Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India, Jammu invites two-part e-tender for Disposal of shredded currency notes briquettes.

The last date for submission of the e-tender is March 02, 2021 till 11:00 AM.

For further details, please visit “Tenders” section on RBI Website (www.rbi.org.in) and for uploading the tender, please visit and register on the MSTC website at www.mstcecommerce.com.

Any addition/deletion/modification and correspondence related to the tender will be posted on the Bank’s website.

Regional Director

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Short sellers face end of an era as rookies rule Wall Street, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The latest assault on Wall Street short sellers has a long tradition, dating back to, well, at least Napoleon. “Treasonous,” he called them for betting against government securities.

They survived that and numerous other attacks over the next several centuries. But the GameStop uprising could mark the end of an era for the public short — the long-vilified folks who try to root out corporate wrongdoing, take positions betting a stock will fall and then wage public campaigns.

The biggest casualty came Friday, when Andrew Left’s Citron Research said it will discontinue offering short-selling analysis after 20 years of providing the service. Others are already adopting less-aggressive tactics or evolving into different forms and shapes altogether. Melvin Capital was forced to retreat by dumping its short position on GameStop, Carson Block and others have cut bets, and some of the mightiest hedge funds are nursing double-digit losses and exploring their next steps.

Few on Main Street or in corporate America, who see short sellers as detestable vultures with dubious practices, are shedding many tears, of course. Yet some investors, who say shorts serve to police the markets, might be. Time and again, short sellers, who practice the risky art of selling borrowed stocks to buy them back at lower prices, have been seen as a critical antidote to sniff out fraudulent companies, those with questionable accounting and business plans, or just to keep valuations under check. Enron is the most notable example.

“I’m still in business, so nowadays I think that’s well enough,” said Fahmi Quadir, a short seller best known for her successful bet against Valeant Pharmaceuticals and founder of New York hedge fund Safkhet Capital. The more fundamental problem, she said, is that fewer and fewer firms are spending substantial money to research companies or, in her case, “identify businesses that are predatory or fraudulent.”

Even before the attack from Reddit’s wallstreetbets forum, where a 6-million strong mob has joined forces to fire up stocks most hated by hedge fund elites, short selling was hard enough. A vast majority of shorts were already irrelevant, thanks to the popularity of index funds and the longest-running bull market in history.

Their numbers have been dwindling for some time. Of the thousands of hedge funds in the $3.6 trillion industry, only about 120 specialize in mostly betting against stocks. And they have seen combined assets sliced by more than half to just $9.6 billion over the past two years alone, according to data compiled by Eurekahedge.

“It is like watching the police doing a bank raid,” Crispin Odey, one of the world’s most bearish hedge fund managers, said of the trend. “There were already fewer short positions in the market before the Reddit mob began their attack than we have seen for 15 years.”

Some of the most-feared short sellers are ducking for cover. Block, whose forensic research notes have sparked precipitous declines in a number of companies, has “massively” cut his short bets. A $1.5 billion London-based hedge fund with one of the best records of short selling declined to be even named in this story on fears of being hunted down by the retail investors. Another has assigned a staffer to scour the wallstreetbets page for signs of brewing revolts as it reassesses its bets.

Short seller Gabriel Grego, founder of Quintessential Capital Management, said he is pausing bearish wagers in the U.S. While he thinks “short-selling is alive and kicking,” he said it’s time for caution. The GameStop rebellion shows that retail investors are now conscious of their power and that won’t disappear, he added.

Hated But Necessary
Shorts have faced such sieges time and again in their more than four centuries of existence. The first such trade is said to have occurred in 1609, when Flemish merchant Isaac Le Maire attempted to short Dutch East India Company’s shares. A year later, the company convinced the Dutch government to outlaw short-selling, saying the likes of Le Maire were harming innocent stockholders, including “widows and orphans.”

Napoleon banned the practice 200 years later and during Wall Street’s crash of 1929, short-seller Ben Smith hired bodyguards because of threats from angry investors. When the financial crisis intensified in 2008, U.S. regulators restricted short selling of financial stocks. Many other countries followed. More recently, billionaire Elon Musk has taken to social media lambasting short sells, calling them a scam.

