Stove Kraft Open Its IPO Today: Should You Subscribe?

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Investment

oi-Roshni Agarwal

|

Now this kitchen solution company Stove Kraft will be the fourth IPO of the month and year. Here are the details on the issue and which investors can bet on the issue and for how long?

Stove Kraft Open Its IPO Today: Should You Subscribe?

Stove Kraft Open Its IPO Today: Should You Subscribe?

Issue details: The public issue of Stove Kraft comprises fresh issue of Rs. 95 crore together with OFS of 82.50 lakh equity shares by promoters and investors. Price band has been decided at Rs 384-385 per share. And the issue will close for subscription on January 28. Already, the company has raked Rs. 185 crore through anchor book.

About Stove Kraft: The company manufactures kitchen appliance under the brand Gilma and Pigeon and also proposes to begin manufacturing of kitchen solutions under the BLACK + DECKER brand.

Issue objectives: The proceeds from the issue will be put towards repayment of debt.

Financials: The company logged revenue CAGR of 13 percent over FY 18-20. Over the period from FY18-20, there had been low operating margin with EBITDA ranging between 2-5 percent. In the financial year 2019-20, Stove Kraft’s profit rose to Rs 3.2 crore from Rs 0.7 crore in FY19 and loss of Rs 12 crore in FY18. The operating revenues in FY20 rose to Rs 669.9 crore from Rs 640.9 crore in FY19 and Rs 529 crore in FY19.

Valuation: “The company has priced its issue at 34.5x PE on a trailing basis, its peers TTK Prestige and Hawkins Cookers are currently trading at 61.0x and 47.5x respectively. On FY20 basis, the company priced its issue at 301.5x PE. Due to cost cutting measures, company margins improved in the first half of FY21 which is not sustainable. Cost such as travelling, advertisement reduced in H1FY21 due to COVID-19 are going to come back once business comes back to normalcy,” said Angel Broking.

So, as the valuations for the issue are deemed high in comparison to listed peers on FY20 earnings, lower brand value and likely unsustainability in the profitability logged in the H1FY21, brokerages are neutral are on the issue. Sustainability of improved profitability performance remains a critical factor, said ICICI Direct.

Should you subscribe to Stove Kraft IPO?

For small listing gains, investors can subscribe to the issue to only exit after listing as the issue does not seems attractive and this too can be betted on by investors who have a high risk profile. While, moderate to risk-averse investors can avoid the issue for now unless there is no clarification on the various issues raised around the public issue.

GoodReturns.in



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Yes Bank won’t dilute equity soon, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Yes Bank will not be raising capital via equity soon and the recent board approval is only part of an enabling provision to reduce its time-to-market in future, the bank’s MD & CEO Prashant Kumar, said. He added that the bank’s deposits will cover its loan book by end-March despite growth in advances.

“We expect the credit-deposit ratio to be 100% by the end of March from 116% at the end of December,” Kumar said. He said that the bank’s strategy is to use its digital capability to grow retail deposits and loans. According to its December quarter results, the bank’s capital adequacy ratio is 19.6%, while common equity tier I capital is 13.1%, “We are well-capitalised but we decided to go through the process, which will also require a shareholder approval, so that we are in readiness,” said Kumar.

The private bank, which was revived by an RBI-initiated resolution process, had seen a third of its deposits being withdrawn by wary customers before the central bank placed a moratorium on withdrawals. Since then, deposits have bounced back growing 36% in the first nine months of the fiscal. The bank on Friday reported a profit of Rs 151 crore in the third quarter as against a loss of Rs 18,560 crore in the year-ago period.

The bank also said that it has received more information on accounts linked to whistleblower allegations. “All the loans are fully provided for and there will not be any financial implication even if any more loans are declared as fraud,” said Kumar. He said that Cox & Kings, which has been in the news for action by authorities, has already been declared a fraud.

The bank had earlier sought approval from the RBI for a ‘bad bank’ that will take over troubled loans and is awaiting a response from the regulator. While the bank has a Rs 1,000-crore exposure to DHFL, it does not expect any major recovery this year. “I do not expect the resolution will be implemented before March 31. Besides, we are unsecured lenders and don’t know how much we will get,” he said.

