Axis Bank, promoter United India Insurance settle non-disclosure case with Sebi, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Axis Bank has paid Rs 41.4 lakh to Sebi to settle its case of non-disclosure of information relating to offloading of the bank’s shares by its promoter United India Insurance Company(UIIC).

The non-life insurer also paid Rs 10.1 lakh to the regulator to settle the same case.

Sebi said it noted in the investigation that during the period from October 01, 2017 to September 30, 2018, the value of trades by UICC in the securities of the private lender on each trading day was more than Rs 10 lakh.

Under Sebi rules, Axis Bank was required to disclose the same to the stock exchange within two trading days of the receipt of the disclosure from UIIC.

“However, the same was disclosed by the applicant (Axis Bank) to the stock exchange only on October 16, 2020, only with a delay of 1072 – 1080 days,” Sebi said in its order on Tuesday.

The regulator said in five instances the disclosures made by UIIC to Axis Bank was with a delay of 10-17 days. It was required to disclose the same within two working days.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ED attaches over Rs 17-cr assets of Amnesty International India on money laundering charges, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Enforcement Directorate on Tuesday said it has attached over Rs 17 crore bank deposits in connection with its money laundering case against two entities of Amnesty International (India), the global human rights watchdog. The agency said in a statement that a provisional order has been issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) “attaching bank accounts of Amnesty International India Pvt Ltd (AIIPL) and Indians for Amnesty International Trust (IAIT)”.

It said “both the entities have acquired the proceeds of crime and layered the same in the form of various movable properties. The order involves attachment of movable properties worth of Rs 17.66 crore being proceeds of crime”.

This money laundering case of the ED is based on a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) FIR filed against AIIPL, IAIT, Amnesty International India Foundation Trust (AIIFT) and Amnesty International South Asia Foundation (AISAF) that was filed under various sections of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) and the Indian Penal Code (120-B which denotes criminal conspiracy).

“Amnesty International India Foundation Trust (AIIFT) had been granted permission under the FCRA during 2011-12 for receiving foreign contribution from the Amnesty International UK,” it said.

However, the statement said the same was cancelled on the basis of the “adverse” inputs received.

“Since permission/registration has been denied to the said entity on the basis of adverse inputs received from security agencies during the year 2011-12, AIIPL and IAIT were formed in the year 2013-14 and 2012-13, respectively to escape the FCRA route and carried out NGO activities in the guise of service export and FDI,” the agency alleged.

A probe found, the ED said, that upon cancellation of the FCRA licence by the Union government, Amnesty International India Foundation Trust and Amnesty entities adopted “new method” to receive money from abroad.

The agency said Amnesty International, UK sent Rs 51.72 crore to AIIPL in the guise of export of services and the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).

“For export proceeds/advances to Amnesty International UK there was no documentary proof, such as invoices and copies of agreement between AIIPL and Amnesty International UK, has been furnished by AIIPL to the authorised dealer (AD) banks.”

“It is prima facie found that Amnesty International India Pvt Ltd and others have obtained foreign remittances to the tune of Rs 51.72 crore in the guise export of services and the FDI from Amnesty International (UK) whose source is the donations from individual donors,” the ED alleged.

The agency has earlier attached some properties in this case and the total attachment value now stands at Rs 19.54 crore.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks’ bad loan provisioning falls for fourth consecutive quarter in Q3, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


ET Intelligence Group: The aggregate bad loan provisioning by banks fell sequentially for the fourth consecutive quarter in December though some of them increased COVID related provisioning. For a sample of 28 banks, provisioning for bad loans or nonperforming assets (NPA) fell by 27.5% sequentially to Rs 24,149.7 crore in the December quarter. It was the lowest in the seven quarters under observation.

The loan loss provisioning by banks has been benign in the current fiscal year so far on account of various schemes launched by the central bank to reduce the impact of the pandemic. “Bank NPAs this year would tend to be a bit nebulous given the various forbearance dispensations that have been made besides the restructuring schemes that have been introduced,” noted CARE Ratings in a report.

A majority of the sample banks, 19 to be precise, reported lower NPA provisioning compared with the previous quarter. Among them were public sector banks (PSBs) including State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB), Union Bank, Indian Bank and Canara Bank and their private sector counterparts such as HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, and IndusInd Bank. These banks recorded a double digit sequential drop in NPA provisions for the December quarter. Banks including Kotak Bank, Axis Bank, and Yes Bank showed a sequential jump in bad loan provisioning.

The sample’s COVID-19 provisioning increased by 22.7% sequentially to Rs 14,291.1 crore in the December quarter led by a higher provisioning by SBI, HDFC Bank, and ICICI Bank. The sample’s net interest income fell marginally by 1.4% to Rs 1.3 lakh crore.