But in the more favorable view, shorts are seen as the ultimate cop on Wall Street, devoting countless hours of detective and forensic work, taking on mighty companies and regulators and exposing themselves to potentially unlimited losses. Supporters say that in a world where the traditional stock research industry has lacked the spine to put sell recommendations on struggling companies and as passive investing plays an even bigger role, the descendants of Le Maire are badly needed.

Take for example Enron’s accounting scandal. Jim Chanos, the founder of hedge fund Kynikos Associates, helped expose the fraud and rode its decline from an average $79.14 per share in 2000 through December 2001, when it collapsed to 60 cents. And as recently as last year, German regulators praised short sellers after initially banning them for exposing Wirecard AG, which filed for insolvency proceedings after revealing that 1.9 billion euros ($2.3 billion) of cash was missing.

New Rule Book
Other observers are less sympathetic. Before the financial crisis in 2008, U.S. regulators modified certain rules to make shorting easier, according to Brian Barish, chief investment officer of Cambiar Investors. Some hedge funds used that as a tool to brutalize companies that were viable but in need of capital. Insolvencies that were preventable followed and real people got hurt, Barish said.

“I don’t think hedge fund books need any help,” Barish said. “Let them taste their own medicine.”

For now, hedge funds that tactically put on leveraged bets against companies for short-term profits face the biggest risk to their survival. They are expected to be selective, avoid crowded trades, borrow less and stay away from companies with heavy retail investor participation. Most importantly, they may retreat if required.

Peter Borish, chief strategist at Quad Group, predicts lower returns for such funds as they shy away from outright shorting of lower-priced stocks and take profits more quickly. “If you’re looking for a short-seller to hit home runs, you’re more likely to get singles and doubles,” he said of the new outlook.

Other funds may opt for using discrete over-the-counter put options to place short bets, since they don’t need to be disclosed in regulatory filings. Melvin Capital’s shorts being listed in their public filings helped make them a Reddit bro target.

Many still believe that ethical short-selling, or going after criminal companies, will survive. Retail investors may even be less motivated to revolt against a well-intentioned short that exposes a fraudulent company. They are less certain, however, about the resilience of passive short-selling, where traders bet against a stock not for criminal reasons but based on the fundamentals of a company. Melvin’s wager on GameStop, for example.
Some bears are taking the uproar mostly in stride. Jim Carruthers, who once ran Third Point’s short book and now heads Sophos Capital Management, is reported to be winding down some positions, but he’s not all that bothered.

“We believe this speculative fervor that has turned the stock market into a casino of late will eventually hit a wall, as all bubbles do, and will provide as target-rich an opportunity set we have seen in our careers,” he said.

For now, GameStop’s saga represents an unprecedented shift in power where a cocktail of cheap money, easy commission-free trading, a bored and quarantined society and a stick-it-to-The Man sentiment among masses of retail investors prompted them to hunt down the hunters.

As Citron’s Left put it in a YouTube video announcing his departure from the short world: “Twenty years ago I started Citron with the intention of protecting the individual against Wall Street — against the frauds and the stock promotions.” Since then, he added, Citron lost its focus: “We’ve actually become the establishment.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘Strengthen digital infrastructure & reduce long-term capital gains tax’, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Millennials have been the topic of many debates. Considered to be highly adaptive, Gen-Y prefers quick and easy ways to earn for living. And now, with the budget being just around the corner, they would be reaching out to the newspapers to find out what lies in store for them.

India is the second most populated country with 34% population of millennials. This energetic population seems to always search for opportunities to have some additional income or benefits over the current Income. And the lockdown gave these creative minds ample time to think and explore options to make extra… ETBFSI reached out to some millennials to understand their expectations from Budget 2021.

Twenty-four-year-old Saniya Khan, co-founder of a startup Brand Baba said, “The budget should continue to focus on Go Vocal for Local and give funds to enhance production within the boundaries. The budget should also promote the MSMEs by extending the credit facility.”