“Our focus is on retail and MSME. We have disbursed almost Rs 12,000 crore in the third quarter and this path would continue,” said Kumar. He said the bank was rationalising expenditure with operating expenses reduced by 13% and more branch mergers in the offing. The bank has already converted some of its rural branches into business correspondent centres. To augment fee-income, the bank has tied up with HDFC Life and SBI Life for distribution on the life insurance side and ICICI Lombard and SBI General on the non-life insurance side.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Depositors seek end to ATM ‘decline fee’, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The All India Bank Depositors’ Association of India in their pre-policy meeting with RBI governor Shaktikanta Das have asked for the withdrawal of an “unjust” ‘transaction decline charge’ on debit cards.

Each time a person without adequate balance in his/her account tries to withdraw cash from an ATM or uses debit cards to make a payment, the bank penalises him/her Rs 25 plus GST as ‘transaction decline’ charge. This can be termed as the digital version of a charge for bouncing a cheque.

“Such exorbitant penalty for digitally paying consumers ‘disincentivises’ them, thereby many are moving away from digital payments. This applies more to the marginalised class of depositors who may not always have adequate funds in their accounts,” the association said in its written representation.

The body said that these charges are not only unjust but also against the principle of ‘transaction decline’ as this is not like issuing a cheque to a third-party but like a depositor walking into a branch and trying to draw cash. Also, there is no cost to the card-issuing bank in such transactions.

“The NPCI does not consider it as a transaction and hence no interchange is paid by the card-issuing bank,” the letter said. “Though, we can still understand that as a deterrent, banks charge for cheque bounce, where cheque/ECS returns involve third parties and create distrust in the payment mode. However, declined POS/ATM transactions due to insufficient balances is nowhere on a par with cheque/ECS returns. It does not involve any intent of systemic inconvenience or distrust to a third party,” the bank said.

In its representation to the RBI, the association said that prior to January 2020, SBI was charging Rs 17.7 per non-cash digital transaction for over 12 crore basic savings bank deposit accounts. “SBI has agreed to refund the exorbitant charges only for the period starting January 2020, but not prior to that. As disclosed by SBI, during FY20, SBI collected over Rs 150 crore towards service charges from such accounts,” the association said.

Another wrongful charge highlighted by the association was the one imposed by payment aggregators on consumers for making digital payments on e-commerce websites. While the merchants and the banks claimed that they were not the ones pocketing the charge, they did facilitate these charges. which were against the government mandate.

The association also urged the RBI governor not to cut interest rates as inflation has been high and oil prices were firming up.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

After banks, regulators to appeal against NCLT order, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


After banks, regulators, including the RBI, are set to appeal against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal’s (NCLT’s) Kolkata bench, which had allowed a moratorium on debt repayment by Srei Equipment Finance (SEFL). Some lenders have already moved the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to stay the order and appeal against it.

Banking sources told TOI that the RBI too will file a petition in the coming days as the NCLT had stopped all government or regulatory authorities from taking any coercive steps against the non-bank finance company, “including reporting in any form and/or changing the account status of the company from being a standard asset”.

“Credit rating agencies shall not consider any nonpayment to be a default and shall maintain the rating of SEFL at least that of investment grade,” an order issued late last month said.

The NCLT has asked the company to convene meetings of debenture holders, ECB lenders and perpetual debt instrument holders between May and July to work out a new scheme of arrangement. Earlier this month, CARE Ratings said it would continue to closely monitor the developments and is also seeking legal assistance.

SEFL had argued that the RBI allowed moratorium and loan restructuring for NBFC borrowers but finance companies were not given a moratorium. This along with the economic downturn in the wake of Covid-19, has led to an asset-liability mismatch, it argued.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India, Bhubaneswar invites sealed tenders/applications from established and reputed catering agencies (with sufficient experience of running canteens) to run the Staff Canteen at its building located at Bhubaneswar. Interested companies / firms having good reputation may collect the Tender Form /Application in two parts (Technical bid and Financial bid), having all the detailed terms and conditions from “Reserve Bank of India, Human Resource Management Department (2nd Floor), Bhubaneswar Office “on any working day between 11.00 AM and 4.00 PM from January 25, 2021 to February 17, 2021. Tender forms can be downloaded from our website http://www.rbi.org.in under “Tenders” section.

The tender shall be submitted in two parts in two separate sealed envelope viz, Part I (Technical Bid) and Part II (Financial Bid) and those should be kept in a bigger sealed envelope. Duly completed tender in sealed covers superscribed “TENDER FOR CATERING SERVICES AT STAFF CANTEEN AT RBI BHUBANESWAR” should be submitted to The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, Human Resource Management Department, Bhubaneswar Regional Office, on or before 2 PM on February 18, 2021 (Thursday). A box has been kept at the 2nd floor for this purpose. Tenders received after the said date and time will not be accepted. The Bank reserves its right to accept or reject any or all of the offers without assigning any reason there for.