According to the CARE Ratings report, the gross NPAs of the banking system fell to Rs 7.4 lakh crore in the December quarter from Rs 7.9 lakh crore in the previous quarter while the NPA ratio fell to 7% from 7.7% by similar comparison.

Banks’ bad loan provisioning falls for fourth consecutive quarter in Q3
The banking, finance and insurance (BFSI) sector reported a gradual recovery in credit offtake amid buoyant festive demand in the December quarter. “The BFSI sector saw robust operational delivery, especially in the large-cap banks, with above 70% provisioning coverage ratio and minimal restructuring in the loan books,” said Gautam Duggad, rresearch head, Motilal Oswal Institutional Equities.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

A ‘Sell’ Rating Is Given To This Private Sector Lender

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Investment

oi-Roshni Agarwal

|

Yes Bank

is showing continued stress in its book with new loan stress at 17% as per brokerage firm Elara Capital. Also outstanding stress stands at 39 percent.

On the operations front, while profitability saw a surge quarter on quarter by 16 percent, on a yearly basis there has been seen a decline of 101% in net profit in the review period ending December 2020.

A ‘Sell' Rating Is Given To This Private Sector Lender

A ‘Sell’ Rating Is Given To This Private Sector Lender

Also asset quality continued to show stress with sharp deterioration in the review period.

Stress from new loans that included standstill NPL, SMA1, SMA2 together with restructured loans were high at Rs. 282 billion or 17 percent of total loans in the December ended quarter as against just 5% in Q2 period of the ongoing fiscal year. Reported GNPLs of Yes Bank stood at 15% vs 17% QoQ. Total outstanding stress loans rose sharply to 39% from 29% QoQ with proforma GNPLs rising from 18% to 20% and standard stress loans rising from 11% to 19%.

Growth seen in deposit on a QoQ basis

There was seen growth in both deposits and CASA on a QoQ basis but there was decline on a yearly basis at 12% and 29%, respectively. Disbursal of loans to the MSME and retail segment topped Rs. 120 billion as against the targeted levels of Rs. 100 billion. Also, credit cost saw a surge on increasing stress in the bank’s assets portfolio.

Elara Capital Recommends Sell Rating On Yes Bank

On continuing stress in its loan book and as there continues to be a spike in its asset portfolio as was seen by the brokerage for the H2Fy21, the brokerage has given a Sell call on the counter with a target price of Rs. 6 per share. Last, the scrip closed at a price of Rs. 16.05 per share on the NSE. In the December ended quarter, mutual funds have also reduced their shareholding in the counter.

GoodReturns.in



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

A ‘Sell’ Rating Is Given To This Private Sector Lender

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Investment

oi-Roshni Agarwal

|

Yes Bank

is showing continued stress in its book with new loan stress at 17% as per brokerage firm Elara Capital. Also outstanding stress stands at 39 percent.

On the operations front, while profitability saw a surge quarter on quarter by 16 percent, on a yearly basis there has been seen a decline of 101% in net profit in the review period ending December 2020.

A ‘Sell' Rating Is Given To This Private Sector Lender

A ‘Sell’ Rating Is Given To This Private Sector Lender

Also asset quality continued to show stress with sharp deterioration in the review period.

Stress from new loans that included standstill NPL, SMA1, SMA2 together with restructured loans were high at Rs. 282 billion or 17 percent of total loans in the December ended quarter as against just 5% in Q2 period of the ongoing fiscal year. Reported GNPLs of Yes Bank stood at 15% vs 17% QoQ. Total outstanding stress loans rose sharply to 39% from 29% QoQ with proforma GNPLs rising from 18% to 20% and standard stress loans rising from 11% to 19%.

Growth seen in deposit on a QoQ basis

There was seen growth in both deposits and CASA on a QoQ basis but there was decline on a yearly basis at 12% and 29%, respectively. Disbursal of loans to the MSME and retail segment topped Rs. 120 billion as against the targeted levels of Rs. 100 billion. Also, credit cost saw a surge on increasing stress in the bank’s assets portfolio.

Elara Capital Recommends Sell Rating On Yes Bank

On continuing stress in its loan book and as there continues to be a spike in its asset portfolio as was seen by the brokerage for the H2Fy21, the brokerage has given a Sell call on the counter with a target price of Rs. 6 per share. Last, the scrip closed at a price of Rs. 16.05 per share on the NSE. In the December ended quarter, mutual funds have also reduced their shareholding in the counter.

GoodReturns.in



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ICICI Bank to buy stakes in two fintech companies for Rs 6.03 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


ICICI Bank on Tuesday said it will buy stakes in two fintech companies — CityCash and Thillais Analytical Solutions — for a total cash consideration of Rs 6.03 crore.

CityCash is a bus transit-focused payments technology company which provides ticketing system technology to state transport corporations.