Since the paradigm has shifted to work from home model, Khan expects that the government might come out with measures to strengthen the digital infrastructure of the country.

Some millennials are looking for booster shots that can help solve the macro issues. Vishal Bhatia (29), said, “The government should increase the capital expenditure in infrastructure development. It should consider and reduce long-term Capital Gains Tax.”

One can’t imagine life with FMGS products, consumer durables and entertainment. Rohit Wadhwa who is a senior analyst at a private sector company said, “The government should reduce GST on everyday essentials, such as personal hygiene products, fuel, groceries and staples products, the government should also consider increasing the basic exemption limit for taxpayers.”

Millennials are also expecting the budget to boost the investment decisions. “Options given by the government under Sec 80C for reducing the taxable income should increase and the lock-in period to claim tax deduction under mutual funds should decrease,” shared Radhika Thokal.

The tech-friendly generation also expects a single digital platform for making all investment decisions, from managing bank accounts, to operating demat accounts and paying taxes.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Plan bad bank to whittle down and not transfer bad loans, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bad loans which were 7.5% in September 2020 threatens to exceed 13% by September 2021 due to large scale disruption caused by COVID-19. The gravity of the situation is expected to unfold and surface once the suspension of IBC is lifted and later when loans liberally restructured or advanced to pandemic stuck companies become due for repayment .

Evidently, status -quo is not sustainable any more. The recent measures for infusion of capital in Punjab and Sindh Bank through questionable means i.e. issuance of government bonds to the bank – interest free and on -hold to maturity basis without actual cash flow and against accounting norms -is a pointer towards emerging grim situation.

Many countries world wide including US, UK, Germany have in the past successfully set up bad banks particularly post the financial crisis of 2008 ,to hold and manage bad loans till the underlying assets are restored to health and / or disposed off or liquidated .Notable amongst these is City Holdings which successfully managed bad assets worth $800 billion hived off from City Bank .The objective of the bad bank is undoubtedly laudable and experience world wide reassuring . It however needs to be subjected to the test of realism in the Indian context.

Managing bad loans is a different ball game then lending. However, without recovery of loans, the lending has no meaning. Lending activity has to be seen as a value chain in continuum till outstanding loan is recovered and if found necessary, through take over and realisation of underlying assets or businesses. The banks therefore need to create requisite capacity to manage bad loans by themselves . A bad bank in the normal course would therefore be a moral hazard incentivising banks to continue with their indiscreet lending practices.

The Indian Bankers Association justified a bad bank amongst others for the reason of lingering fear of enquiries and investigations in the minds of bank officials for the commercial decIsions taken for restoration of viability or disposal of bad loans. This argument is preposterous as the bad bank sponsored by the government, Asset Management Company (AMC) and Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) setup as a public private partnership may not either be able to escape external scrutiny for public accountability. The banks should be made to assume rather than abdicate their responsibility for managing bad loans.

As a sound management practice, banks should set up a Strategic Business Unit (SBU) as part of its core functions, designed to segregate bad loans and ring fence resultant risks on the balance sheet to focus on management of loans at SMA 2 or NPA stage. The SBU should for the purpose have commensurate autonomy, organisation structure, system and processes. Through SBU set up in 2003 as a part of Internal restructuring Dresdner Bank AG ,Germany ,was able to successfully resolve €35 billion portfolio. In case of banks with high level of NPAs ,the government can consider giving on- balance guarantee to protect the bank from loss on bad portfolios.

Pandemic has however created extraordinary situation with crippling effect on the economy in general and on solvency and liquidity of industry – across the board, in particular. It is akin to a force majeure event – not caused by actions of banks or the borrowers. The banks in order to ensure their continuing viability of operations and ability to meet financing needs of the trade and industry post pandemic need to be freed of burden of NPAs through on balance sheet or off balance sheet structures with the government support.

The Bad bank should better be set up as spin-off i.e. disposing bad loans into a legally separated entity and not as a special purpose vehicle used to off -load bad loans. On balance sheet structures though desirable may not be as efficacious given the urgency to tame and deal with the NPAs caused by the pandemic.