Regional Director
Reserve Bank of India
Bhubaneswar

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less




April 14, 2015





Dear All




Welcome to the refurbished site of the Reserve Bank of India.





The two most important features of the site are: One, in addition to the default site, the refurbished site also has all the information bifurcated functionwise; two, a much improved search – well, at least we think so but you be the judge.





With this makeover, we also take a small step into social media. We will now use Twitter (albeit one way) to send out alerts on the announcements we make and YouTube to place in public domain our press conferences, interviews of our top management, events, such as, town halls and of course, some films aimed at consumer literacy.




The site can be accessed through most browsers and devices; it also meets accessibility standards.



Please save the url of the refurbished site in your favourites as we will give up the existing site shortly and register or re-register yourselves for receiving RSS feeds for uninterrupted alerts from the Reserve Bank.



Do feel free to give us your feedback by clicking on the feedback button on the right hand corner of the refurbished site.



Thank you for your continued support.




Department of Communication

Reserve Bank of India


Next

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘Depositors reeling under the impact of interest rate cuts’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The All India Bank Depositors’ Association (AIBDA) has told the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) that depositors are reeling under the impact of interest rate cuts and that there are no compelling reasons for it to reduce the repo rate.

In its pre-monetary policy representation to the RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das, AIBDA also underscored the charges imposed for debit card use when transactions are declined at ATM or POS due to insufficient funds in the account should be rationalised.

Further, the association requested the RBI to review its extant instructions to Payment Aggregators (PAs) and Payment Gateways (PGs) to ensure that these are not exploited by these entities to engage in profiteering.

The association observed that the sharp reduction in term-deposit rates, in the wake of the cumulative 250 basis points repo rate cut between August 2018 and May 2020, has adversely affected both the nominal and real interest incomes of depositors in general, and the small income earners and senior citizens more severely.

For example, a fresh deposit of one-year to less than two years’ tenor parked with the State Bank of India is now earning a saver 5 per cent interest against 6.70 per cent in August 2018.

After the last repo rate cut from 4.40 per cent to 4 per cent on May 22, 2020, this rate has remained unchanged for the last eight months.

AIBDA asserted that there are virtually no compelling grounds for the Monetary Poilcy Committee and the RBI to consider withdrawal of the “strategic pause” of the last about eight months with respect to the key policy rates as the recent fall in the retail inflation rate is tentative and fragile.

Exorbitant charges

The association said over the years banks have been imposing exorbitant charges on use of debit card whenever there is a transaction decline at ATM or point of sale (POS) due to insufficient balance in the account.

These charges are predominantly of the order of ₹25 plus Goods and Service Tax.

“Such exorbitant penalty for digitally paying consumers disincentivises them, thereby moving many away from digital payments.

“This applies more to the marginalised class of depositors who may not always have adequate funds in their accounts.” said Sunil S Bhandare, President, and Amitha Sehgal, Honorary Secretary, AIBDA.

They emphasised that such bank charges do not make sense since the rationale behind it is flawed.

“We can still understand that as a deterrent, banks charge for cheque bounce, where Cheque/Electronic Clearing Service returns involve third parties and create distrust in the payment mode.

“However, declined POS/ATM transactions due to insufficient balances is nowhere at par with cheque/ECS returns. It does not involve any intent of systemic inconvenience or distrust to a third party,” reasoned the AIBDA office-bearers.

AIBDA mentioned that there is no cost imposed by the National Payments Corporation of India/acquirer bank onto the card-issuing bank for debit card use when transactions are declined at ATM or POS due to insufficient funds in the account.

MDR

AIBDA flagged the current market practice of airline industry and even a few hospitals and other service institutions charging disproportionately high surcharges/ convenience fees, putting consumers at a disadvantage.

“It was expected that the RBI would bring forth regulation to ensure that such charges are reasonable and fair to consumers.

“But with the…instruction (Guidelines on Regulation of PAs and PGs), the RBI appears to have legitimised such charges. Moreover, there seems to be a back door entry to MDR (merchant discount rate) as PAs would typically enter into a revenue sharing arrangement with the acquirer banks,” the Association said.

All these charges, unfairly, are ultimately thrust onto consumers who use the digital platforms, it added.

