the cost in sending money abroad: the fees of the bank or transmitting entity you use, and the foreign exchange margin they make when they buy at the lower end of the currency exchange rate and sell at the higher end. You should check both before you move any money. You’re getting a good deal if your total cost — fees plus the currency exchange margin — is lower than 5% of the transaction amount. If you’re being offered 8% of the amount, that’s generally too much.

You should also consider where you go. There are four entities that will do the job: banks, credit and debit cards, traditional money transfer firms and fintechs. No surprises here that the banks and cash transfers cost the most and fintech firms the least.

If the country you’re remitting to allows for exchanging mobile money through e-wallets, then that’s likely to be the cheapest way to send and receive money. Find a licensed, regulated entity that works between the geographies you want to move money between, and check if the total cost is less than 5%. But keep in mind that certain places don’t have wallets that work with each other, and that there may be country specific rules around the movement of money.

Cost isn’t the only consideration either. Perhaps it’s worth paying the higher bank transfer fees because you get the greatest sense of security from going through that institution. It usually helps to find others you who have made similar payments and see what worked best for them.

Of course, what you decide to use will ultimately depend on your goals. Are you trying to set up a child who’s just moved abroad? If so, going through a bank is still your best bet. And you’ll want to make sure they have at least two months of rent, food and other expenses in cash since setting up cross-border bank accounts takes time.

Are you sending money back to your family on a regular basis? Then you’ll want a cheaper fintech solution if possible, otherwise a bank will remain your friend. If you’re just traveling for a short period (once we’re traveling again), you can simply use your debit or credit cards to get access to your own money — check with your card company, though, about any foreign transaction fees — or you can use mobile money in the form of e-wallets.

No, these solutions aren’t perfect, and yes, the remittance system remains a headache. We can only hope that as crypto currencies gain acceptance, moving money across countries will become as fast, easy and cheap as moving money within them.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 67 68 69 70 71 92