Further it would be advisable that government instead of setting up one monolithic bad bank , should set separate bad bank for infrastructure loans and for other loans. This would enable focused approach considering economic significance and specialised skill set required in nurturing, disposal or liquidation of underlying assets. Different bad banks can then be weaved in to a holding company structure for better governance and uniform approach, in managing bad loans. Transfer of bad loans should be at fair value for reflecting true financial health, and not at book value as mooted in some quarters. It would be imprudent to Tweak or overrule, through legal or regulatory diktat, internationally accepted accounting norms in this regard.

The government instead of setting up one monolithic bad bank , should set separate bad bank for infrastructure loans and for other loans .This would enable focused approach considering economic significance and specialised skill set required in nurturing, disposal or liquidation of underlying assets. Different bad banks can then be weaved in to a holding company structure for better governance and uniform approach.

The bad bank may offer a viable alternative structure as an extraordinary and onetime measure .It should however be confined to bad loans caused by pandemic the principle followed for granting moratorium for repayment of loans or suspension of IBC post pandemic.

Care should also be taken that the bad bank does not become a mere instrument of transfer of bad loan from one balance sheet to another. Learning from international experience the bad bank need to be fully autonomous, professionally managed and have systems and processes which facilitate initiatives and outcome oriented actions in a fair and transparent manner. This is a tall requirement in Indian context .However if not addressed before launch, the bad bank may remain bad causing irreparable distress in future.

Dr. Ashok Haldia, Fmr MD & CEO, PFS


The blog has been authored by Dr. Ashok Haldia, Former MD & CEO, PFS.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETBFSI.com does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETBFSI.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank loans: Forbearance emergency medicine, not staple diet, says Economic Survey

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The current regulatory forbearance on bank loans has been necessitated by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Keeping in mind the negative consequences of prolonged regulatory forbearance following the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC), policymakers should lay out thresholds of economic recovery for withdrawal of the current regulatory forbearance on bank loans, economists in the finance ministry said.

“Remember that forbearance represents emergency medicine that should be discontinued at the first opportunity when the economy exhibits recovery, not a staple diet that gets continued for years,” the economists said in the Economic Survey 2020-21. An Asset Quality Review (AQR) exercise must be conducted immediately after the forbearance is withdrawn and the legal infrastructure for the recovery of loans needs to be strengthened de facto, they added.

The current regulatory forbearance on bank loans has been necessitated by the Covid-19 pandemic. Regulatory forbearance for banks involved relaxing the norms for restructuring assets, where restructured assets were no longer required to be classified as non-performing assets (NPAs) and therefore did not require the levels of provisioning that NPAs attract.

During the GFC, forbearance helped borrowers tide over temporary hardship caused due to the crisis and helped prevent a large contagion. However, the forbearance continued for seven years, though it should have been discontinued in 2011, when GDP, exports, IIP and credit growth had all recovered significantly. Given relaxed provisioning requirements, banks exploited the forbearance window to restructure loans even for unviable entities, thereby window dressing their books. The inflated profits were then used by banks to pay increased dividends to shareholders. As a result, banks became severely under-capitalised.

Concerned that the actual situation may be worse than reflected on the banks’ books, RBI initiated an AQR to clean up bank balance sheets.

While gross NPAs increased from 4.3% in 2014-15 to 7.5% in 2015-16 and peaked at 11.2% in 2017-18, the AQR could not bring out all the hidden bad assets in the bank books. This led to a second round of lending distortions, thereby exacerbating an already grave situation.

The prolonged forbearance policies following the GFC thus engendered the recent banking crisis that brought down investment rates and thereby economic growth in the country, the Survey noted.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Despite worsening asset quality, Manappuram Fin Q3 net up 16.6%

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Aggregate gold loan disbursement was at Rs 57,445.14 crore while the number of live gold loan customers stood at 26.2 lakh (as of December 31, 2020).

NBFC Manappuram Finance on Friday reported a 16.64 % year-on-year increase in its consolidated net profit for the third quarter of the current financial year to Rs 483.19 crore.