Thillais Analytical Solutions operates a neo-banking platform Vanghee, which facilitates connected banking solutions for corporates and MSMEs, and helps banks deepen their customer relationships.

As per two separate deals entered by the bank on Tuesday, ICICI Bank will buy 5.40 per cent stake in CityCash for Rs 4.93 crore (Rs 49.34 million) and 9.65 per cent in Thillais Analytical Solutions Pvt Ltd for Rs 1.1 crore (Rs 11 million).

Both the deals are expected to be completed by the end of March 2021, ICICI Bank said in separate filings to stock exchanges.

Post investment, ICICI Bank will hold 5.40 per cent shareholding in Tap Smart Data Information Services Pvt Ltd (CityCash) through acquisition of 5,492 equity shares. The 9.65 per cent stake in Thillais Analytical Solutions will be through acquisition of 10 equity shares and 100 CCPS (Compulsory Convertible Preference Shares).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Budget plan to privatise two PSBs: Centre may have to tweak the ‘nationalisation’ laws

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Centre may have to amend at least two banking laws to take forward its Budget announcement of privatisation of two public sector lenders.

While the Centre is yet to decide on the two public sector banks it will privatise in 2021-22, multiple sources said it is clear that the government will have to bring changes to what are popularly known as bank nationalisation laws — the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980.

Although the Finance Minister had said the legislative changes will happen in the ongoing Budget session itself, indications are that the amendments will be brought only in the monsoon session of Parliament given the crowded legislative agenda for the second part of the Budget session beginning March 8 and ending on April 8.

It may be recalled that Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had in her recent Budget speech said: “Other than IDBI Bank, we propose to take up the privatisation of two public sector banks and one general insurance company in the year 2021-22.”

Financial Services Secretary Debasish Panda had recently said that any of the 12 public sector banks could qualify for privatisation. He had said the names would be decided based on a three-committee-level process involving the NITI Aayog, the Core Group of Secretaries and the alternative mechanism for final approval.

Panda expressed confidence that banks that are now under the RBI’s prompt corrective action (PCA) framework would come out of it by March and be considered for privatisation.

‘Nil info’ on banks to be privatised

Meanwhile, the NITI Aayog, in a response (seen by BusinessLine) to a Right to Information (RTI) request (made on February 2), said (on February 15) that it had “nil information” on the banks that are to be privatised per the Budget proposal. Also, the government think-tank made it clear that its recommendations on Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) do not include any public sector bank. This was in response to a query on what the recommendations of the NITI Aayog are for privatisation of public sector banks and which two banks have been recommended for privatisation.

To another question, the NITI Aayog made it clear that the Cabinet has not yet approved any specific policy on privatisation of public sector banks. Any policy matter with respect to public sector banks is dealt by the Department of Financial Services, it said.

In her recent Budget speech, the Finance Minister had said that she was asking the NITI Aayog to work out the next list of central public sector entities that would be taken up for strategic disinvestment.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NBFC stressed assets may hit Rs 1.5-1.8 lakh crore by fiscal-end, says Crisil

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Nevertheless, gold loans and home loans have been resilient, with the least impact among segments.

By the end of the current financial year, rating agency Crisil expects stressed assets of non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) to touch Rs 1.5-1.8 lakh crore or 6-7.5% of the assets under management (AUM). However, reported gross non-performing assets would be limited due to the one-time Covid-19 restructuring window and the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) recast scheme offered by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Unlike previous crises, the pandemic has impacted almost all NBFC asset segments.

Operations of most of these lenders were curbed the most in the April-June quarter, when disbursements and collections were severely affected by the complete standstill in economic activity. Krishnan Sitaraman-senior director, Crisil Ratings, said, “This fiscal has bought unprecedented challenges to the fore for NBFCs. Collection efficiencies, after deteriorating sharply, have now improved, but are still not at pre-pandemic levels.” There is a marked increase in overdue amounts across certain segments and players, he added. Nevertheless, gold loans and home loans have been resilient, with the least impact among segments.

The past experience of handling asset quality will come to the rescue of NBFCs. For instance, many NBFCs have reoriented their collection infrastructure and are using technology more centrally, which has improved their collection efficiencies. Since the lockdown was lifted in phases, collection efficiency has improved, but is still some distance away from pre-pandemic levels in the MSME, unsecured and wholesale segments, given the volatility in underlying borrower cash flows. Stressed assets in the unsecured loans can be in the range of 9.5 to 10% by the end of FY21. Similarly, stressed assets in the real estate finance can shoot up to 15-20% by March end.

The big challenge this year will be the unsecured personal loans segment, where underlying stress has increased significantly with early-bucket delinquencies more than doubling for many NBFCs. For vehicle finance, however, Crisil expects the impact to be transitory, and collection efficiencies to continue improving over the next few quarters as economic activity improves. Unlike previous crises, the current challenges on account of Covid-19 impacted almost all NBFC asset segments. However, the restructuring schemes offered by the RBI will limit the reported gross non-performing assets (GNPAs), Crisil said.