MDR is the fee charged by the acquirer bank (that provides necessary infrastructure to the merchant to accept payments) to the merchant.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IRDAI panel for separate payments of vehicle, insurance premium

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Buyer of a new vehicle may have to pay cost of vehicle and insurance premium through separate cheques, if the recommendations of a committee to review MISP guidelines are accepted by the insurance regulator Irdai.

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai) had issued MISP guidelines in 2017 with the intention of streamlining the process and bringing the practices of vehicle insurance, being sold by automotive dealers under the provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938.

 

Motor Insurance Service Provider (MISP)

Motor Insurance Service Provider (MISP) refers to an automobile dealer appointed by the insurer or the insurance intermediary to distribute and/ or service motor insurance policies of automotive vehicles sold through it.

In June 2019, the regulator had set up a committee to review the MISP guidelines. The panel has submitted report in which it has made various recommendations for orderly conduct of motor insurance business through MISP channel.

Among other issues, the panel examined the current practice of collecting the premium payment from the customer while soliciting the motor insurance policy.

Current process

Under the present system, it said there is a lack of transparency in the cost of insurance premium when the customer buys the vehicle for the first time through the automotive dealer and makes the payment through one single cheque.

As the MISP makes payment to the insurance company from his own account, “the customer does not know the insurance premium being paid as it is subsumed in the cost of the vehicle”, the committee said.

It suggested that this lack of transparency is not in the interest of the policyholders’ nterest as the true cost of insurance is not known to the customer. “The customer may not be aware of the coverage options and discounts available in the process. The customer also cannot negotiate with the MISP to get the best coverage at the optimal price.” The committee recommended that the customer should make payment to the insurance company directly which is facilitated by the MISP.

“MISP shall not collect the insurance premium amount in its own account and then transfer the same to the insurance company,” it added.

According to the report, the motor insurance business sourced by MISPs through brokers and insurers put together constitutes around 25 per cent of the total motor insurance business or around 11.25 per cent of the overall general insurance business.

In its report, the committee said that given the potential opportunity for motor insurance business through the MISPs, there is a need to develop and strengthen regulatory framework and supervision activities for this distribution channel.

The panel has also made recommendations on the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).

It noted that OEMs wield tremendous influence over the automotive dealers.

“The OEMs should be brought into the regulatory ambit. Therefore, the definition of MISP should also include OEM,” the panel said.

The panel also suggested that an MISP should mandatorily disclose to the customer the remuneration and reward that it gets from the insurance company or the insurance intermediary.

In case of cashless settlement, it said the MISP should necessarily segregate the two functions of sales and servicing of motor insurance policies and ensure that there is complete arms-length relationship between the two. PTI

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Valuations out of comfort zone: What you should do now

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A famous law in economics — Stein’s Law– states, “If something cannot go on for ever, it will stop”.

With the Sensex touching the 50,000 mark last week, one thing on every one’s mind is this – will the exuberance continue or will the markets succumb to Stein’s law? In this column we analyse two metrics that investors can keep track of to judge the market situation.

Buffet Indicator

In an interview in 2001, legendary investor Warren Buffet noted that the single best measure of where valuations stand at any moment was the ratio of market capitalisation of all listed securities as a percentage of GNP. This has subsequently become famous as the Buffet Indicator. Since in many cases there is no significant difference between GNP and GDP, the market capitalisation by GDP is more commonly used.

According to Buffet, in the context of US economy, if the percentage relationship falls to the 70-80 per cent levels it’s good time to buy. If the ratio approaches 200 per cent as it did in 1999-2000 during the dotcom bubble, investors were ‘playing with fire’.

Of course, it was playing with fire as those who remained invested in the benchmark Nasdaq index at those levels of market cap-to-GDP, saw 77 per cent of their investment value burnt from the peak of the bubble in March 2000 to its bottom in October 2002.

Right now the market capitalisation-to-GDP in the US is around 190 per cent — right in the ‘playing with fire’ zone. Given that financial events in the US always impact the rest of the world, this poses risk for stock markets across the world. .

Where does India fare in this metric? India’s current market cap-to-GDP is around 100 per cent now. While this might appear lower than the ratio in US, we need to see this in the context of our economy and history.

Our market cap-to-GDP peaked at around 149 per cent in December 2007, and the Nifty 50 index fell 60 per cent from those levels by March 2009, falling back to a ratio of a little above 60 per cent of the annual GDP at that time. Since then, the highest we have reached is 105 times in 2017 Given our history, the Buffet Indicator for India is signalling over valuation. Every time it has crossed the 80 to 90 per cent levels, markets have either crashed or atleast underperfomed risk free options. While it might be lower than the ratio in the US, one needs to factor in that we have an unorganised sector that makes up 50 per cent of the GDP and our corporate profits to GDP ratio is about half the levels prevailing in the US.