The Kerala-based lender, which also operates a home loan, microfinance and commercial vehicle-leasing subsidiary, has reported a standalone net profit of Rs 465.29 crore for its gold loan business, an increase of 39.28% from Rs 334 crore reported in the year-ago quarter.

Total consolidated operating income during the quarter stood at Rs 1,643.81 crore —14.46% growth over Rs 1436.19 crore reported in Q3 of the previous fiscal year. Consolidated assets under management (AUM) grew 14.70% to Rs 27,642.48 crore, from Rs24,099.95 crore a year ago.

Sharing the results with the media, MD & CEO VP Nandakumar said, “Once again, our results have been in line with our guidance. During this quarter, while gold loans did well, the turnaround in our microfinance subsidiary is particularly noteworthy. We are now confident that the pandemic related woes are behind us, and look forward to good growth in all our businesses in the coming days.”

The company’s gold loan AUM increased 24.43% to Rs20,211.58 crore from Rs16,242.95 crore in the year-ago quarter. Aggregate gold loan disbursement was at Rs 57,445.14 crore while the number of live gold loan customers stood at 26.2 lakh (as of December 31, 2020).

For the standalone entity, the average borrowing cost during the quarter decreased 18 bps to 8.95 %. The capital adequacy ratio stood at 25.85% while the gross NPA was at 1.26 % and net NPA at 0.84 % for the standalone entity.

The board of directors approved payment of an interim dividend of Rs 0.65 per share of the face value of Rs 2.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Union Bank net dives 37% due to threefold jump in provisions

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Though its operating profit declined 9% YoY, it grew 12% QoQ to Rs 5,311 crore. Net interest income (NII) increased 5% YoY and QoQ to Rs 6,590 crore.

Union Bank of India’s net profit declined 37% year on year (YoY) during the December quarter (Q3FY21) as provisions jumped three-fold. Provisions increased 189% YoY and 25% quarter on quarter (QoQ) to Rs 5, 256 crore. Despite this, the bank reported a 40% rise in net profit sequentially. Though its operating profit declined 9% YoY, it grew 12% QoQ to Rs 5,311 crore. Net interest income (NII) increased 5% YoY and QoQ to Rs 6,590 crore.

The bank’s provision coverage ratio (PCR) improved 300 basis points (bps) sequentially to 86%. The net interest margin (NIM) increased 43 bps on a sequential basis to 2.94%, but came down 21 bps on a y-o-y basis.

Union Bank of India MD and CEO Rajkiran Rai G said the lender was expecting growth in both retail and corporate segments. “We are expecting more sanctions in the March quarter,” he added. The state-owned bank also specified that the net profit during Q3FY21 was subdued because in the comparable quarter last year the combined entity got a boost from Essar Steel recovery. Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank were amalgamated into Union Bank of India on April 1, 2020.

The lender’s asset quality also showed an improvement during the December quarter. Gross non-performing assets (NPAs) ratio improved 122 bps to 13.49%, compared to 14.71% in the previous quarter. Similarly, net NPAs ratio came down 86 bps to 3.27% from 4.13% in the September quarter. The lender has not classified any NPAs since August 31, 2020, due to the interim order of the Supreme Court. “The pro forma gross NPAs stood at 15.28% and net NPAs at 5.02%,” Rai said. The lender was expecting net NPAs between 4 and 5% in the next quarter (Q4FY21), he added.

Advances remained flat on a y-o-y as well as sequential basis at Rs 6.51 lakh crore. The lender is, however, expecting substantial credit growth in the next quarter. “We are expecting credit growth of 4-6% in the next quarter (Q4FY21),” Rai said.

Deposits grew 3% YoY to Rs 8.82 lakh crore, but remained flat sequentially. Current account savings account (CASA) ratio remained at 32.67%, compared to 34.67% in the September quarter. The capital adequacy ratio stood at 12.98% at the end of the December quarter, compared to minimum regulatory requirement of 10.875%.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IndusInd Bank net falls 34% YoY on higher provisions

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The bank’s pro forma non-performing assets (NPAs) stood at Rs 6,159 crore and it made provisions to the extent of Rs 4,722 crore, or 77%.