Rahul Malik-associate director, Crisil Ratings, said, “How NBFCs approach restructuring will differ by asset class and segment.” While the traditional ones such as home loans have seen sub-1% restructuring, for unsecured loans it is substantially higher at 6-8% on an average, and for vehicle loans it is 3-5%, he added.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NPA Watch: Banks wrote off loans worth over Rs 25,500 crore in Q3

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State Bank of India (SBI) wrote off loans worth Rs 9,986 crore during Q3FY21.

A clutch of banks have together written off loans worth Rs 25,539 crore in the December quarter, even as an interim judicial stay on the recognition of bad loans after August 31 kept slippages in check. Data for 18 banks compiled by FE showed that write-offs remain a key tool for banks to reduce the amount of non-performing assets (NPAs) on their books at a time when the process and timelines for settlement and recovery have become elongated.

Banks typically make two categories of write-offs. A technical write-off is made when the bank removes an account from the NPA category even as it continues to make efforts to recover the amount involved. The other kind is when the bank takes the loan off its books altogether while providing fully for it.

The amount above includes both categories of write-offs for the 18 banks, with the exception of Punjab National Bank (PNB), where the value of technical write-offs could not be ascertained.

State Bank of India (SBI) wrote off loans worth Rs 9,986 crore during Q3FY21. Chairman Dinesh Khara said there were also other methods the bank has been using to reduce its stock of bad loans. “We are encouraging people to enter into compromises also. Options are available even outside IBC. We are exploiting all those options,” he said.

Wherever opportunity exists, the bank is trying to promote mergers and acquisition (M&A) activity as well. So we are trying out all possible ways to see that our stressed book should get resolved,” he added.

Union Bank of India made total write-offs worth Rs 5,850 crore for the quarter. Rajkiran Rai G, MD and CEO, Union Bank, told analysts the write-offs were largely technical in nature. The bank expects a recovery of about Rs 5,000 crore from written-off accounts in FY22. “We have not encashed much during this period because of Covid. So we could not go aggressive. Even in the resolutions or one-time settlements what we have done, we could not get the recoveries,” Rai said, adding, “So now maybe in the last quarter we will see some recoveries and maybe next year will be a good year on this, given the one-time settlements we have sanctioned.”

Axis Bank, which made write-offs to the tune of Rs 4,242 crore, said it has a rule-based policy for writing off loans, which was followed during Q3 as well. Chief financial officer Puneet Sharma said, “There is limited to no judgment involved in our write-off stance…the write-offs in the current quarter based on the rule engine is predominantly coming from the wholesale book.”

Banks provide for an account based on the amount of time an asset has stayed delinquent. There are categories defined by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for this — substandard (an account which stayed in the NPA category for up to 12 months), doubtful (if it has remained NPA for two years) and loss asset (one where loss has been identified by the bank or internal or external auditors or the RBI inspection but the amount has not been written off wholly).

Banks typically write off a loan when it has been fully provided for, which must happen when the loan has remained in the doubtful category for more than three years (or NPA for four years). Generally, it is a doubtful asset that gets written off and in order to do that, the bank must have made 100% provisions. The loan goes off the book altogether and ceases to get reflected in the NPA pile. The banks continue to make recovery efforts and whatever recovery is made flows into the ‘other income’ segment. Most often, this takes the form of a provision writeback.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Bank completes core banking integration

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Customers of erstwhile Allahabad Bank have been migrated to IndOASIS , the mobile banking App of Indian Bank, and they can avail mobile banking services with their existing credentials.

Chennai-based public sector lender Indian Bank on Tuesday announced the successful integration of its consolidated core banking solution (CBS) platform, following the merger of Allahabad Bank into Indian Bank, effective April 1, 2020.

The CBS and all channels were made available for use by branches and customers on February 15. The integrated CBS is running smoothly across branches and channels. Indian Bank in a statement said that this was a ‘big bang’ merger by the CBS provider, TCS where the data of 3000 plus branches and all channels of erstwhile Allahabad Bank were migrated seamlessly to the Indian Bank database. The customer account numbers of both the banks remain unchanged and the login credentials of internet banking and mobile banking were also retained.

Customers of erstwhile Allahabad Bank have been migrated to IndOASIS, the mobile banking App of Indian Bank, and they can avail mobile banking services with their existing credentials.

Padmaja Chunduru, MD & CEO, Indian Bank, said :“This was the final step in our amalgamation journey ‘Project Sangam’… The support and cooperation from TCS (technology partner) and Deloitte (merger consultant) and the way they worked shoulder to shoulder with our team made this possible.”

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 37 38 39 40 41 92