Trailing PE ratio

Historically, Indian markets have always cracked or underperfomed sooner or later after benchmark Nifty50 index nears/crosses trailing PE of around 24 times. In the peak of the Y2K/dotcom bubble, it traded up to a PE of 29 times in February 2000. From the peak level of 1,756 then, the Nifty 50 corrected by around 50 per cent as the bubble burst and unwound.

In the housing bubble driven bull market of 2007-08, it traded up to a PE of 24 times in January 2008 and subsequently the index witnessed wealth destruction of around 60 per cent as the entire world faced consequences of the sub-prime crisis created by the housing bubble. Currently, the trailing PE of Nifty 50 is at a historical high and mind boggling 36 times. Even if one were to be very generous and take an EPS 20 per cent higher (closer to FY20 consensus EPS estimates prior to covid-disruption) to adjust for Covid impact on earnings, it trades at around 29 times – levels from which it crashed in 2000.

While in general the logic is that markets look to the future and one should look at forward PE, trailing PE has been historically a good indicator from an index level. The reasons being forward earnings is built more on expectations which may or may not pan out, and the other reason being forward earnings cannot be disconnected from trailing earnings. While there might be individual cases of earnings differing vastly from trailing levels, at an aggregate or index level it is usually not the case.

Historically, trading at over stretched PE ratios has had severe consequences. For example, the main index in China SSE Composite traded up to a PE of over 40 times in 2007 as equity mania rose to historic proportions there. This culminated in a correction of more than 70 per cent. Despite robust economic growth since then, the index is still 40 per cent below its peak of 2007, nearly 14 years later. It trades at humbling PE of around 18 times today.

What this means to you

While market pundits and fund managers you watch on TV might justify these valuations by pointing to record low interest rates, they are sharing only half the truth.

The other part which is not explicitly explained is that interest rates are low because economic growth is low. Low growth will result in low earnings growth. In the long term stock markets have always been a function of earnings growth and interest rates. They are likely to perform worst when interest rates are high and earnings growth is low. They perform best when interest rates are low and earnings growth is high. Hence the current scenario where interest rates and earnings growth are low is not a case for all time high valuations.

Whether it is the Buffet Indicator or the PE ratio, the indications clearly are that Indian markets are in over-heated territory. That means it is time for you to be prudent in your equity allocation, plan for the long-term and not follow the herd for quick profits. As the famous quote from ‘The Dark Knight’ goes – ‘You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain’. Bull markets usually choose the latter. One must invest wisely to not get trapped by the villain.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

What if banks goof up on TDS on fixed deposits

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


I had taken a senior citizen savings scheme for ₹15 lakh with a PSU bank in 2018-19. Due to a clerical error, the PAN was not entered in their system. Accordingly they deducted TDS at 20 per cent on interest and as my PAN was not mentioned, the deduction does not reflect in Form 26 AS. Now, I cannot claim credit for the TDS. What is the solution to this problem?

Murli Krishnamurthy

Since the amount of tax deducted at source (TDS) is not reflecting in your Form 26AS, you may request your banker to file or revise their withholding tax return for the relevant quarter to which the transaction pertains. Once the details of the correct PAN are provided in the revised TDS return by the banker, the amount of TDS deducted will reflect appropriately in your Form 26AS.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes vide its memoranda issued on June 1, 2015, and March 11, 2016, had advised tax officers not to recover the amount of taxes deducted at source from taxpayers if the deductor has already withheld the taxes and failed to deposit the same to the government. The Bombay High Court in the case of Yashpal Sahni ([2007] 165 Taxman 144 (BOM)) held that the tax authorities cannot recover taxes once again from a taxpayer who has suffered deduction and the deductor has failed to deposit such taxes to the treasury.

In view of the said notification and judicial precedents, where your banker is unable to resolve your query immediately (before the due date of filing the tax return) you may claim TDS credit in your tax return.

However, due to mismatch in the credit claimed in the tax return vis-à-vis Form 26AS, your tax return might be processed with an error in claiming the TDS, and demand could be raised to that effect. A grievance petition before the ‘Centralised Processing Centre for TDS return via the e-filing portal could be filed, with supporting documents such as bank statement, statement of TDS (Form 16 A), etc.

The writer is Partner, Deloitte India.

Send your queries to taxtalk@thehindu.co.in

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 19 20 21 22 23 87