IndusInd Bank’s net profit fell 34.4% year on year (YoY) to Rs 853 crore in the December quarter as a result of a 78% jump in provisions to Rs 1,854 crore. The bank also registered interest reversal in some accounts. Its net interest income (NII) increased 11% YoY to Rs 3,406 crore and net interest margin (NIM) fell four basis points (bps) sequentially to 4.12%.

Sumant Kathpalia, MD and CEO, IndusInd Bank, said the lender reversed interest income on bad assets, which remained unrecognised as a result of a September 3, 2020, judicial stay and these reversals were to the tune of Rs 185 crore. “Adjusted for this, NII and PPoP (pre-provision operating profit) growth would have been 17% and 14% YoY, respectively,” he said.

The bank’s pro forma non-performing assets (NPAs) stood at Rs 6,159 crore and it made provisions to the extent of Rs 4,722 crore, or 77%. “We have provided completely for the unsecured business, or the microfinance business, where we think the losses may be a little elevated. Having said that, in the corporate side of the book and the retail side, we do not expect losses,” Kathpalia said.

The bank has approved restructuring for 0.6% of its loan book and the process has been invoked for another 1.2% of its book, consisting largely of corporate loans. It expects another 0.3-0.4% of the book to undergo one-time recast as the window for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) remains open till March 31, 2021. “Our guidance to the market has always been 2.5-3%. We’ll come much below that target,” Kathpalia said.

Gross NPAs stood at 1.74% of advances as on December 31, 2020, down from 2.21% as on September 30, 2020. The net NPA ratio stood at 0.22% of net advances as on December 31 down from 0.52% on September 30. If the bank had recognised NPAs following income recognition and asset classification (IRAC) norms after August 31, 2020, the pro forma gross NPA ratio would have been 2.93% and the pro forma net NPA ratio would have been 0.7%.

The advances book shrank marginally on a y-o-y basis to Rs 2.07 lakh crore as on December 31, 2020, and total deposits rose 10% YoY to Rs 2.39 lakh crore. Current account savings account (CASA) deposits comprised 40.4% of total deposits as on December 31, 2020, down from 42.4% a year ago.

IndusInd Bank’s shares closed at Rs 846.25 on Friday on the BSE, up 5.44% from their previous close. The results were declared after the close of trade.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India invites applications from Service Providers for Media Monitoring and Analysis. Desirous Service Providers having minimum net worth of Rupees twenty five lakh and five years of experience in providing such services may send their application in prescribed format. Application form is available in the ‘Tenders’ section of the RBI website (www.rbi.org.in). Application addressed to Chief General Manager, Department of Communication, Reserve Bank of India, 9th Floor, Central Office Building, Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg, Mumbai – 400 001, should be duly sealed and submitted online on MSTC portal (www.mstcecommerce.com) by 5.00 pm on February 22, 2021, which will be opened at 3.00 PM on February 23, 2021. Pre-bid meeting for prospective bidders would be held on February 05, 2021. Queries, if any, can be addressed to newssummary@rbi.org.in. Corrigendum, if any, will be posted on RBI website only.

Chief General Manager
Department of Communication
Reserve Bank of India

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India, Bengaluru Regional Office invites E-tenders under Two – Bid system [Part-I (Technical Bid) & Part-II (Financial Bid)] for deployment of 03 Fire Supervisor and 06 Fire men at Bank’s Main office premises.

2. Last date for submission of e-tender on MSTC (https://www.mstcecommerce.com) is February 23, 2021 before 1000 hours. Tender will be opened electronically by the Tender Committee in the presence of tenderers or their authorized representatives (who wish to be present on the same day at 1500 hrs at HRMD, RBI, 10/3/8, Nrupathunga Road, Bengaluru 560001). In case of any holiday on the day of opening, the tenders will be opened on the next working day at the same time but the tender shall be closed for bidding on February 23, 2021 at 1000 hrs, as scheduled above. No tender by FAX/E-Mail/Telephone will be entertained. The Bank reserves the right to reject any or all the tenders without assigning any reason thereof.

Regional Director

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4 5 6 87